Volume 13 Issue 6
Feb.  2023
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Daniela P. González. Disaster Risk Governance as Assemblage: The Chilean Framework of the 1985 San Antonio Earthquake[J]. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2022, 13(6): 878-889. doi: 10.1007/s13753-022-00453-y
Citation: Daniela P. González. Disaster Risk Governance as Assemblage: The Chilean Framework of the 1985 San Antonio Earthquake[J]. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2022, 13(6): 878-889. doi: 10.1007/s13753-022-00453-y

Disaster Risk Governance as Assemblage: The Chilean Framework of the 1985 San Antonio Earthquake

doi: 10.1007/s13753-022-00453-y
  • Received Date: 2022-10-23
  • Accepted Date: 2022-10-23
  • Available Online: 2023-02-09
  • Publish Date: 2022-11-16
  • The purpose of this article is to analyze disaster risk governance through assemblage theory, identifying how-during the altered political context of a military regime with a centralized disaster risk management as in the case of Chile in 1985-new actors emerge during the disaster response phase as a de/reterritorialization effect that is influenced by their agencies and relationships, disfiguring the edges of the assemblage. Based on this conceptualization, it is possible to investigate the interactions between the different actors, their power relations, and their reconfigurations in the governance exercise. For this purpose, we reviewed the response phase of the 1985 San Antonio earthquake that affected the central zone of Chile, where strategic functions, institutions, and forms of power are concentrated. To describe and visualize the actors during the response phase in the disaster risk governance framework, a map of actors was developed that identifies the existing relationships and their different weights. The central scale proved to be dominant and occupied a political space that was transfigured by its overrepresentation-enforced by allies such as the banking system and business associations-enhancing a neoliberal agenda. The leaps in scale from the central scale to the local scale cancel agency of the last, destabilizing its capacity to deal with the effects of the earthquake and isolating it from the decision-making processes. Consequently, delays in providing aid demonstrate that authoritarian governments do not provide better management in the disaster response phase.
  • loading
  • Adey, P., B. Anderson, and S. Graham. 2015. Introduction:Governing emergencies:Beyond exceptionality. Theory, Culture & Society 32(2):3-17.
    Adger, W.N. 2006. Vulnerability. Global Environmental Change 16(3):268-281.
    Agamben, G. 2005. State of exception (Estado de Excepción). Buenos Aires:AdrianaHidalgoeditora (in Spanish).
    Albris, K., K.C. Lauta, and E. Raju. 2020. Disaster knowledge gaps:Exploring the interface between science and policy for disaster risk reduction in Europe. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science 11(1):1-12.
    Aldrich, D.P. 2019. Challenges to coordination:Understanding intergovernmental friction during disasters. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science 10(3):306-316.
    Allen, J. 2004. The whereabouts of power:Politics, government and space. Geografiska Annaler:Series B, Human Geography 86(1):19-32.
    Allen, J., and A. Cochrane. 2010. Assemblages of state power:Topological shifts in the organization of government and politics. Antípode 42(5):1071-1089.
    Anderson, B., and C. McFarlane. 2011. Assemblage and geography. Area 43(2):124-127.
    Angell, E. 2014. Assembling disaster:Earthquakes and urban politics in Istanbul. City 18(6):667-678.
    Baker, T., and P. McGuirk. 2017. Assemblage thinking as methodology:Commitments and practices for critical policy research. Territory, Politics, Governance 5(4):425-442.
    Blackburn, S. 2014. The politics of scale and disaster risk governance:Barriers to decentralisation in Portland, Jamaica. Geoforum 52:101-112.
    Brenner, N. 1999. Globalisation as reterritorialisation:The re-scaling of urban governance in the European Union. Urban Studies 36(3):431-451.
    Briassoulis, H. 2017. Response assemblages and their socioecological fit:Conceptualizing human responses to environmental degradation. Dialogues in Human Geography 7(2):166-185.
    Cutter, S.L. 2012. Vulnerability to environmental hazards. In Hazards, vulnerability and environmental justice, ed. S. Cutter, 71-82. London:Routledge.
    DeLanda, M. 2006. A new philosophy of society:Assemblage theory and social complexity. London:Continuum.
    Deleuze, G., and F. Guattari. 1987. A thousand plateaus:Capitalism and schizophrenia (Mil Mesetas. Capitalismo y Ezquizofrenia). Valencia:Pre-textos (in Spanish).
    Donovan, A. 2017. Geopower:Reflections on the critical geography of disasters. Progress in Human Geography 41(1):44-67.
    Donovan, A. 2020. When the vertical becomes horizontal:Experiencing exploding mountains in borderlands. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 110(4):1040-1058.
    Drury, A.C., and R.S. Olson. 1998. Disasters and political unrest:An empirical investigation. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management 6(3):153-161.
    Duda, P.I., I. Kelman, and N. Glick. 2020. Informal disaster governance. Politics and Governance 8(4):375-385.
    Farías, I. 2011. The politics of urban assemblages. City 15(3-4):365-374.
    Farías, I. 2014. Misrecognizing tsunamis:Ontological politics and cosmopolitical challenges in early warning systems. The Sociological Review 62(S1):61-87.
    Farías, I., and P. Flores. 2017. A different state of exception:Governing urban reconstruction in post-27F Chile. Urban Studies 54(5):1108-1125.
    Feely, M. 2020. Assemblage analysis:An experimental new-materialist method for analysing narrative data. Qualitative Research 20(2):174-193.
    Forino, G., S. Bonati, and L.M. Calandra. 2018. Governing risks, hazards and disasters in theory and practice:An introduction and overview of the book. In Governance of risk, hazards and disasters:Trends in theory and practice, 1st edn, ed. G. Forino, S. Bonati, and L.M. Calandra, 1-7. London:Routledge.
    Fuentes, L., and A. Orellana. 2013. Metropolitan governance in Bogota and Santiago:Divergent institutionality, convergent outcomes (Gobernabilidad Metropolitana En Bogotá y Santiago:Institucionalidad Divergente, Resultados Convergentes). Ciudad y Territorio 50(175):113-128(in Spanish).
    Gaillard, J.C., and J. Mercer. 2013. From knowledge to action:Bridging gaps in disaster risk reduction. Progress in Human Geography 37(1):93-114.
    Greenhough, B. 2012. On the agencement of the academic geographer. Dialogues in Human Geography 2(2):202-206.
    Grove, K.J. 2013. From emergency management to managing emergence:A genealogy of disaster management in Jamaica. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 103(3):570-588.
    Grove, K. 2014. Agency, affect, and the immunological politics of disaster resilience. Environment and Planning D:Society and Space 32(2):240-256.
    Guggenheim, M. 2014. Introduction:Disasters as politics-Politics as disasters. Sociological Review 62(1_suppl):1-16.
    Hardt, M., and A. Negri. 2000. Empire. Cambridge:Harvard University Press.
    Harvey, D. 1989. From managerialism to entrepreneurialism:The transformation in urban governance in late capitalism and geography. Geografiska Annaler. Series B, Human Geography 71(1):3-17.
    Harvey, D. 2007. Spaces of capital. Towards a critical geography (Espacios Del Capital Hacia Una Geografía Crítica). Madrid:Ediciones Akal S.A. (in Spanish).
    Jasanoff, S. 2013. Epistemic subsidiarity-Coexistence, cosmopolitanism, constitutionalism. Transnational Risks and Multilevel Regulation 4(2):133-141.
    Jessop, B. 2000. The crisis of the national spatio-temporal fix and the tendential ecological dominance of globalizing capitalism. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 24(2):323-360.
    Jessop, B. 2002. Liberalism, neoliberalism, and urban governance:A state-theoretical perspective. Antípode 34(3):452-472.
    Jones, S., K. Oven, B. Manyena, and K. Aryal. 2014. Governance struggles and policy processes in disaster risk reduction:A case study from Nepal. Geoforum 57:78-90.
    Jovita, H.D., A. Nurmandi, D. Mutiarin, and E.P. Purnomo. 2018. Why does network governance fail in managing post-disaster conditions in the Philippines?. Jamba Journal of Disaster Risk Studies 10(1):1-11.
    Lawner, M. 2011. Architects, from one earthquake to the next (Los Arquitectos, de Terremoto En Terremoto). In Reconstruction(s) civil society (Reconstrucción(es) Sociedad Civil), ed. C. Cares, W.A. Imilan, and P. Vergara, 127-150. Punjab:INVI (in Spanish).
    Li, T.M. 2007. Practices of assemblage and community forest management. Economy and Society 36(2):263-293.
    McFarlane, C. 2012. Rethinking informality:Politics, crisis, and the city. Planning, Theory & Practice 13(1):89-108.
    McFarlane, C., and J. Silver. 2017. Navigating the city:Dialectics of everyday urbanism. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 42(3):458-471.
    McGowran, P., and A. Donovan. 2021. Assemblage theory and disaster risk management. Progress in Human Geography 45(6):1601-1624.
    Meriläinen, E. 2020. Urban disaster governance:Resilience and rights in the unequal city. Doctoral thesis, Hanken School of Economics. Helsinki.
    Meriläinen, E.S., M. Fougère, and W. Piotrowicz. 2020. Refocusing urban disaster governance on marginalised urban people through right to the city. Environmental Hazards 19(2):187-208.
    Nail, T. 2017. What is an assemblage?. Sub-Stance 46(1):21-37.
    Navarro, A. 1985. The Chilean press system under military rule (El Sistema de Prensa En Chile Bajo El Gobierno Militar (1973-1984)), 1st edn. Santiago:CENECA (in Spanish).
    Neisser, F.M. 2014. "Riskscapes" and risk management-Review and synthesis of an actor-network theory approach. Risk Management 16(2):88-120.
    Ong, A. 2006. Neoliberalism as exception:Mutations in citizenship and sovereignty. Durham:Duke University Press.
    Peck, J., N. Theodore, and N. Brenner. 2009. Neoliberal urbanism:Models, moments, mutations. SAIS Review of International Affairs 29(1):49-66.
    Pelling, M., and K. Dill. 2006. "Natural" disasters as catalysts of political action. ISP/NSC briefing paper 06/01. London:Chatham House.
    Pelling, M., and K. Dill. 2010. Disaster politics:Tipping points for change in the adaptation of sociopolitical regimes. Progress in Human Geography 34(1):21-37.
    Pierre, J. 1999. Models of urban governance:The institutional dimension of urban politics. Urban Affairs Review 34(3):17-20.
    Quezada, J., K. Bataille, and G. González. 2005. The effect of subduction earthquakes on the coastal configuration of northern Chile. Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on Andean Geodynamics (ISAG 2005), Barcelona, 578-581.
    Renn, O. 2008. Risk governance:Coping with uncertainty in a complex world. London:Earthscan.
    Rodríguez, J. 1993. Evolution of the population of Greater Santiago:Trends, perspectives and consequences (Evolución de La Población Del Gran Santiago:Tendencias, Perspectivas y Consecuencias). Notas de Población 58:95-184(in Spanish).
    Sandoval, V., and J.P. Sarmiento. 2020. A neglected issue:Informal settlements, urban development, and disaster risk reduction in Latin America and the Caribbean. Disaster Prevention and Management:An International Journal 29(5):731-745.
    Sandoval, V., and M. Voss. 2016. Disaster governance and vulnerability:The case of Chile. Politics and Governance 4(4):107-116.
    Sandoval, V., and M. Voss. 2018. Multi-scalar disaster governance and vulnerability in Chile. In Governance of risk, hazards and disasters, ed. G. Forino, S. Bonati, and L.M. Calandra, 27-42. London:Routledge.
    Sandoval, V., C. Gonzalez-Muzzio, C. Villalobos, J.P. Sarmiento, and G. Hoberman. 2020. Assessing disaster capitalism in post-disaster processes in Chile:Neoliberal reforms and the role of the corporate class. Disaster Prevention and Management:An International Journal 29(6):831-847.
    Sandoval, V., B. Wisner, and M. Voss. 2021. Natural hazards governance in Chile. In Oxford research encyclopedia of natural hazard science, ed. Q. Miao. Oxford:Oxford University Press.
    Siddiqi, A., and J.J.P. Canuday. 2018. Stories from the frontlines:Decolonising social contracts for disasters. Disasters 42(S2):S215-S238.
    Stoker, G. 1998. Governance as theory:Five propositions. International Social Science Journal 68(227-228):15-24.
    Swyngedouw, E., F. Moulaert, and A. Rodríguez. 2002. Neoliberal urbanization in Europe:Large-scale urban development projects and the new urban policy. Antipode 34(3):542-577.
    Tierney, K. 2012. Disaster governance:Social, political, and economic dimensions. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 37:341-363.
    Tironi, M. 2014. Atmospheres of indagation:Disasters and the politics of excessiveness. The Sociological Review 62(1):114-134.
    Van Wezemael, J. 2008. The contribution of assemblage theory and minor politics for democratic network governance. Planning Theory 7(2):165-185.
    Walker, J., and M. Cooper. 2011. Genealogies of resilience:From systems ecology to the political economy of crisis adaptation. Security Dialogue 42(2):143-160.
    Wanner, M.S.T. 2020. Drivers of change in national disaster governance under the Hyogo Framework for Action. Politics and Governance 8(4):256-269.
  • 加载中


    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (16) PDF downloads(0) Cited by()
    Proportional views


    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint