Natt Leelawat, Anawat Suppasri, Fumihiko Imamura. Disaster Recovery and Reconstruction Following the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake and Tsunami: A Business Process Management Perspective[J]. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2015, 6(3): 310-314. doi: 10.1007/s13753-015-0066-1
Citation: Natt Leelawat, Anawat Suppasri, Fumihiko Imamura. Disaster Recovery and Reconstruction Following the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake and Tsunami: A Business Process Management Perspective[J]. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2015, 6(3): 310-314. doi: 10.1007/s13753-015-0066-1

Disaster Recovery and Reconstruction Following the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake and Tsunami: A Business Process Management Perspective

doi: 10.1007/s13753-015-0066-1
Funds:

and the editor and all four anonymous reviewers for their useful comments and suggestions.

The authors would like to acknowledge the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, the Academy for Co-creative Education of Environment and Energy Science (ACEEES) of Tokyo Institute of Technology, and the International Research Institute of Disaster Science (IRIDeS) of Tohoku University for this research opportunity, as well as the Director of Disaster Prevention Division, the Chief of Planning Subdivision, Disaster Prevention Division, and the First Chief of Policy Division from the Tohoku Regional Bureau of the MLIT for their collaboration. The authors would also like to acknowledge Prof. Junichi Iijima and Iijima Laboratory (Tokyo Tech)

  • Available Online: 2021-04-26
  • The Tohoku Regional Bureau (TRB) of the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism (MLIT) performed various actions in response to the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake and Tsunami. The total disaster recovery and reconstruction period is expected to last for 10 years, of which the first five years are regarded as the concentrated reconstruction period. As of 2013, a majority of the mega projects that involved restoration actions have been completed, which indicates a more effective rate of completion compared with the MLIT projects performed in normal non-disaster situations. This short article explains the management process of the recovery and reconstruction utilized by the TRB—an inter-organizational process—from a business process management (BPM) perspective and creates a simple organization construction diagram of the entire process. The study focused on the transactions and actor roles to identify their strengths. The findings indicate the utilization of different operational procedures in some parts of the process, the importance of liaison role, as well as some obstacles. The lessons learned from this analysis can assist managers and researchers in designing and managing restoration processes for future disasters.
  • loading
  • Dietz, J.L.G. 2006. Enterprise ontology—Theory and methodology. Berling: Springer.
    GOJ (Government of Japan). 2011. Basic act on reconstruction in response to the Great East Japan Earthquake. Tokyo: GOJ.
    IDI (Infrastructure Development Institute—Japan). 2011. The restorations from the Great East Japan Earthquake and Tsunami. IDI Quarterly 56: 1–12.
    IRP (International Recovery Platform), T. Tanaka, Y. Shiozaki, A. Hokugo, and S. Bettencourt. 2013. Reconstruction policy and planning. Washington, DC: World Bank.
    Maly, E., and Y. Shiozaki. 2012. Towards a policy that supports people-centered housing recovery—Learning from housing reconstruction after the Hanshin-Awaji Earthquake in Kobe, Japan. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science 3(1): 56–65.
    Marjanovic, O., and P. Hallikainen. 2013. Disaster recovery—New challenges and opportunities for business process management research and practice. Pacific Asia Journal of the Assocication for Information Systems 5(1): 23–44.
    Mileti, D.S. 1999. Disaster by design: A reassessment of natural hazards in the United States. Washington, DC: Joseph Henry Press.
    MLIT (Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism). 2012. White paper on land, infrastructure, transport and tourism in Japan, 2011. Tokyo: MLIT.
    MLIT (Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism). 2013. White paper on land, infrastructure, transport and tourism in Japan, 2012. Tokyo: MLIT.
    Murosaki, Y. 2007. Lessons on reconstruction strategies from the Great Hanshin-Awaji Earthquake. Journal of Disaster Research 2(5): 330–334.
    NPA (National Police Agency). 2011. Damage condition of the 2011 earthquake off the Pacific coast of Tohoku. http://www.npa.go.jp/archive/keibi/biki/higaijokyo.pdf. Accessed 26 Jul 2013 (in Japanese).
    Perinforma, A.P.C. 2012. The essence of organisation. South Holland: Sapio Enterprise Engineering.
    Reconstruction Agency. 2011. Basic guidelines for reconstruction in response to the Great East Japan Earthquake. Tokyo: Reconstruction Agency.
    Sasaki, K. 2013. Three years into reconstruction. Current status and prospects. Tokyo: Institute for International Studies and Training. http://www.iist.or.jp/en-m/2013/0220-0894/. Accessed 2 Apr 2014.
    TRB (Tohoku Regional Bureau), Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism (MLIT). 2013. Response of Tohoku Regional Bureau, MLIT, to the Great East Japan Earthquake. Miyagi: TRB.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (56) PDF downloads(0) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return