Barriers and Facilitators in Interorganizational Disaster Response: Identifying Examples Across Europe

Claudia Berchtold; Maike Vollmer; Philip Sendrowski; Florian Neisser; Larissa M&#252;ller; Sonja Grigoleit

doi:10.1007/s13753-020-00249-y

Article Contents

Article Navigation > International Journal of Disaster Risk Science > 2020 > 11(1): 46-58

Claudia Berchtold, Maike Vollmer, Philip Sendrowski, Florian Neisser, Larissa Müller, Sonja Grigoleit. Barriers and Facilitators in Interorganizational Disaster Response: Identifying Examples Across Europe[J]. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2020, 11(1): 46-58. doi: 10.1007/s13753-020-00249-y

Citation:

Claudia Berchtold, Maike Vollmer, Philip Sendrowski, Florian Neisser, Larissa Müller, Sonja Grigoleit. Barriers and Facilitators in Interorganizational Disaster Response: Identifying Examples Across Europe[J]. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2020, 11(1): 46-58. doi: 10.1007/s13753-020-00249-y

Citation:

Claudia Berchtold, Maike Vollmer, Philip Sendrowski, Florian Neisser, Larissa Müller, Sonja Grigoleit. Barriers and Facilitators in Interorganizational Disaster Response: Identifying Examples Across Europe[J]. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2020, 11(1): 46-58. doi: 10.1007/s13753-020-00249-y

PDF

Barriers and Facilitators in Interorganizational Disaster Response: Identifying Examples Across Europe

doi: 10.1007/s13753-020-00249-y

Department for Technology Analysis and Strategic Planning(TASP), Fraunhofer Institute for Technological Trend Analysis, 53879 Euskirchen, Germany

Funds:

This research has been part of the IN-PREP project on developing an integrated next generation preparedness program for improving effective interorganizational response capacity in complex environments of disasters and causes of crises. It has received funding from Horizon 2020, the European Union's Programme for Research and Innovation under grant agreement No. 740627.

Available Online: 2021-04-26

Abstract

Abstract

Disaster response actors are facing new challenges, which encompass not only new and ever more complex threats but also the need to collaborate across organizational boundaries and even state borders. Depending on scale, these interactions have to work across governance setups, political and legal conditions, organizational cultures, as well as personal preferences and experiences that vary among actors, organizations, and countries. But which concrete measures are taken by crisis management actors at different scales to bridge these challenges and which of these could serve others as example to address comparable challenges in their contexts? This study made attempts to analyze whether certain solutions across organizations and states exist that facilitate effective interorganizational crisis management in the member states of the European Union (EU). It is based on selected expert interviews with representatives of different types of disaster response organizations (health services, police services, fire services, and other crisis management organizations) from seven EU member states (Germany, Netherlands, United Kingdom, Ireland, Italy, Austria, and Greece).
- Disaster response,
- European union,
- Interorganizational crisis management,
- Transboundary cooperation

FullText(HTML)

References(37)

References

Ansell, C., and A. Boin. 2019. Taming deep uncertainty:The potential of pragmatist principles for understanding and improving strategic crisis management. Administration & Society 51(7):1079.

Balcik, B., and B.M. Beamon. 2008. Facility location in humanitarian relief. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications 11(2):101.

Beighley, M., and A.C. Hyde. 2018. Portugal wildfire management in a new era:Assessing fire risks, resources and reforms. Independent Report. https://www.isa.ulisboa.pt/files/cef/pub/articles/2018-04/2018_Portugal_Wildfire_Management_in_a_New_Era_Engish.pdf. Accessed 3 Feb 2020.

BMI (Bundesministerium des Innern/Federal Ministry of the Interior). 2015. System of crisis management in Germany (System des Krisenmanagements in Deutschland). https://www.bmi.bund.de/SharedDocs/downloads/DE/publikationen/themen/bevoelkerungsschutz/krisenmanagement-in-deutschland.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=1. Accessed 30 Jun 2019 (in German).

Boersma, K., P. Wagenaar, and J. Wolbers. 2012. Negotiating the ‘trading zone’. Creating a shared information infrastructure in the Dutch public safety sector. Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management 9(2):Article 785.

Boin, A. 2019. The transboundary crisis:Why we are unprepared and the road ahead. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management 27(1):94.

Boin, A., and F. Bynander. 2015. Explaining success and failure in crisis coordination. Geografiska Annaler:Series A, Physical Geography 97(1):123.

Boin, A., M. Rhinard, and M. Ekengren. 2014. Managing transboundary crises. The emergence of European Union capacity. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management 22(3):131.

Boin, A., P.'t Hart, E. Stern, and B. Sundelius. 2017. The politics of crisis management:Public leadership under pressure, 2nd edn. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.

Chief Fire Officers Association, Association of Ambulance Chief Executives, and National Police Chiefs' Council. 2016. Joint doctrine:The interoperability framework. UK:JESIP (Joint Emergency Services Interoperability Principles). https://www.jesip.org.uk/uploads/media/pdf/Joint%20Doctrine/JESIP_Joint_Doctrine_Document.pdf. Accessed 3 May 2019.

COMM/DG/UNIT. 2018. The largest EU civil protection operation helps Sweden fight forest fires-European Civil Protection and Humanitarian Aid Operations-European Commission. https://ec.europa.eu/echo/news/largest-eu-civil-protection-operation-helps-sweden-fight-forest-fires_en. Accessed 10 Jan 2020.

COMM/DG/UNIT. 2019. Report:More countries than ever hit by forest fires. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/IP_19_6176. Accessed 10 Jan 2020.

Constantinides, P. 2013. The failure of foresight in crisis management:A secondary analysis of the Mari disaster. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 80(9):1657.

Dutch Ministry of Security and Justice. 2013. Safety Regions Act. https://www.government.nl/binaries/government/documents/decrees/2010/12/17/dutch-security-regions-act-part-i/safety-regions-act.pdf. Accessed 28 Apr 2019.

EC-DG ECHO (European Commission-Directorate-General for European Civil Protection and Humanitarian Aid Operations). 2017. Interim evaluation of the union civil protection mechanism, 2014-2016:Final report. https://ec.europa.eu/echo/sites/echo-site/files/ucpm_final_report.pdf. Accessed 16 Apr 2019.

EC-DG ECHO (European Commission-Directorate-General for European Civil Protection and Humanitarian Aid Operations). 2019a. ERCC:DG ECHO daily map 9/4/2019. https://erccportal.jrc.ec.europa.eu/Maps/Daily-maps#. 18.004.2019. Accessed 31 Jan 2020.

EC-DG ECHO (European Commission-Directorate-General for European Civil Protection and Humanitarian Aid Operations). 2019b. Experts training and exchange. https://ec.europa.eu/echo/what/civil-protection/experts-training-and-exchange_en. Accessed 20 Apr 2019.

Endsley, M.R. 1995. Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factors:The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 37(1):32-64.

European Commission. 2010. Risk assessment and mapping guidelines for disaster management. SEC(2010) 1626 final. https://ec.europa.eu/echo/files/about/COMM_PDF_SEC_2010_1626_F_staff_working_document_en.pdf. Accessed 3 Feb 2020.

European Commission. 2015. Risk management capability assessment guidelines. 2015/C 261/03 (C 261/5). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52015XC0808%2801%29. Accessed 3 Feb 2020.

Flick, U. 2004. Design and process in qualitative research. In A companion to qualitative research, ed. U. Flick, E. von Kardorff, and I. Steinke, 146-152. London:Sage Publications.

Flick, U. 2007. Designing qualitative research. London:Sage Publications.

Groenendaal, J., I. Helsloot, and A. Scholtens. 2013. A critical examination of the assumptions regarding centralized coordination in large-scale emergency situations. Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management 10(1):113-135.

Mayring, P. 2007. On generalization in qualitatively oriented research. Forum Qualitative Social Research 8(3):Article 26.

Mayring, P. 2014. Qualitative content analysis. Theoretical foundation, basic procedures and software solution. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-395173. Accessed 29 Jan 2020.

National Steering Group Ireland. 2017. A framework for major emergency management. http://mem.ie/. Accessed 18 Mar 2019.

Quarantelli, E.L. 1988. Disaster crisis management:A summary of research findings. Journal of Management Studies 25(4):373-385.

Radisch, J., C. Wendling, and S. Jaconzone. 2013. OECD working papers on public governance:The use of social media in risk and crisis communication. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/governance/the-use-of-social-media-in-risk-and-crisis-communication_5k3v01fskp9s-en. Accessed 3 Feb 2020.

Robinson, O. 2014. Sampling in interview-based qualitative research:A theoretical and practical guide. Qualitative Research in Psychology 11(1):25-41.

Rosenthal, U., M.T. Charles, and P.'t Hart. 1989. Coping with crisis:The management of disasters, riots and terrorism. Springfield:Charles C. Thomas Publisher.

Sapountzaki, K., S. Wanczura, G. Casertano, S. Greiving, G. Xanthopoulos, and F.F. Ferrara. 2011. Disconnected policies and actors and the missing role of spatial planning throughout the risk management cycle. Natural Hazards 59(3):1445-1474.

Stolk, D.J., R. Beerens, T. de Groeve, B. Hap, M. Kudrlova, D. Kyriazanos, M. Langinvainio, M. van der Lee, et al. 2012. ACRIMAS-D 5.1 approaches and solutions. https://www.acrimas.eu/attachments/article/5/D5-1_ACRIMAS_report_Approaches_Solutions.pdf. Accessed 12 Apr 2019.

Turco, M., S. Jerez, S. Augusto, P. Tarín-Carrasco, N. Ratola, P. Jiménez-Guerrero, and R.M. Trigo. 2019. Climate drivers of the 2017 devastating fires in Portugal. Scientific Reports 9(1):Article 13886.

UNISDR (United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction). 2009. UNISDR terminology on disaster risk reduction. Geneva:UNISDR.

UNISDR (United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction). 2018. Words into action. Man-made and technological hazards. https://www.undrr.org/publication/words-action-guideline-man-made/technological-hazards. Accessed 29 Jan 2020.

Waring, S., L. Alison, G. Carter, C. Barrett-Pink, M. Humann, L. Swan, and T. Zilinsky. 2018. Information sharing in interteam responses to disaster. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 91(3):591-619.

Wybo, J.-L., and K.M. Kowalski. 1998. Command centers and emergency management support. Safety Science 30(1-2):131-138.

Relative Articles

Supplements(0)

Cited By

Proportional views