Citation: | Iuliana Armaş, Dragos Toma-Danila, Radu Ionescu, Alexandru Gavriş. Vulnerability to Earthquake Hazard: Bucharest Case Study, Romania[J]. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2017, 8(2): 182-195. doi: 10.1007/s13753-017-0132-y |
Armaş, I. 2006. Earthquake risk perception in Bucharest, Romania. Risk Analysis 26(5):1223-1234.
|
Armaş, I. 2008. Social vulnerability and seismic risk perception. Case study:The historic center of the Bucharest Municipality/Romania. Natural Hazards 47(3):397-410.
|
Armaş, I. 2012. Multi-criteria vulnerability analysis to earthquake hazard of Bucharest, Romania. Natural Hazards 63(2):1129-1158.
|
Armaş, I., and E. Avram. 2008. Patterns and trends in the perception of the seismic risk. Case study:Bucharest Municipality/Romania. Natural Hazards 44(1):147-161.
|
Armaş, I., and A. Gavriş. 2013. Social vulnerability assessment using spatial multi-criteria analysis (SEVI model) and the Social Vulnerability Index (SoVI model)-A case study for Bucharest, Romania. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences 13:1481-1499.
|
Armaş, I., and M. Radulian. 2014. Spatial multi-criteria risk assessment for earthquake hazards in Bucharest, Romania. In Earthquake hazard impact and urban planning, ed. Dan M. Boştenaru, I. Armaş, and A. Goretti, 127-149. Dordrecht:Springer.
|
Armaş, I., and A. Gavriş. 2016. Census-based social vulnerability assessment for Bucharest. Procedia Environmental Sciences 32:138-146.
|
Balan, S.F., D. Toma-Danila, and B.F. Apostol. 2016. Reinforced concrete buildings behaviour in the Metropolis of Bucharest during strong earthquakes in Romania. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Urban Risks ICUR2016, 149-155. 30 June-2 July 2016, Lisbon, Portugal.
|
Birkmann, J. 2006. Measuring vulnerability to promote disaster resilient societies:Conceptual frameworks and definitions. Tokyo:United Nations University Press.
|
Blaikie, P., T. Cannon, I. Davis, and B. Wisner. 1994. At risk:Natural hazards, people's vulnerability, and disasters. London:Routledge.
|
Bucharest General Municipality. 2016. List of buildings technically evaluated and classified into seismic risk classes. http://www.pmb.ro/servicii/alte_informatii/lista_imobilelor_exp/docs/Lista_imobilelor_expertizate.pdf. Accessed 29 Dec 2016.
|
Chen, Y., J. Yu, and S. Khan. 2010. Spatial sensitivity analysis of multi-criteria weights in GIS-based land suitability evaluation. Environmental Modelling and Software 25(12):1582-1591.
|
Chen, M., M.D. Wood, C. Linstead, and E. Maltby. 2011. Uncertainty analysis in a GIS-based multicriteria analysis tool for river catchment management. Environmental Modelling and Software 26(4):395-405.
|
Crosetto, M., S. Tarantola, and A. Saltelli. 2000. Sensitivity and uncertainty analysis in spatial modelling based on GIS. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 81:71-79.
|
Crosetto, M., and S. Tarantola. 2001. Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis:Tools for GIS based model implementation. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 15(5):415-437.
|
Coppola, D. 2007. Introduction to disaster management. Burlington, MA:Elsevier.
|
Duzgun, H.S.B., M.S. Yucemen, H.S. Kalaycioglu, K. Celik, S. Kemec, K. Ertugay, and A. Deniz. 2011. An integrated earthquake vulnerability assessment framework for urban areas. Natural Hazards 59(2):917-947. doi: 10.1007/s11069-011-9808-6.
|
Erdik, M., K. Şeşetyan, M.B. Demircioğlu, U. Hancılar, and C. Zülfikar. 2011. Rapid earthquake loss assessment after damaging earthquakes. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 31(2):247-266.
|
Eurostat. 2014. Housing condition report. http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Housing_conditions. Accessed 12 Jan 2017.
|
Feizizadeh, B., T. Blaschke, and H. Nazmfar. 2014. GIS-based ordered weighted averaging and Dempster Shafer methods for landslide susceptibility mapping in Urmia lake basin, Iran. International Journal of Digital Earth 7(8):688-708.
|
Fekete, A. 2009. Validation of a social vulnerability index in context to river-floods in Germany. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences 9(2):393-403.
|
FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency). 2014. HAZUS-MH:Multi-hazard loss estimation methodology. http://www.fema.gov/hazus. Accessed 11 Jun 2017.
|
Giardini, D., J. Woessner, L. Danciu, F. Cotton, H. Crowley, G. Grünthal, R. Pinho, G. Valensise, and the SHARE consortium. 2013. Seismic hazard harmonization in Europe (SHARE):Online data resource. doi: 10.12686/SED-00000001-SHARE.
|
Gu, D., P. Gerland, F. Pelletier, and B. Cohen. 2015. Risks of exposure and vulnerability to natural disasters at the city level:A global overview. United Nations Technical Paper No. 2015/2. New York:United Nations.
|
Hinkel, J. 2011. Indicators of vulnerability and adaptive capacity:Towards a clarification of the science-policy interface. Global Environmental Change 21(1):198-208.
|
INS (National Institute of Statistics), Romania. 2017. Results of the 2011 population and housing national census. http://www.recensamantromania.ro/rezultate-2. Accessed 11 Jun 2017.
|
Ionescu, C., R. Klein, J. Hinkel, K. Kavi Kumar, and R. Klein. 2009. Towards a formal framework of vulnerability to climate change. Environmental Modelling and Assessment 14(1):1-16.
|
ITC (International Institute for Aerospace Survey and Earth Sciences). 2001. ILWIS 3.0 user's guide. http://52north.org/communities/ilwis/ilwis-open/user-guide. Accessed 20 Jan 2017.
|
Janssen, R., and M. van Herwijnen. 1994. DEFINITE A system to support on a finite set of alternatives (Software package and user manual). Dodrecht:Kulwer Academic Publishers.
|
Karimzadeh, S., B. Feizizadeh, and M. Matsuoka. 2017. From a GIS-based hybrid site condition map to an earthquake damage assessment in Iran:Methods and trends. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 22:23-36.
|
Kasperson, J., and R. Kasperson. 2005. The social contours of risk:Risk analysis, corporations and the globalization of risk. London:Earthscan.
|
Lang, D., S. Molina-Palacios, C. Lindholm, and S.F. Balan. 2012. Deterministic earthquake damage and loss assessment for the city of Bucharest, Romania. Journal of Seismology 16(1):67-88.
|
Marquis, F., J.J. Kim, J.K. Elwood, and S.E. Chang. 2015. Understanding post-earthquake decisions on multi-storey concrete buildings in Christchurch, New Zealand. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 15(2). doi: 10.1007/s10518-015-9772-8.
|
Marmureanu, G., C.O. Cioflan, and A. Marmureanu. 2010. Researches on local seismic hazard (microzonation) for metropolitan Bucharest area. Iasi:Tehnopress (in Romanian).
|
Molina, S., D.H. Lang, C.D. Lindholm, and F. Lingvall. 2010. User manual for the earthquake loss estimation tool:SELENA. http://selena.sourceforge.net. Accessed 11 Jun 2017.
|
Necula, G.C., S. McPeak, and W. Weimer. 2002. CCured:Type-safe retrofitting of legacy code. ACM SIGPLAN Notices 37(1):128-139.
|
NIEP (National Institute for Earth Physics), Romania. 2016. BIGSEES Project's earthquake catalog. http://bigsees.infp.ro/Results.html. Accessed 29 Dec 2016.
|
Ouma, Y., E.C. Kipkorir, and R. Tateishi. 2011. MCDA-GIS integrated approach for optimized landfill site selection for growing urban regions:An application of neighborhood-proximity analysis. Annals of GIS, 17(1):43-62.
|
Pavel, F., and R. Vacareanu. 2016. Scenario-based earthquake risk assessment for Bucharest, Romania. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 20:138-144.
|
Pavel, F., R. Vacareanu, J. Douglas, M. Radulian, C.O. Cioflan, and A.H. Barbat. 2016. An updated probabilistic seismic hazard assessment for Romania and comparison with the approach and outcomes of the SHARE Project. Pure and Applied Geophysics 173(6):1881-1905.
|
Ravalico, J.K., G.C. Dandy, and H.R. Maier. 2010. Management Option Rank Equivalence (MORE) a new method of sensitivity analysis for decision-making. Environmental Modelling and Software 25(2):171-181.
|
Rufat, S. 2009 From mural map to GIS:Mapping urban vulnerability in Bucharest. In Urban and regional data management:UDMS, ed. A. Krek, M. Rumor, S. Zlatanova, and E. Fendel, 301-313. London:Taylor and Francis Group.
|
Saaty, T.L. 1980. The analytic hierarchy process. New York:McGraw Hill.
|
Saltelli, A., S. Tarantola, and F. Campolongo. 2000. Sensitivity analysis as an ingredient of modelling. Statistical Science 15(4):377-395.
|
Sterlacchini, S., S.O. Akbas, J. Blahut, O.C. Mavrouli, C. Garcia, B.Q. Luna, and J. Corominas. 2014. Methods for the characterization of the vulnerability of elements at risk. In Mountain risks:From prediction to management and governance, ed. T. Asch, J. Corominas, S. Greiving, J.P. Malet, and S. Sterlacchini, 233-273. Dordrecht:Springer.
|
Strasser, F.O., J.J. Bommer, K. Sesetyan, M. Erdik, Z. Cagnan, J. Irizarry, X. Goula, A. Lucantoni, F. Sabetta, I.E. Bal, H. Crowley, and C. Lindholm. 2008. A comparative study of European earthquake loss estimation tools for a scenario in Istanbul. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 12(2):246-256.
|
Thywissen, K. 2006. Core terminology of disaster reduction:A comparative glossary. In Measuring vulnerability to natural hazards:Towards disaster resilient societies, ed. J. Birkmann, 448-496. New York:United Nations University Press.
|
Toma-Danila, D., and I. Armas. 2017. Insights on the possible seismic damage of residential buildings in Bucharest, Romania, at neighborhood resolution. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 15(3):1161-1184.
|
Toma-Danila, D., C. Zulfikar, E.F. Manea, and C.O. Cioflan. 2015a. Improved seismic risk estimation for Bucharest, based on multiple hazard scenarios and analytical methods. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 73:1-16.
|
Toma-Danila, D., C.O. Cioflan, S.F. Balan, and E.F. Manea. 2015b. Characteristics and results of the near real-time system for estimating the seismic damage in Romania. Mathematical Modelling in Civil Engineering 11(1):33-41.
|
Trendafiloski, G., M. Wyss, P. Rosset, and G. Marmureanu. 2009. Constructing city models to estimate losses due to earthquakes worldwide:Application to Bucharest, Romania. Earthquake Spectra 25(3):665-685.
|
Turner, B., R. Kasperson, P. Matson, J. McCarthy, R. Corell, L. Christensen, N. Eckley, J. Kasperson, A. Luers, M.L. Martello, C. Polsky, A. Pulsipher, and A. Schiller. 2003. A framework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 100(14):8074-8079.
|
USGS (United States Geological Survey). 2016. Earthquake statistics-Worldwide earthquakes 2000-2015. https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/browse/stats.php. Accessed 10 Jun 2017.
|
van der Veen, A., E. Dopheide, D. Parker, S. Tapsell, J. Handmer, C. Gregg, C. Bonadonna, and F. Ferrara. 2009. State-of-art on vulnerability of socio-economic systems. Del. 1.1.3 of the ENSURE EC FP7. Project:Methodologies to assess vulnerability of structural, territorial and economic systems. Brussels:European Commission.
|
Walker, B.B., C. Taylor-Noonan, A. Tabbernor, T. McKinnon, H. Dal, D. Bradley, N. Schuurman, and J.J. Clague. 2014. A multi-criteria evaluation model of earthquake vulnerability in Victoria, British Columbia. Natural Hazards 74(2):1209-1222.
|