Xiao-Bing Hu, Peijun Shi, Ming Wang, Tao Ye, Mark S. Leeson, Sander E. van der Leeuw, Jianguo Wu, Ortwin Renn, Carlo Jaeger. Towards Quantitatively Understanding the Complexity of Social-Ecological Systems—From Connection to Consilience[J]. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2017, 8(4): 343-356. doi: 10.1007/s13753-017-0146-5
Citation: Xiao-Bing Hu, Peijun Shi, Ming Wang, Tao Ye, Mark S. Leeson, Sander E. van der Leeuw, Jianguo Wu, Ortwin Renn, Carlo Jaeger. Towards Quantitatively Understanding the Complexity of Social-Ecological Systems—From Connection to Consilience[J]. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2017, 8(4): 343-356. doi: 10.1007/s13753-017-0146-5

Towards Quantitatively Understanding the Complexity of Social-Ecological Systems—From Connection to Consilience

doi: 10.1007/s13753-017-0146-5
  • Available Online: 2021-04-26
  • The complexity of social-ecological systems (SES) is rooted in the outcomes of node activities connected by network topology. Thus far, in network dynamics research, the connectivity degree (CND), indicating how many nodes are connected to a given node, has been the dominant concept. However, connectivity focuses only on network topology, neglecting the crucial relation to node activities, and thereby leaving system outcomes largely unexplained. Inspired by the phenomenon of "consensus of wills and coordination of activities" often observed in disaster risk management, we propose a new concept of network characteristic, the consilience degree (CSD), aiming to measure the way in which network topology and node activities together contribute to system outcomes. The CSD captures the fact that nodes may assume different states that make their activities more or less compatible. Connecting two nodes with in/compatible states will lead to outcomes that are un/desirable from the perspective of the SES in question. We mathematically prove that the CSD is a generalized CND, and the CND is a special case of CSD. As a general, fundamental concept, the CSD can facilitate the development of a new framework of network properties, models, and theories that allows us to understand patterns of network behavior that cannot be explained in terms of connectivity alone. We further demonstrate that a co-evolutionary mechanism can naturally improve the CSD. Given the generality of co-evolution in SES, we argue that the CSD is an inherent attribute rather than an artificial concept, which underpins the fundamental importance of the CSD to the study of SES.
  • loading
  • Adger, N. 2006. Vulnerability. Global Environmental Change 16(3):268-281.
    Aiello, W., F. Chung, and L. Lu. 2000. A random graph model for massive graphs. In Proceedings of the 32nd ACM Symposium on the Theory of Computing, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 21-23 May 2000, 171-180.
    Albert, R., and A.L. Barabási. 2002. Statistical mechanics of complex networks. Reviews of Modern Physics 74(1):47-97.
    Alexander, S.M., D. Armitage, and A. Charles. 2015. Social networks and transitions to co-management in Jamaican marine reserves and small-scale fisheries. Global Environmental Change 35:213-225.
    Aoki, T., and T. Aoyagi. 2012. Scale-free structures emerging from co-evolution of a network and the distribution of a diffusive resource on it. Physical Review Letters 109(20):208702.
    Ball, P. 2012. Why society is a complex matter-Meeting twenty-first century challenges with a new kind of science. Berlin:Springer.
    Barabási, A.L., and R. Albert. 1999. Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science 286(5439):509-512.
    Bernauer, T., R. Gampfer, T. Meng, and Y.S. Su. 2016. Could more civil society involvement increase public support for climate policy-making? Evidence from a survey experiment in China. Global Environmental Change 40:1-12.
    Blaabjerg, F., R. Teodorescu, M. Liserre, and A.V. Timbus. 2006. Overview of control and grid synchronization for distributed power generation systems. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics 53(5):1398-1409.
    Boccaletti, S., V. Latora, Y. Moreno, M. Chaves, and D.U. Hwang. 2006. Complex networks:Structure and dynamics. Physics Reports 424(4-5):175-308.
    Bodin, Ö., and D. Nohrstedt. 2016. Formation and performance of collaborative disaster management networks:Evidence from a Swedish wildfire response. Global Environmental Change 41:183-194.
    Burghouwt, G., J. Hakfoort, and J.R. van Eck. 2003. The spatial configuration of airline networks in Europe. Journal of Air Transport Management 9(5):309-323.
    Caldarelli, G., A. Capocci, P. De Los Rios, and M.A. Muñoz. 2002. Scale-free networks from varying vertex intrinsic fitness. Physical Review Letters 89(25):148-168.
    Callaway, D.S., M.E.J. Newman, S.H. Strogatz, and D.J. Watts. 2000. Network robustness and fragility:Percolation on random graphs. Physical Review Letters 85(25):5468-5471.
    Cohen, R., K. Erez, D.B. Avraham, and S. Havlin. 2001. Breakdown of the Internet under intentional attack. Physical Review Letters 86(16):3682-3685.
    Cox, M., S. Villamayor-Tomas, G. Epstein, L. Evans, N.C. Ban, F. Fleischman, M. Nenadovic, and G. Garcia-Lopez. 2016. Synthesizing theories of natural resource management and governance. Global Environmental Change 39:45-56.
    Daido, H., and K. Nakanishi. 2004. Aging transition and universal scaling in oscillator networks. Physical Review Letters 93(10):104101.
    Helbing, D. 2013. Globally networked risks and how to respond. Nature 497(7447):51-59.
    Hric, D., T.P. Peixoto, and S. Fortunato. 2016. Network structure, metadata and the prediction of missing nodes and annotations. Physical Review X 6:031038.
    Hu, X.B., P.J. Shi, M. Wang, T. Ye, and M.S. Leeson. 2014. Consilience degree-A new network property to evaluate system's performance against disturbances. Science China-Information Sciences 44(11):1467-1481 (in Chinese).
    Huberman, B.A., and L.A. Adamic. 1999. Growth dynamics of the world-wide web. Nature 401(6749):131.
    Lee, H., and all members of Editorial Board. 2009. Notes from editors. Consilience:The Journal of Sustainable Development 1(1). doi: 10.7916/D8X34XZP.
    Nardini, C., B. Kozma, and A. Barrat. 2008. Who's talking first? Consensus or lack thereof in coevolving opinion formation models. Physical Review Letters 100(15):158701.
    Newman, M.E.J. 2002. Assortative mixing in networks. Physical Review Letters 89(20):208701.
    OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). 2011. A strategy toolkit for future global shocks, International Futures Programme, OECD Report. Paris:OECD.
    Ostrom, E. 2009. A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems. Science 325(5939):419-422.
    Pastor-Satorras, R., and A. Vespignani. 2001. Epidemic spreading in scale-free networks. Physical Review Letters 86(14):3200-3203.
    Peel, L., D.B. Larremore, and A. Clauset. 2017. The ground truth about metadata and community detection in networks. Science Advances 3(5):e1602548.
    Peyton Young, H. 1998. Individual strategy and social structure:An evolutionary theory of institutions. Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press.
    Shi, P.J., M. Wang, X.B. Hu, and T. Ye. 2014. Integrated risk governance consilience mode of social-ecological systems. Acta Geographica Sinica 69(6):863-876 (in Chinese).
    Tanaka, G., K. Morino, and K. Aihara. 2012. Dynamical robustness in complex networks:The crucial role of low-degree nodes. Scientific Reports 2:Article 232.
    Watts, D.J., and S.H. Strogatz. 1998. Collective dynamics of "small world" networks. Nature 393(6684):440-442.
    Wilson, E.O. 1999. Consilience:Unity of knowledge. New York:Vintage Books.
    Wilson, E.O. 2009. A note to consilience readers. Consilience:The Journal of Sustainable Development 1(1). doi: 10.7916/D8X63NBZ.
    Young, O.R. 2010. Institutional dynamics:Resilience, vulnerability and adaptation in environmental and resource regimes. Global Environmental Change 20(3):378-385.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (65) PDF downloads(0) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return