Outcontracting in Emergency Management: More Than a Business Conundrum

Yvonne Rademacher

doi:10.1007/s13753-011-0016-5

Article Contents

Article Navigation > International Journal of Disaster Risk Science > 2011 > 2(4): 15-21

Yvonne Rademacher. Outcontracting in Emergency Management: More Than a Business Conundrum[J]. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2011, 2(4): 15-21. doi: 10.1007/s13753-011-0016-5

Citation:

Yvonne Rademacher. Outcontracting in Emergency Management: More Than a Business Conundrum[J]. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2011, 2(4): 15-21. doi: 10.1007/s13753-011-0016-5

Yvonne Rademacher. Outcontracting in Emergency Management: More Than a Business Conundrum[J]. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2011, 2(4): 15-21. doi: 10.1007/s13753-011-0016-5

Citation:

Yvonne Rademacher. Outcontracting in Emergency Management: More Than a Business Conundrum[J]. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2011, 2(4): 15-21. doi: 10.1007/s13753-011-0016-5

PDF

Outcontracting in Emergency Management: More Than a Business Conundrum

doi: 10.1007/s13753-011-0016-5

Yvonne Rademacher^,

Disaster Research Center, University of Delaware, DE 19716, USA

Available Online: 2021-04-26

Abstract

Abstract

Outcontracting is a growing practice by governments as well as by nongovernmental organizations engaged in emergency management. Understanding the role of the private sector in providing equipment and services is critical in ensuring that emergency management is carried out as effectively and efficiently as possible in the best interest of the affected population. This inquiry looks at the types of services that the U.S. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) contracts out to both for-profit and not-for-profit organizations and examines the reviews that these services have received by government itself, interest groups, and disaster scientists. The article concludes with an overview of specific functional areas, where the services of either for-profits or not-for-profits are most appropriate in relation to their areas of expertise. The implication drawn from the analysis is that contractors' motivations and expertise need to be clearly understood when awarding government contracts in order to respond effectively to disaster needs and meet taxpayers' expectations.
- emergency management,
- FEMA,
- for-profit contractor,
- government outcontracting,
- not-for-profit contractor,
- United States

FullText(HTML)

References(19)

References

AFL-CIO (American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations). 2005. AFL-CIO President John J. Sweeney Statement on Executive Order Waiving Davis Bacon on Federally Funded Hurricane Reconstruction. Press Release, 8 September 2005. http://www.aflcio.org/mediacenter/prsptm/pr09082005.cfm.

ARC (American Red Cross). 2010. Red Cross to Share Mass Care Responsibility for U.S. Emergencies. News Release, 22 October 2010. http://www.redcross.org.

——. 2011a. Delivering Relief, Inspiring Hope-2010 Disaster Relief Program Review.http://www.redcross.org/www-files/Documents/pdf/domestic%20programs/DisasterReliefProgramReview.pdf.

——. 2011b. Request for Proposal. Feasibility Study on Multi-Purpose Community Disaster Centers in Haiti 2011. 16 March 2011. http://www.europeanevaluation.org/images/file/Jobs/2011-05-12_ARC_RFP-Feasibility_study_on_Community_DM_centers-Haiti.pdf.

DHS (Department of Homeland Security). Office of the Inspector General. 2009. Improvement Needed in Federal Emergency Management Agency Monitoring of Grantees. OIG-09-38. Washington, DC:Office of Inspector General, Department of Homeland Security.

FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency). 2005. FEMA Contracts to Provide Housing Relief for Displaced Hurricane Victims. Press Release Number HQ-05-228, 8 September 2005. http://www.fema.gov/news/newsrelease.fema?id=18708.

——. 2011a. Active Contracts as of April 7, 2011. http://www.fema.gov/pdf/business/activecontracts.pdf.

——. 2011b. Glossary. http://www.fema.gov/oer/reference/glossary.shtm.

Habitat for Humanity. 2012. Fact Sheet. http://www.habitat.org/how/factsheet.aspx.

Handmer, J. 2000. Are Emergency Services Becoming Private? The Australian Journal of Emergency Management 15(3):42-45.

Kirschenbaum, A. 2004. Chaos Organization and Disaster Management. Public Administration and Public Policy. No. 105. New York:CRC Press.

Roberts, P. S. 2010. Private Choices, Public Harms:The Evolution of National Disaster Organizations in the United States. In Disaster and the Politics of Intervention, edited by A. Lakoff, 41-69. New York:Columbia University Press.

The Shaw Group Inc. 2012. Executive Compensation and Governance Overview. http://www.shawgrp.com.

Sylves, R. T. 2008. Disaster Policy and Politics:Emergency Management and Homeland Security. Washington, DC:CQ Press.

Trichur, G. K. 2007. Spectacular Privatizations-Perceptions and Lessons from Privatization of Warfare and the Privatization of Disaster. In Racing the Storm-Racial Implications and Lessons Learned from Hurricane Katrina, edited by H. Potter, 225-246. Lanham, MD:Lexington Books.

UN (United Nations). 2011. Global Assessment Report on Disaster Risk Reduction. Geneva, Switzerland:United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction.

U.S. House of Representatives. Committee on Education and the Workforce. 2005. Representative Miller to Force House to Vote on President's Gulf Coast Wage Cut. Press Release, 20 October 2005. http://www.house.gov/apps/list/press/edlabor_dem/rel102005.html.

Weir, S. 2012. Sustainability:A Holistic Approach. The Forum. Habitat for Humanity. http://www.habitat.org/theforum/english/sustain/holistic_approach.aspx.

The White House. Office of the Press Secretary. 2005. Proclamation by the President:To Suspend Subchapter IV of Chapter 31 of Title 40, United States Code, within a Limited Geographic Area in Response to the National Emergency Caused by Hurricane Katrina. Press release, 8 September 2005. http://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2005/09/20050908-5.html.

Relative Articles

Supplements(0)

Cited By

Proportional views