Remembering, Forgetting, and Absencing Disasters in the Post-disaster Recovery Process

Charlotte Monteil; Jenni Barclay; Anna Hicks

doi:10.1007/s13753-020-00277-8

Article Contents

Article Navigation > International Journal of Disaster Risk Science > 2020 > 11(3): 287-299

Charlotte Monteil, Jenni Barclay, Anna Hicks. Remembering, Forgetting, and Absencing Disasters in the Post-disaster Recovery Process[J]. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2020, 11(3): 287-299. doi: 10.1007/s13753-020-00277-8

Citation:

Charlotte Monteil, Jenni Barclay, Anna Hicks. Remembering, Forgetting, and Absencing Disasters in the Post-disaster Recovery Process[J]. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2020, 11(3): 287-299. doi: 10.1007/s13753-020-00277-8

Citation:

PDF

Remembering, Forgetting, and Absencing Disasters in the Post-disaster Recovery Process

doi: 10.1007/s13753-020-00277-8

1 Lancaster Environment Center, Lancaster University, Bailrigg LA1 4YW, UK;
2 School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK;
3 Edinburgh Office, British Geological Survey, Edinburgh EH14 4BA, UK

Funds:

We express our gratitude to NERC (NE/L002585/1) and the University of East Anglia for supporting and funding this research.

Available Online: 2021-04-26

Abstract

Abstract

Sustainable post-disaster recovery implies learning from past experience in order to prevent recreating forms of vulnerability. Memory construction supports both the healing process and redevelopment plans. Hence, memory of disaster results from the balance between remembering, forgetting, and absencing elements of the disaster, and can be both a tool and an obstacle to sustainable recovery. We explore here how collective memory is built in a post-disaster context to respond to the needs of this critical period, and how it shapes recovery. This ethnographic study, conducted between 2015 and 2017, explores the recovery processes in Montserrat, a small Caribbean island affected by an extended volcanic crisis from 1995 to 2010. Although this study does not give tangible solutions for disaster risk reduction in a post-disaster context, it highlights potential obstacles for learning from a disaster and how they may be surmounted. We argue that it is crucial to acknowledge evolving collective memory in order to implement effective measures for preserving and sharing a shared understanding of disaster across generations and social groups in a way that supports disaster risk awareness. We also maintain that acknowledging the dilemma faced by authorities and disaster management agencies during a period of conflicting needs may encourage the reconsideration of risk framing, and hence reveal how to improve implementation of disaster risk reduction measures.
- Absencing risk information,
- Disaster remembering,
- Forgetting processes,
- Montserrat,
- Post-disaster recovery

FullText(HTML)

References(39)

References

Bickerstaff, K., and P. Simmons P. 2009. Absencing/presencing risk: Rethinking proximity and the experience of living with major technological hazards. Geoforum 40(5): 864–872.

Connerton, P. 2008. Seven types of forgetting. Memory Studies 1(1): 59–71.

Connerton, P. 2010. How societies remember. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Conway, B. 2003. Active remembering, selective forgetting, and collective identity: The case of Bloody Sunday. Identity: An International Journal of Theory and Research 3(4): 305–323.

Convery, I., G. Corsane, and P. Davis. 2014. Displaced heritage. Responses to disaster, trauma and loss. Newcastle: Boydell & Brewer.

Erll, A., and A. Nunning. 2008. Cultural memory studies: An international and interdisciplinary handbook. Berlin: De Gruyter.

Giddens, A. 1990. The consequences of modernity. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Halbwachs, M. 1950. Space and the collective memory (La mémoire collective et l’espace). In The collective memory (La mémoire collective), ed. J. Halbwachs Alexandre, 83–105. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France (in French).

Halbwachs, M, and L.A. Coser. 1992. On collective memory. Edited, translated, and introduction by L.A. Coser. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Hamer, J.H. 1994. Identity, process, and reinterpretation. The past made present and the present made past. Anthropos 89(1–3): 181–190.

Hardt, O., K. Nader, and L. Nadel. 2013. Decay happens: The role of active forgetting in memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 17(3): 111–120.

Hoelscher, S., and D. Alderman. 2004. Memory and place: Geographies of a critical relationship. Social & Cultural Geography 5(3): 347–355.

Isakson, B.L., and G. Jurkovic. 2013. Healing after torture: The role of moving on. Qualitative Health Research 23: 749–761.

Jackson. M. 2002. The politics of storytelling. Variations on a theme by Hannah Arendt. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press.

Johnson, N.C. 2012. The contours of memory in post-conflict societies: Enacting public remembrance of the bomb in Omagh, Northern Ireland. Cultural Geographies 19(2): 237–258.

Kelman, I. 2020. Disaster by choice: How our actions turn natural hazards into catastrophes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Kevers, R., P. Rober, I. Derluyn, and L. de Haene. 2016. Remembering collective violence: Broadening the notion of traumatic memory in post-conflict rehabilitation. Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry 40(4): 620–640.

Le Blanc, A. 2012. Remembering disasters: The resilience approach. Journal of Art Theory and Practice 14: 217–245.

Legg, S. 2007. Reviewing geographies of memory/forgetting. Environment and Planning A 39(2): 456–466.

López-Carresi, A. 2013. Disaster management: International lessons in risk reduction, response and recovery. New York: Routledge.

McEwen, L., J. Garde-Hansen, A. Holmes, O. Jones, and F. Krause. 2017. Sustainable flood memories, lay knowledges and the development of community resilience to future flood Risk. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 42(1): 14–28.

Mika, K., and I. Kelman. 2019. Shealing: Post‐disaster slow healing and later recovery. Area. https://doi.org/10.1111/area.12605.

Mileti, D.S. 1999. Disasters by design: A reassessment of natural hazards in the United States. Washington: Joseph Henry Press.

Monteil, C., P. Simmons, and A. Hicks. 2020. Post-disaster recovery and sociocultural change: Rethinking social capital development for the new social fabric. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 42: Article 101356.

Montserrat Volcano Observatory and Disaster Management Coordination Agency. 2014. Montserrat hazard level system zones—version 3 2–3. Flemmings, Montserrat: MVO and DMCA. https://mvoms.org/pub/Hazard_Level_System/HLS-20140801.pdf. Accessed 7 May 2020.

Muzaini, H. 2015. On the matter of forgetting and ‘memory returns.’ Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 40(1): 102–112.

Oliver-Smith, A., I. Alcántara-Ayala, I. Burton, and A. Lavell. 2016. Forensic Investigations of Disasters (FORIN): A conceptual framework and guide to research. Beijing: IRDR.

Olshansky, R.B., L.D. Hopkins, and L.A. Johnson. 2012. Disaster and recovery: Processes compressed in time. Natural Hazards Review 13(3): 173–178.

Parkhill, K., N.F. Pidgeon, K. Henwood, P. Simmons, and D. Venables. 2010. From the familiar to the extraordinary: Local residents’ perceptions of risk when living with nuclear power in the UK. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 35(1): 39–58.

Pfefferbaum, B.J., D. Reissman, R.L. Pfefferbaum, R.W. Klomp, and R.H. Gurwitch. 2007. Building resilience to mass trauma events. In Handbook of Injury and Violence Prevention, ed. L. Doll, E.N. Haas, S. Bonzo, D. Sleet, and J. Mercy, 347–358. Boston: Springer US.

Ravilious, K. 2018. Terrawatch: Montserrat’s volcano remains a risk. The Guardian, 6 March 2018. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/mar/06/terrawatch-montserrats-volcano-remains-a-risk#comments. Accessed 5 May 2020.

Romeo, D. 2017. 2017–2018 budget statement. Moving Montserrat forward towards self-sustainability and inclusive economic growth. Plymouth (de jure) / Brades (de facto): Government of Montserrat. https://finance.gov.ms/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/2017-18-Budget-Statement.pdf. Accessed 5 May 2020.

SAC (Scientific Advisory Committee). 2013. Assessment of the hazards and risks associated with the Soufriere Hills Volcano, Montserrat. 18th report of the Scientific Advisory Committee on Montserrat. Part Ⅱ, full report. Plymouth (de jure) / Brades (de facto): SAC.

Singer, J.A., and M.A. Conway. 2008. Should we forget forgetting? Memory Studies 1(3): 279–285.

Suleiman, S.R. 2012. Crises of memory and the Second World War. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Wachinger, G., and O. Renn. 2010. Risk perception and natural hazards. CapHaz-Net WP3 report. Stuttgart: DIALOGIK Non-Profit Institute for Communication and Cooperative Research.

Wachinger, G., O. Renn, C. Begg, and C. Kuhlicke. 2013. The risk perception paradox–Implications for governance and communication of natural hazards. Risk Analysis 33(6): 1049–1065.

Wilkinson, E. 2015. Beyond the volcanic crisis: Co-governance of risk in Montserrat. Journal of Applied Volcanology 4: Article 3.

Wisner, B., P. Blaikie, T. Cannon, and I. Davis. 2004. At risk: Natural hazards, people’s vulnerability and disasters, 2nd edn. London: Routledge.

Relative Articles

Supplements(0)

Cited By

Proportional views