An Empirical Exploration of the Capabilities of People with Disabilities in Coping with Disasters

Khanh That Ton; JC Gaillard; Carole Adamson; Caglar Akgungor; Ha Thanh Ho

doi:10.1007/s13753-020-00287-6

Volume 11 Issue 5

Dec. 2020

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > International Journal of Disaster Risk Science > 2020 > 11(5): 602-614

Khanh That Ton, JC Gaillard, Carole Adamson, Caglar Akgungor, Ha Thanh Ho. An Empirical Exploration of the Capabilities of People with Disabilities in Coping with Disasters[J]. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2020, 11(5): 602-614. doi: 10.1007/s13753-020-00287-6

Citation:

Khanh That Ton, JC Gaillard, Carole Adamson, Caglar Akgungor, Ha Thanh Ho. An Empirical Exploration of the Capabilities of People with Disabilities in Coping with Disasters[J]. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2020, 11(5): 602-614. doi: 10.1007/s13753-020-00287-6

Citation:

Khanh That Ton, JC Gaillard, Carole Adamson, Caglar Akgungor, Ha Thanh Ho. An Empirical Exploration of the Capabilities of People with Disabilities in Coping with Disasters[J]. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2020, 11(5): 602-614. doi: 10.1007/s13753-020-00287-6

PDF

An Empirical Exploration of the Capabilities of People with Disabilities in Coping with Disasters

doi: 10.1007/s13753-020-00287-6

1 School of Environment, The University of Auckland, Auckland 1010, New Zealand;
2 Unit for Environmental Sciences and Management, NorthWest University, Potchefstroom, South Africa;
3 School of Counselling, Human Services and Social Work, The University of Auckland, Auckland 1010, New Zealand;
4 Resilience Advisors Network, Dublin 4 D04 ED73, Ireland;
5 Centre for Climate Change Study in Central Vietnam, Hue University of Agriculture and Forestry, Hue City, Vietnam

Available Online: 2021-04-26
Publish Date: 2020-12-01

Abstract

Abstract

While the capability approach is increasingly being adopted for evaluating well-being and social justice in the field of human development, this approach in disaster research has remained scarce. This research thus seeks to address the disaster risk that humans face through a lens of capabilities, with a focus on the lives of people with disabilities. A multi-case study approach was adopted and two rural communes in Vietnam were selected as study contexts. Data were collected using focus group discussions and interviews that involved people with disabilities, parents/caregivers of people with intellectual/psychosocial disabilities, and representatives from related organizations. It was found that people with disabilities are affected by disasters due to the lack of capabilities that they value in coping with disasters. A range of capabilities that people with disabilities value was revealed in the study sites, with many being valued not only in times of disasters but also in daily life. The findings also highlight that, to actualize their valued capabilities, people with disabilities need access not only to resources but also to the factors that enable them to convert the resources to their valued capabilities. In most cases, the limitations to the achievement of capabilities are related to the external environment.
- Capability approach,
- Disasters,
- People with disabilities,
- Vietnam,
- Vulnerability

FullText(HTML)

References(41)

References

Alexander, D., J.C. Gaillard, and B. Wisner. 2012. Disability and disaster. In The Routledge handbook of hazards and disaster risk reduction, ed. B. Wisner, J. Gaillard, and I. Kelman, 413–423. New York: Routledge.

Binh, T.T., V.H. Phong, and V.P. Thao. 2017. Ending stigma—Assessment from the perspectives of people with disabilities. Hanoi: Knowledge Publishing House.

Bolte, P., S. Marr, and D. Sitompul. 2014. Empowerment and participation: Good practices from South & South-East Asia in disability inclusive disaster risk management. https://www.preventionweb.net/files/38358_38358hiempowermentandparticipationi.pdf. Accessed 5 Apr 2017.

Burchardt, T. 2004. Capabilities and disability: The capabilities framework and the social model of disability. Disability & Society 19(7): 735–751.

Cam Thuy People’s Committee. 2018. Report on results of community-based disaster risk assessment in Cam Thuy Commune, Cam Lo District, Quang Tri Province. Unpublished report. Quang Tri: Cam Thuy People’s Committee.

Conceição, P. 2019. Human development report 2019. Beyond income, beyond averages, beyond today: Inequalities in human development in the 21st century. New York: United Nations Development Programme.

Corrigan, P.W. 2014. The stigma of disease and disability: Understanding causes and overcoming injustices. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Danermark, B., M. Ekström, L. Jakobsen, and J.C. Karlsson. 2002. Explaining society: Critical realism in the social sciences. London: Routledge.

Davis, E.A., R. Hansen, M. Kett, J. Mincin, and J. Twigg. 2013. Disability. In Social vulnerability to disasters, 2nd edn, ed. D.S.K. Thomas, B.D. Phillips, W.E. Lovekamp, and A. Fothergill, 199–234. New York: CRC Press.

Drabek, T.E. 2018. The human side of disaster, 2nd edn. Boca Raton: CRC Press.

Dubois, J.L., and J.F. Trani. 2009. Extending the capability paradigm to address the complexity of disability. Alter 3(3): 192–218.

Duong, L.B., N.D. Vinh, and K.T. Hong. 2008. People with disabilities in Vietnam: Findings from a social survey at Thai Binh, Quang Nam, Da Nang and Dong Nai. Hanoi: National Political Publishing House.

Fjord, L., and L. Manderson. 2009. Anthropological perspectives on disasters and disability: An introduction. Human Organization 68(1): 64–72.

Fleetwood, S. 2014. Bhaskar and critical realism. In The Oxford handbook of sociology, social theory, and organization studies, ed. P. Adler, P. du Gay, G. Morgan, M. Reed, and S. Fleetwood, 1–17. New York: Oxford University Press.

Fletcher, A.J. 2017. Applying critical realism in qualitative research: Methodology meets method. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 20(2): 181–194.

Foster, J.E., and C. Handy. 2008. External capabilities. In Arguments for a better world: Essays in honor of Amartya Sen, ed. K. Basu, and R. Kanbur, 362–374. New York: Oxford University Press.

Hunt, P.C. 2005. An introduction to Vietnamese culture for rehabilitation service providers in the United States. In Culture and disability: Providing culturally competent services, ed. J.H. Stone, 203–223. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Khanh, T., and T. Thuy. 2007. Handbook for applications of folk customs (Cẩm nang ứng dụng phong tục dân gian). Hanoi: Haiphong Publishing House (in Vietnamese).

Kremakova, M.I. 2013. Too soft for economics, too rigid for sociology, or just right? The productive ambiguities of Sen’s capability approach. European Journal of Sociology 54(3): 393–419.

Lewis, J. 1999. Development in disaster-prone places: Studies of vulnerability. Warwickshire, UK: Practical Action Publishing.

Malik, K. 2014. Human development report 2014: Sustaining human progress: Reducing vulnerabilities and building resilience. New York: United Nations Development Programme.

Meekosha, H. 2006. What the hell are you? An intercategorical analysis of race, ethnicity, gender and disability in the Australian body politic. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research 8(2–3): 161–176.

Mitra, S. 2006. The capability approach and disability. Journal of Disability Policy Studies 16(4): 236–247.

Mitra, S. 2018. Disability, health and human development. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Mitra, S., M. Palmer, H. Kim, D. Mont, and N. Groce. 2017. Extra costs of living with a disability: A review and agenda for research. Disability and Health Journal 10(4): 475–484.

Nguyen, T.X.T. 2011. Policy, power, and the paradigm shift in the Vietnamese discourses of disability and inclusion. Ph.D. thesis. McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

Phu Luong People’s Committee. 2015. Report on results of disability survey in Phu Luong Commune. Unpublished report. Phu Luong: Phu Luong People’s Committee.

Priestley, M., and L. Hemingway. 2007. Disability and disaster recovery. Journal of Social Work in Disability & Rehabilitation 5(3–4): 23–42.

Robeyns, I. 2017. Wellbeing, freedom and social justice: The capability approach re-examined. Cambridge, UK: Open Book Publishers.

Robinson, A. 2017. Disability inclusion and disaster risk: Principles and guidance for implementing the Sendai framework. https://resourcecentre.savethechildren.net/node/13261/pdf/nett_uu_internasjonal-rapport_2017.pdf. Accessed 2 Apr 2019.

Sen, A. 1992. Inequality reexamined. New York: Oxford University Press.

Sen, A. 1999. Development as freedom. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

Sen, A. 2009. The idea of justice. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

Sen, A. 2010. Human disasters. In Oxford textbook of medicine, ed. D.A. Warrell, T.M. Cox, and J.D. Firth, 119–124. New York: Oxford University Press.

Smith, F., E. Jolley, and E. Schmidt. 2012. Disability and disasters: The importance of an inclusive approach to vulnerability and social capital. Chippenham, UK: Sightsavers.

Smith, F., M. Simard, J. Twigg, M. Kett, and E. Cole. 2017. Disability and climate resilience. A literature review. London: Department for International Development (DFID).

Stough, L.M., and I. Kelman. 2015. Exploring and exchanging (dis)ability and (dis)aster. In Disability and disaster, ed. I. Kelman, and L.M. Stough, 175–185. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.

Stough, L.M., and I. Kelman. 2018. People with disabilities and disasters. In Handbook of disaster research, ed. H. Rodríguez, W. Donner, and J.E. Trainor, 225–242. New York: Springer.

Stough, L.M., A.N. Sharp, J.A. Resch, C. Decker, and N. Wilker. 2016. Barriers to the long-term recovery of individuals with disabilities following a disaster. Disasters 40(3): 387–410.

Thanh, N.K. 2015. A disaster-free life—A lot of luck and happiness. In Disability and disaster, ed. I. Kelman, and L.M. Stough, 129–136. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Tierney, K. 2014. The social roots of risk: Producing disasters, promoting resilience. Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press.

Relative Articles

Supplements(0)

Cited By

Proportional views