Visually Modelling Collaborative Research into Innovative Community Disaster Resilience Practice, Strategy, and Governance

Thomas J. Huggins; Robin Peace; Stephen R. Hill; David M. Johnston; Alicia Cuevas Muñiz

doi:10.1007/s13753-015-0061-6

Article Contents

Article Navigation > International Journal of Disaster Risk Science > 2015 > 6(3): 282-294

Thomas J. Huggins, Robin Peace, Stephen R. Hill, David M. Johnston, Alicia Cuevas Muñiz. Visually Modelling Collaborative Research into Innovative Community Disaster Resilience Practice, Strategy, and Governance[J]. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2015, 6(3): 282-294. doi: 10.1007/s13753-015-0061-6

Citation:

Thomas J. Huggins, Robin Peace, Stephen R. Hill, David M. Johnston, Alicia Cuevas Muñiz. Visually Modelling Collaborative Research into Innovative Community Disaster Resilience Practice, Strategy, and Governance[J]. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2015, 6(3): 282-294. doi: 10.1007/s13753-015-0061-6

Citation:

Thomas J. Huggins, Robin Peace, Stephen R. Hill, David M. Johnston, Alicia Cuevas Muñiz. Visually Modelling Collaborative Research into Innovative Community Disaster Resilience Practice, Strategy, and Governance[J]. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2015, 6(3): 282-294. doi: 10.1007/s13753-015-0061-6

PDF

Visually Modelling Collaborative Research into Innovative Community Disaster Resilience Practice, Strategy, and Governance

doi: 10.1007/s13753-015-0061-6

1 Joint Centre for Disaster Research, School of Psychology, Massey University, Wellington 6011, New Zealand;
2 School of Psychology, Massey University, Palmerston North 4474, New Zealand;
3 School of Psychology, Massey University Joint Centre of Disaster Research, Massey University, Wellington 6140, New Zealand;
4 Faculty of Science, University of Colima, 28040 Colima, Mexico

Funds:

The current research was funded by the Earthquake Commission of New Zealand, The Institute of GNS Science and Massey University. Persons overseeing this funding did not play any role in the study design, collection, analysis, and interpretation of data, or in the writing and submission of this article. The research was conducted within the guidelines and procedures of the Massey University Human Ethics Committee.

Available Online: 2021-04-26

Abstract

Abstract

In 2013 a new collaborative center was established in Wellington, New Zealand to focus on integrating resilience research with the region’s community disaster resilience strategy. An earlier study with parties to this center had indicated that researcher and practitioner groups were divided by attention to their own immediate knowledge and skills, but agreed there was a need to maximize community resilience benefits amongst a regional population. An action research workshop of researchers and practitioners used a visual logic model to focus on the pragmatic benefits of improving community resilience. The visual logic model was used to design research activities that would improve the regional community resilience strategy, which was still in an early implementation phase. Ten of 14 workshop participants were interviewed following the workshop. Statistical content analysis of interview data highlighted certain strengths of the action research process: visual monitoring and evaluation planning was a catalyst for complicated conversations between two very different groups of professionals; and researchers became more focused on practical issues as a result. Other findings suggested that in future collaborative research governance would benefit from wider cycles of strategic intelligence, enhanced research contributions, and the use of different information formats for different purposes. Different formats for different purposes should also be considered when developing and implementing large-scale disaster risk reduction policies and strategies.
- Collaborative research,
- Community resilience,
- Content analysis,
- Emergency management,
- Visual communication

FullText(HTML)

References(42)

References

Ackroyd, S., and S. Fleetwood. 2010. Realism in contemporary organisation and management studies. In Realist perspectives on management and organisation, ed. S. Ackroyd and S. Fleetwood, 3–25. London: Routledge.

Béné, C., R.G. Wood, A. Newsham, and M. Davies. 2012. Resilience: New utopia or new tyranny? Reflection about the potentials and limits of the concept of resilience in relation to vulnerability reduction programmes. Brighton: Institute of Development Studies.

Birkmann, J., D. Chang Seng, T. Abeling, N. Huq, J. Wolfertz, N. Karanci, and S. Jϋlich. 2012. Systematization of different concepts, quality criteria, and indicators. Brussels: Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters.

Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3(2): 77–101.

Burton, C.G. 2012. The development of metrics for community resilience to natural disasters. A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of doctor of philosophy. South Carolina: University of South Carolina. http://webra.cas.sc.edu/hvri/education/docs/Chris_Burton_2012.pdf. Accessed 1 Oct 2013.

Carr, S.C. 1996. Effects of unreasonable pay discrepancies for under-and overpayment on double demotivation. Genetic Social and General Psychology Monographs 122(4): 477–494. http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/vzpm20#.VMf2wC7oO_R. Accessed 4 May 2015.

Clegg, C., and S. Walsh. 2004. Change management: Time for a change. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology 13(2): 217–239.

Costello, N. 2000. Routines, strategy and change in high-technology firms. In Realist perspectives on management and organisation, ed. S. Ackroyd and S. Fleetwood, 161–181. London: Routledge.

Dey, I. 1993. Qualitative data analysis. New York: Routledge.

Duignan, P. 2012a. Overview of outcomes theory. www.strategicevaluation.info/ot/index.html. Accessed 15 Nov 2012.

Duignan, P. 2012b. Stop the terminological madness now! “Outcomes”, “impact”, “results”, “goals” and the Buffalo Dung Problem. http://outcomesblog.org/2012/08/15/stop-the-terminological-madness-now-outcomes-impact-results-goals-and-the-buffalo-dung-problem/. Accessed 10 Feb 2013.

Duignan, P. 2013. Faster monitoring and evaluation (M&E) planning. http://www.outcomescentral.org/dplan/eval.html. Accessed 15 Feb 2013.

Faigman, D.L. 1989. To have and have not: Assessing the value of social science to the law as science and policy. Emery Law Journal 1(1): 1005–1096.

Huggins, T.J., and L.M. Jones. 2012. Visually modelling New Zealand conservation strategy: A study of user experiences. Ecopsychology 4(4): 286–296.

Huggins, T.J., and R. Peace. 2014. Visually planning sustainability research: A case study of interdisciplinary collaboration. Sustainability—The Journal of Record 7(4): 209–219.

Huggins, T.J., R. Peace, S.R. Hill, D.M. Johnston, and A. Cuevas. (2015). Politics of practical and academic knowledge: A Q-method analysis of gauging community disaster resilience. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management. doi: 10.1111/1468-5973.12092.

IRDR (Integrated Research on Disaster Risk). 2013. Strategic plan 2013–2017. IRDR International. http://www.irdrinternational.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/IRDR-Strategic-Plan-2013-2017.pdf. Accessed 1 Jun 2014.

IRDR (Integrated Research on Disaster Risk). 2014. International Centres of Excellence (ICoEs). IRDR International. http://www.irdrinternational.org/about/structure/icoes/. Accessed 1 Jun 2014.

JCDR (Joint Centre for Disaster Research). 2014. International Centre of Excellence in Community Resilience: Wellington. Information sheet. Wellington: Joint Centre for Disaster Research.

Kampen, J.K., and P. Tamás. 2014. Overly ambitious: Contributions and current status of Q-methodology. Quality and Quantity 48(6): 3109–3126.

Kessell, A., and B. Tversky. 2009. Thinking about cycles: Producing sequences but preferring circles. California: Stanford University.

Klingner, J., B. Tversky, and P. Hanrahan. 2010. Effects of visual and verbal presentation on cognitive load in vigilance, memory, and arithmetic tasks. Psychophysiology 48(3): 323–332.

Krizan, L. 1999. Occasional paper number six: Intelligence essentials for everyone. Washington DC: Joint Military Intelligence College.

Kapucu, N. 2009. Disaster and emergency management systems in urban areas. Cities 29: S41–S49.

Landis, J.R., and G.G. Koch. 1977. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33(1): 159–174.

Local Government New Zealand. 2014. Managing natural hazard risk in New Zealand—Towards more resilient communities. Wellington: Local Government New Zealand.

Marks, D.F., and L. Yardley. 2004. Content and thematic analysis. In Research methods for clinical and health psychology, ed. D.F. Marks and L. Yardley, 56–68. London: Sage.

McBean, G.A. 2012. Integrating disaster risk reduction towards sustainable development. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 4(1): 122–127.

Owen, C., C. Bearman, B. Brooks, J. Chapman, D. Paton, and L. Hossain. 2013. Developing a research framework for complex multi-team coordination in emergency management. International Journal of Emergency Management 9(1): 1–15.

Parkinson, S. 2009. Power and perceptions in participatory monitoring and evaluation. Evaluation and Program Planning 32(3): 229–237.

Porter, S. 2000. Critical realist ethnography. The case of racism and professionalism in a medical setting. In Realist perspectives on management and organisation, ed. S. Ackroyd and S. Fleetwood, 141–160. London: Routledge.

Rogers, P.J. 2008. Using programme theory to evaluate complicated and complex aspects of interventions. Evaluation 14(1): 29–48.

Roorda, M., and H. Nunns. 2009. Lifting the lens: Developing a logic for a complicated policy. Evaluation Journal of Australasia 9(2): 24–32.

Stroud, N.J., and V. de Macedo Higgins. 2009. Content analysis. In Research methods in communication, ed. S. Zhou and W.M.D. Sloan, 123–143. Northport, AL: Vision Press.

Todd, P.M., and G. Gigerenzer. 2003. Bounding rationality to the world. Journal of Economic Philosophy 24(2): 143–165.

Tversky, B. 2011. Visualizing thought. Topics in Cognitive Science 3(3): 499–535.

UNISDR (United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction). 2013. Information and knowledge management for disaster risk reduction (IKM4DRR) framework and scorecard. Geneva: Information and Knowledge Management for Disaster Risk Reduction, UNISDR.

UNISDR (United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction). 2014. Progress and challenges in disaster risk reduction: A contribution towards the development of policy indicators for the post-2015 framework for disaster risk reduction. http://www.unisdr.org/files/40967_40967progressandchallengesindisaste.pdf. Accessed 27 Apr 2015.

UNISDR (United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction). 2015. Sendai framework for disaster risk reduction 2015–2030. http://www.wcdrr.org/preparatory/post2015. Accessed 04 Sept 2015.

Wilson, H.S. 1985. Qualitative studies: From observations to explanation. Journal of Nursing Administration 15(5): 812.

Wolf, A. 2014. The Interview in Q-methodology: Readiness to adopt sustainable responses to climate change. Sage research methods cases. http://srmo.sagepub.com/cases. Accessed 15 Oct 2014.

WREMO (Wellington Region Emergency Management Office). 2012. Community resilience strategy. November 2012. Wellington, New Zealand: Wellington Region Emergency Management Office.

Relative Articles

Supplements(0)

Cited By

Proportional views