Integrated Disaster Risk Management (IDRM): Elements to Advance Its Study and Assessment

Vicente Sandoval; Martin Voss; Verena Fl&#246;rchinger; Stephan Lorenz; Parisa Jafari

doi:10.1007/s13753-023-00490-1

Volume 14 Issue 3

Jul. 2023

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > International Journal of Disaster Risk Science > 2023 > 14(3): 343-356

Vicente Sandoval, Martin Voss, Verena Flörchinger, Stephan Lorenz, Parisa Jafari. Integrated Disaster Risk Management (IDRM): Elements to Advance Its Study and Assessment[J]. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2023, 14(3): 343-356. doi: 10.1007/s13753-023-00490-1

Citation:

Vicente Sandoval, Martin Voss, Verena Flörchinger, Stephan Lorenz, Parisa Jafari. Integrated Disaster Risk Management (IDRM): Elements to Advance Its Study and Assessment[J]. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2023, 14(3): 343-356. doi: 10.1007/s13753-023-00490-1

Citation:

Vicente Sandoval, Martin Voss, Verena Flörchinger, Stephan Lorenz, Parisa Jafari. Integrated Disaster Risk Management (IDRM): Elements to Advance Its Study and Assessment[J]. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2023, 14(3): 343-356. doi: 10.1007/s13753-023-00490-1

PDF

Integrated Disaster Risk Management (IDRM): Elements to Advance Its Study and Assessment

doi: 10.1007/s13753-023-00490-1

Disaster Research Unit, Freie Universität Berlin, 12165, Berlin, Germany

Accepted Date: 2023-04-30

Available Online: 2023-07-03

Publish Date: 2023-05-23

Abstract

Abstract

This study analyzed the international key literature on integrated disaster risk management (IDRM), considering it a dynamic sociocultural process subjected to the historical process of social formation, offering a closer look at the concept while exploring conceptual elements and ideas to advance IDRM in both national and international contexts. Methodologically, the study adopted a literature review strategy, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) approach, combined with qualitative content analysis. This article examines the history of IDRM, discusses current challenges for implementation, looks at some experiences, and proposes avenues for further research. Some findings point out the lack of an overarching IDRM approach, which is characterized by a rather disperse set of ideas and experiences concerning what IDRM is and how it should be operationalized, thereby revealing the need for a more comprehensive theory and methodologies to further advance it. Other findings highlight that IDRM encompasses different kinds and levels of “integrations” that go from internal (that is, disaster risk reduction and management domains) to external (that is, all societal processes such as sustainable development), including temporal and spatial integrations. Hence, we are talking about a multidimensional integration of disaster risk management. In this regard, the article proposes four dimensions for integration: sectoral, spatial/hierarchical, temporal, and externally with other cross-cutting societal challenges, especially climate change and sustainable development. These dimensions cover 29 ideas for indicators or “proto-indicators” to guide the discussion, exploration, and analysis of IDRM in specific contexts.
- Integrated disaster risk management,
- Literature review,
- Proto-indicators,
- Sustainable development

FullText(HTML)

References(52)

References

Alcántara-Ayala, I. 2021. Integrated landslide disaster risk management (ILDRiM): The challenge to avoid the construction of new disaster risk. Environmental Hazards 20(3): 323–344.

Alcántara-Ayala, I., M.G. Salinas, A.L. García, V.M. Rueda, O.O. Orozco, S.P. Aguilar, D.R. Velázquez, and S. Lucatello et al. 2019. Integrated disaster risk management in Mexico: Reflections, challenges, and proposals from the academic community seeking a transformation on policy making. Investigaciones Geográficas. https://doi.org/10.14350/rig.59784.

Asadzadeh, A., T. Kötter, A. Fekete, M. Moghadas, M. Alizadeh, E. Zebardast, D. Weiss, M. Basirat, and G. Hutter. 2022. Urbanization, migration, and the challenges of resilience thinking in urban planning: Insights from two contrasting planning systems in Germany and Iran. Cities 125: Article 103642.

Bajek, R., Y. Matsuda, and N. Okada. 2008. Japan’s Jishu-Bosai-Soshiki community activities: Analysis of its role in participatory community disaster risk management. Natural Hazards 44(2): 281–292.

Blümel, I., F. Brüggen, and M. Voss. 2021. Towards integrated pandemic and disaster management: Approaches in Armenia and Germany. Berlin: Academy of the Disaster Research Unit (ADRU). https://coronasys.a-kfs.de/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Towards-Integrated-Pandemic-and-Disaster-Management_AKFS_2021_8.pdf. Accessed 23 Apr 2023.

Botzen, W.J.W., L.M. Bouwer, P. Scussolini, O. Kuik, M. Haasnoot, J. Lawrence, and J.C.J.H. Aerts. 2019. Integrated disaster risk management and adaptation. In Loss and damage from climate change: Concepts, methods and policy options, ed. R. Mechler, L.M. Bouwer, T. Schinko, S. Surminski, and J. Linnerooth-Bayer, 287–315. Climate Risk Management, Policy and Governance book series. Cham: Springer.

Bueb, B., J. Tröltzsch, D. Reichwein, C. Oldenburg, and F. Favero. 2021. Towards sustainable adaptation pathways. Berlin: German Environment Agency. https://www.umweltbundesamt.de/publikationen/towards-sustainable-adaptation-pathways. Accessed 23 Apr 2023.

Chmutina, K., J. von Meding, V. Sandoval, M. Boyland, G. Forino, W. Cheek, D.A. Williams, and C. González-Muzzio et al. 2021. What we measure matters: The case of the missing development data in Sendai framework for disaster risk reduction monitoring. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science 12(6): 779–789.

Corbin, J., and A. Strauss. 2014. Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory, 4th edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Czúcz, B., H. Keith, J. Maes, A. Driver, B. Jackson, E. Nicholson, M. Kiss, and C. Obst. 2021. Selection criteria for ecosystem condition indicators. Ecological Indicators 133: Article108376.

Erikson, K.T. 1976. Everything in its path. New York: Simon & Schuster.

GFDRR (Global Facility for Disaster Reduction and Recovery), The World Bank, and UNISDR (United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction). 2009. Integrating disaster risk reduction into the fight against poverty: GFDRR Annual Report 2009. Washington, DC: GFDRR. https://www.undrr.org/publication/integrating-disaster-risk-reduction-fight-against-poverty-gfdrr-annual-report-2009. Accessed 23 Apr 2023.

Gobierno de México. 2014. General law of civil protection – Reform DOF 03-06-2014 (Ley General de Protección Civil – Reforma DOF 03-06-2014). Ciudad de México: Congreso General de los Estados Unidos Mexicanos. https://www.diputados.gob.mx/LeyesBiblio/ref/lgpc/LGPC_ref02_03jun14.pdf. Accessed 30 Apr 2023.

Gopalakrishnan, C., and N. Okada. 2007. Designing new institutions for implementing integrated disaster risk management: Key elements and future directions. Disasters 31(4): 353–372.

Gunderson, L., and C.S. Holling. 2002. Panarchy: Understanding transformations in human and natural systems. Washington, DC: Island Press.

Holling, C.S. 1973. Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 4(1): 1–23.

Ikeda, S., T. Fukuzono, and T. Sato. 2006. A better integrated management of disaster risks: Toward resilient society to emerging disaster risks in mega-cities. Tokyo: TerraPub.

Ikeda, S., T. Sato, and T. Fukuzono. 2008. Towards an integrated management framework for emerging disaster risks in Japan. Natural Hazards 44(2): 267–280.

IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). 2022. Climate change 2022: Impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, ed. H.-O. Pörtner, D.C. Roberts, M. Tignor, E.S. Poloczanska, K. Mintenbeck, A. Alegría, M. Craig, S. Langsdorf, et al. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Kelman, I. 2020. Disaster by choice: How our actions turn natural hazards into catastrophes. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Lemiale, V., M. Prakash, and A.M. Cruz. 2020. Data-driven approaches to integrated disaster risk management: Special Issue of the 9th Conference of the International Society for Integrated Disaster Risk Management. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science 11(6): 693–695.

Mansilla, E. 2019. Natural hazards governance in Mexico. The Oxford encyclopedia of natural hazards science. London: Oxford University Press.

Maurizi, V., A.S. de la Torre, L.M.E. Solís, A.L.Q. Barahona, G.V. Sánchez, F. de Jesús ColoradoGonzález, and X.M. García. 2020. Mainstreaming DRM into subnational development policies in Mexico. Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal 29(5): 811–827.

Mercado, J.M.R., A. Kawamura, and H. Amaguchi. 2020. Interrelationships of the barriers to integrated flood risk management adaptation in Metro Manila, Philippines. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 49: Article 101683.

Merkes, S.T., J. Schäfer, and M. Voss. 2020. German-Armenian research cooperation: Towards a systemic integrated pandemic and disaster risk management (Deutsch-Armenische Forschungszusammenarbeit: Wege Hin Zu Einem Systemisch-Integrierten Pandemie- Und Katastrophenrisikomanagement). ADK: Vierteljahresschrift Der Deutsch-Armenischen Gesellschaft 189(4): Article 51.

Murray, V., J. Abrahams, C. Abdallah, K. Ahmed, L. Angeles, D. Benouar, B. Torres, and C. Chan Hun et al. 2021. Hazard information profiles: Supplement to UNDRR-ISC hazard definition & classification review. Geneva: UNDDR & International Science Council.

Okada, N., L. Fang, and D. Marc Kilgour. 2013. Community-based decision making in Japan. Group Decision and Negotiation 22(1): 45–52.

Oliver-Smith, A., I. Alcántara-Ayala, I. Burton, and A. Lavell. 2016. Forensic investigations of disasters (FORIN): A conceptual framework and guide to research. FORIN Publication No.2. Beijing: Integrated Research on Disaster Risk (IRDR).

Page, M.J., J.E. McKenzie, P.M. Bossuyt, I. Boutron, T.C. Hoffmann, C.D. Mulrow, L. Shamseer, J.M. Tetzlaff, et al. 2021. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 372: Article n71.

Puente Aguilar, S. 2012. XVI From the concept of integrated risk management to public policy in civil protection, the challenges of implementation (XVI Del concepto de gestión integral de riesgos a la política pública en protección civil, los desafíos de su implementación). In Integrated disaster risk management in Mexico: Challenges and opportunities towards 2013 (La gestión integral de los riesgos de desastres en México: Retos y oportunidades hacia el 2013). Ciudad de México: Secretaría de Gobernación.

Ranke, U. 2016. Integrated disaster risk management. In Natural disaster risk management: Geosciences and social responsibility, ed. U. Ranke, 333–408. Cham: Springer.

Rosendo, S., L. Celliers, and M. Mechisso. 2018. Doing more with the same: A reality-check on the ability of local government to implement integrated coastal management for climate change adaptation. Marine Policy 87: 29–39.

Sarmiento, J.P., and D. Herard. 2015. Sistematización in urban disaster risk reduction. Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal 24: 221–229.

Shi, P. 2012. On the role of government in integrated disaster risk governance—Based on practices in China. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science 3(3): 139–146.

Sillmann, J., I. Christensen, S. Hochrainer-Stigler, J.-T. Huang-Lachmann, S. Juhola, K. Kornhuber, M.D. Mahecha, and R. Mechler et al. 2022. Briefing note: Systemic risk. Paris: International Science Council.

UNCED (United Nations Conference on Environment and Development). 1992. Agenda 21, the Rio declaration on environment and development. New York: United Nations. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/Agenda21.pdf. Accessed 23 Apr 2023.

UNDRR (United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction). 2015. Sendai framework for disaster risk reduction 2015–2030. Geneva: UNISDR.

UNDRR (United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction). 2019. 2019 Global assessment report on disaster risk reduction. Geneva: United Nations.

UNDRR (United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction). 2020. Integrating disaster risk reduction and climate change adaptation in the UN sustainable development cooperation framework: Guidance note on using climate and disaster risk management to help build resilient societies. Geneva: UNDRR. https://www.undrr.org/media/47679/download. Accessed 23 Apr 2023.

UNDRR (United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction). 2022a. 2022a Global assessment report on disaster risk reduction. Our world at risk: Transforming governance for a resilient future. Geneva: United Nations. https://www.undrr.org/GAR2022a. Accessed 23 Apr 2023.

UNDRR (United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction). 2022b. Co-Chairs’ summary: Bali agenda for resilience. Bali: UNDRR. https://www.undrr.org/publication/co-chairs-summary-bali-agenda-resilience. Accessed 23 Apr 2023.

UNDRR (United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction). 2022c. Disaster risk management. UNDRR terminology. https://www.undrr.org/terminology/disaster-risk-management. Accessed 23 Apr 2023.

UN-IDNDR (United Nations International Decade for Natural Disaster Reduction). 1994. Yokohama strategy and plan of action for a safer world. Guidelines for natural disaster prevention, preparedness and mitigation. In Proceedings of the World Conference on Natural Disaster Reduction, 23–27 May 1994, Yokohama, Japan.

UNISDR (United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction). 2005. Hyogo framework for action 2005–2015: Building the resilience of nations and communities to disasters. Hyogo, Japan: UNISDR.

United Nations. 2002. Plan of implementation of the World Summit on Sustainable Development. Johannesburg: United Nations.

Voss, M., and C. Dittmer. 2016. Resilience from a disaster sociological perspective (Resilienz aus katastrophensoziologischer perspektive). In Multidisciplinary perspectives on resilience research (Multidisziplinäre Perspektiven der Resilienzforschung), ed. R. Wink, 179–197. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien.

Voss, M., L. Bledau, S.T. Merkes, and H. Upadhyay. 2019. Disaster cultures in Germany and India under climate change. Final report on the BMBF collaborative research project vulnerability of transportation infrastructures, and warning and evacuation in the event of large-scale inland flood events (FloodEvac) (Katastrophenkulturen in Deutschland und Indien im Klimawandel. Abschlussbericht zum BMBF-Verbundforschungsforschungsprojekt Verletzlichkeit von Transportinfrastrukturen, sowie Warnung und Evakuierung im Falle von großräumigen Hochwasserereignissen im Inland (FloodEvac)). Berlin: Disaster Research Unit (DRU), FU-Berlin.

Wang, H., J. Zhou, Y. Tang, Z. Liu, A. Kang, and B. Chen. 2021. Flood economic assessment of structural measure based on integrated flood risk management: A case study in Beijing. Journal of Environmental Management 280: Article 111701.

Wisner, B. 2011. Are we there yet? Reflections on integrated disaster risk management after ten years. Journal of Integrated Disaster Risk Management 1(1): 1–14.

Wisner, B., P. Blaikie, T. Cannon, and I. Davis. 2004. At risk : Natural hazards, people’s vulnerability, and disasters, 2nd edn. London: Routledge.

World Bank. 2020. Learning from experience: Insights from China’s progress in disaster risk management. Washington, DC: World Bank.

Zhang, J., N. Okada, and H. Tatano. 2004. Integrated natural disaster risk management: Comprehensive and integrated model and Chinese strategy choice. In Proceedings of the Fifth Annual IIASA-DPRI Forum on Integrated Disaster Risk Management, 14–18 September 2005, Beijing, China.

Relative Articles

Supplements(0)

Cited By

Proportional views