Understanding Risk Governance: Introducing Sociological Neoinstitutionalism and Foucauldian Governmentality for Further Theorizing

Wee-Kiat Lim

doi:10.1007/s13753-011-0012-9

Article Contents

Article Navigation > International Journal of Disaster Risk Science > 2011 > 2(3): 11-20

Wee-Kiat Lim. Understanding Risk Governance: Introducing Sociological Neoinstitutionalism and Foucauldian Governmentality for Further Theorizing[J]. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2011, 2(3): 11-20. doi: 10.1007/s13753-011-0012-9

Citation:

Wee-Kiat Lim. Understanding Risk Governance: Introducing Sociological Neoinstitutionalism and Foucauldian Governmentality for Further Theorizing[J]. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2011, 2(3): 11-20. doi: 10.1007/s13753-011-0012-9

Citation:

PDF

Understanding Risk Governance: Introducing Sociological Neoinstitutionalism and Foucauldian Governmentality for Further Theorizing

doi: 10.1007/s13753-011-0012-9

Wee-Kiat Lim^,

Department of Sociology, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80309, USA Natural Hazards Center, Institute of Behavioral Science, Boulder, Colorado 80309, USA

Available Online: 2021-04-26

Abstract

Abstract

This article traces the career of risk across prominent theoretical approaches by highlighting their key assumptions and premises, specifically the technical approach found in the physical sciences, and economics, psychology, and sociology in the social sciences. In each discipline, the strengths and limitations of each theoretical approach are pointed out. The discussion focuses on sociology in particular because other approaches-in treating risks as dominantly technical, psychological, or economic phenomena-tend to downplay the broader historical and socio-political context that impinges on risk construction and production, and its differential impact across society. This exploration points out that institutions play an important role in creating, managing, and distributing risks in society. After highlighting the integrated risk governance framework as a nascent practice-oriented framework, the framework is examined theoretically using sociological neoinstitutionalism and Foucault's concept of governmentality. The conclusion elaborates the challenges of using these two bodies of knowledge to study risk governance of extreme events. Although Foucault's concept of governmentality corrects neoinstitutional theory's ambivalence toward power, more work needs to be done in order to reconcile their divergent intellectual commitments.
- governmentality,
- risk,
- risk governance,
- sociological neoinstitutionalism

FullText(HTML)

References(107)

References

Archibald, M. E. 2004. Between Isomorphism and Market Partitioning:How Organizational Competencies and Resources Foster Cultural and Sociocultural Legitimacy, and Promote Organizational Survival. Research in the Sociology of Organizations:Legitimacy Processes in Organizations 22:171-211.

Baldi, B. 1995. Institutional Change versus Institutional Persistence? The Transformation of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission since Three Mile Island. University of Delaware Disaster Research Center Preliminary Paper 236.

Beck, U. 1999. World Risk Society. Cambridge:Polity Press.

Berger, P. L., and Luckmann T.[1966] 1991. The Social Construction of Reality:A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. New York:Penguin Books.

Bernstein, P. L. 1996. Against the Gods:The Remarkable Story of Risk. New York:John Wiley & Sons.

Blaikie, P., T. Cannon, and B. Wisner. 2001. At Risk:Natural Hazards, People's Vulnerability, and Disasters. New York:Routledge.

Bradbury, J. A. 1989. The Policy Implications of Differing Concepts of Risk. Science, Technology, & Human Values 14(4):380-99.

Christensen, S., and J. Molin. 1995. Origin and Transformation of Organizations:Institutional Analysis of the Danish Red Cross. In The Institutional Construction of Organizations, edited by W. R. Scott and S. Christensen, 67-90. Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage Publications.

Clarke, L. 1988. Explaining Choices among Technological Risks. Social Problems 35(1):22-35.

Clarke, L., and J. F. J. Short. 1993. Social Organization and Risk:Some Current Controversies. Annual Review of Sociology 19(1):375-99.

Cooper, D. J., M. Ezzamel, and H. Willmott. 2008. Examining "Institutionalism":A Critical Theoretic Perspective. In The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, edited by R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, and R. Suddaby, 673-701. Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage Publications.

Daft, R. L., and K. E. Weick. 1984. Toward a Model of Organizations as Interpretation Systems. Academy of Management Review 9(2):284-95.

Dean, M. 2010. Governmentality:Power and Rule in Modern Society. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.

Deephouse, D. L. 1996. Does Isomorphism Legitimate? Academy of Management Journal 39(4):1024-39.

Deephouse, D. L., and M. Suchman. 2004. Legitimacy in Organizational Institutionalism. In The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, edited by R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, and R. Suddaby, 49-77. Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.

Deuchars, R. 2010. Towards the Global Social:Sociological Reflections on Governance and Risk in the Context of the Current Financial Crisis. Cambridge Review of International Affairs 23(1):107-125.

DiMaggio, P. J. 1988. Interest and Agency in Institutional Theory. In Institutional Patterns and Organizations:Culture and Environment, edited by L. G. Zucker, 3-21. Cambridge:Ballinger Publishing Company.

——. 1994. Culture and Economy. In The Handbook of Economic Sociology, edited by N. J. Smelser and R. Swedberg, 27-57. Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press.

DiMaggio, P. J., and W. W. Powell. 1983. The Iron Cage Revisited:Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review 48(2):147-60.

——. 1991. Introduction. In The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, edited by W. W. Powell and P. J. DiMaggio, 1-38. Chicago:University of Chicago Press.

Douglas, M. 1990. Risk as a Forensic Resource. Daedalus 119(4):1-16.

Douglas, M., and A. Wildavsky. 1982. Risk and Culture. Berkeley and Los Angeles:University of California Press.

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. 2003. Final Report on Price Manipulation in Western Markets (March 2003):Summary of Findings.

Feinstein, J. 2006. Managing Reliability in Electric Power Companies. In Seeds of Disasters, Roots of Response:How Private Action Can Reduce Public Vulnerability, edited by P. E. Auerswald, L. M. Branscomb, T. M. La Porte, and E. O. Michel-Kerjan, 164-83. New York:Cambridge University Press.

Fischhoff, B. 1995. Risk Perception and Communication Unplugged:Twenty Years of Process. Risk Analysis 15(2):137-45.

Foucault, M.[1977] 1995. Discipline and Punish. Translated by A. Sheridan. 2nd ed. New York:Vintage Books.

——. 2007. 8 February 1978. In Security, Territory, Population:Lectures at the Collège de France, 1977-78, edited by M. Senellart, 115-34. New York:Palgrave Macmillan.

Freudenburg, W. R. 1992. Nothing Recedes Like Success? Risk Analysis and the Organizational Amplification of Risks. Risk 3(1):1-35.

——. 1993. Risk and Recreancy:Weber, the Division of Labor, and the Rationality of Risk Perceptions. Social Forces 71(4):909-32.

Freudenburg, W. R., R. Gramling, S. Laska, and K. T. Erikson. 2007. Katrina:Unlearned Lessons. World Watch 20(5):14-19.

Friedland, R., and R. R. Alford. 1991. Bringing Society Back in:Symbols, Practices, and Institutional Contradictions. In The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, edited by W. W. Powell and P. J. DiMaggio, 232-63. Chicago:University of Chicago Press.

Gordon, C. 1991. Governmental Rationality:An introduction. In The Foucault Effect:Studies in Governmentality, edited by G. Burchell, C. Gordon, and P. Miller. Chicago:University of Chicago Press.

Hansson, S. O. 2010. Risk:Objective or Subjective, Facts or Values. Journal of Risk Research 13(2):231-38.

Hutter, B. M. 2006. Risk, Regulation, and Management. In Risk in Social Science, edited by P. Taylor-Gooby and J. O. Zinn, 202-27. New York:Oxford University Press.

Jaeger, C. C., O. Renn, E. A. Rosa, and T. Webler. 2001. Risk, Uncertainty and Rational Action. London:Earthscan.

Jasanoff, S. 1990. American Exceptionalism and the Political Acknowledgment of Risk. Daedalus 119(4):61-81.

——. 2010. Beyond Calculation:A Democratic Response to Risk. In Disaster and the Politics of Intervention, edited by A. Lakoff, 14-40. New York:Columbia University Press.

Jepperson, R. L. 2002. The Development and Application of Sociological Neoinstitutionalism. In New Directions in Contemporary Sociological Theory, edited by J. Berger and M. Zelditch Jr., 229-66.

Lanham, MD:Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.

Jepperson, R. L., and J. W. Meyer. 1991. The Public Order and the Construction of Formal Organizations. In The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, edited by W. W. Powell and P. J. DiMaggio, 204-31. Chicago:University of Chicago Press.

Kahneman, D., and D. Lovallo. 1993. Timid Choices and Bold Forecasts:A Cognitive Perspective on Risk-Taking. Management Science 39(1):17-31.

Kasperson, R. E. 1992. The Social Amplification of Risk:Progress in Developing an Integrative Framework. In Social Theories of Risk, edited by S. Krimsky and D. Golding, 153-78. Westport, CT:Praeger Publishers.

Kasperson, R. E., R. Ortwin, P. Slovic, H. S. Brown, J. Emel, R. Goble, J. X. Kasperson, and S. Ratick. 1988. The Social Amplification of Risk:A Conceptual Framework. Risk Analysis 8(2):177-87.

Latour, B. 1987. Science in Action:How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society. Cambridge:Harvard University Press.

Latour, B., and S. Woolgar. 1979. Laboratory Life:The Social Construction of Scientific Facts. Vol. 80, Sage Library of Social Research. Beverly Hills, CA:Sage Publications.

Leblebici, H., G. R. Salancik, A. Copay, and T. King. 1991. Institutional Change and the Transformation of Interorganizational Fields:An Organizational History of the U.S. Radio Broadcasting Industry. Administrative Science Quarterly 36(3):333-63.

Lemke, T. 2002. Foucault, Governmentality, and Critique. Remaking Marxism 14(3):49-64.

Luhmann, N. 1993. Risk:A Sociological Theory. New York:Aldine de Gruyter.

Manning, P. K. 1989. Managing Risk:Managing Uncertainty in the British Nuclear Installations Inspectorate. Law and Policy 11(3):350-69.

Masuda, J. R., and T. Garvin. 2006. Place, Culture, and the Social Amplification of Risk. Risk Analysis 26(2):437-54.

Meyer, J. W. 2008. Reflections on Institutional Theories of Organizations. In The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, edited by R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, and R. Suddaby, 790-812. Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.

Meyer, J. W., and B. Rowan. 1977. Institutionalized Organizations:Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony. American Journal of Sociology 83(2):340-63.

Meyer, J. W., and W. R. Scott, eds. 1983. Organizational Environments:Ritual and Rationality. Beverly Hills, CA:Sage.

Mohr, J. W., and R. Friedland. 2008. Theorizing the Institution:Foundation, Duality, and Data. Theory and Society 37:421-26.

North, D. C. 1994. Economic Performance through Time. American Economic Review 84(3):358-68.

Nye, J. S., and J. D. Donahue, eds. 2000. Governance in a Globalizing World. Washington, DC:Brookings Institution Press.

O'Neill, K. M., J. M. Calia, C. Chess, and L. Clarke. 2007. Miscommunication during the Anthrax Attacks:How Events Reveal Organizational Failures. Human Ecology Review 14(2):119-29.

Oliver, C. 1991. Strategic Responses to Institutional Processes. Academy of Management Review 16(1):145-79.

Onishi, N., and K. Belson. 2011. Culture of Complicity Tied to Stricken Nuclear Plant. The New York Times, April 26, 2011, New York edition, A1.

Otway, H., and K. Thomas. 1982. Reflections on Risk Perception and Policy. Risk Analysis 2(2):69-82.

Perrow, C. 1984. Normal Accidents:Living with High-Risk Technologies. New York:Basic Books.

——. 1986. Complex Organizations:A Critical Essay. 3rd ed. New York:Newbery Award Records.

——. 2011. The Next Catastrophe:Reducing Our Vulnerabilities to Natural, Industrial, and Terrorist Attacks. Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press.

Pidgeon, N., R. E. Kasperson, and P. Slovic. 2003. The Social Amplification of Risk. Cambridge, U.K.:Cambridge University Press.

Pinch, T. J., and W. E. Bijker. 1984. The Social Construction of Facts and Artefacts:Or How the Sociology of Science and the Sociology of Technology Might Benefit Each Other. Social Studies of Science 14(3):399-441.

Powell, W. W., and P. J. DiMaggio, eds. 1991. The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago:University of Chicago Press.

Power, M. 2011. Foucault and Sociology. Annual Review of Sociology 37:35-56.

Quarantelli, E. L. 2005. A Social Science Research Agenda for the Disasters of the 21st Century:Theoretical, Methodological and Empirical Issues and Their Professional Implementation. In What Is a Disaster?:New Answers to Old Questions, edited by R. W. Perry and E. L. Quarantelli, 325-96. Philadelphia:Xlibris.

Renn, O. 1992. Concepts of Risks:A Classification. In Social Theories of Risk, edited by S. Krimsky and D. Golding, 53-79. Westport, CT:Praeger Publishers.

——. 1998. Three Decades of Risk Research. Journal of Risk Research 1(1):49-71.

——. 2008a. Concepts of Risk:An Interdisciplinary Review. GAIA-Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society 17(1):50-66.

——. 2008b. Risk Governance:Coping with Uncertainty in a Complex World. London:Earthscan.

Renn, O., and K. D. Walker, eds. 2008. Global Risk Governance:Concept and Practice Using the IRGC Framework. Dordrecht:Springer.

Rose, N. 1999. Governing the Soul:The Shaping of the Private Self. 2nd ed. London:Free Association Books.

Sapolsky, H. M. 1990. The Politics of Risk. Daedalus 119(4):83-96.

Schmidt, V. 2006. Institutionalism. In The State:Theories and Issues, edited by C. Hay, M. Lister, and D. Marsh, 98-117. New York:Palgrave Macmillan.

Schneiberg, M., and T. Bartley. 2001. Regulating American Industries:Markets, Politics, and the Institutional Determinants of Fire Insurance Regulation. American Journal of Sociology 107(1):101-46.

Scott, W. R. 1991. Unpacking Institutional Arrangements. In The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, edited by W. W. Powell and P. J. DiMaggio, 164-82. Chicago:University of Chicago Press.

——. 2001. Institutions and Organizations. 2nd ed. Foundations for Organizational Science Series. Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage Publications.

Selznick, P. 1996. Institutionalism:"Old" and "new". Administrative Science Quarterly 41(2):270-77.

Short Jr, J. F. 1984. The Social Fabric at Risk:Toward the Social Transformation of Risk Analysis. American Sociological Review 49(6):711-25.

Shrader-Frechette, K. S. 1985. Risk Analysis and Scientific Method:Methodological and Ethical Problems with Evaluating Societal Hazards. Dodrecht:D. Reidel.

Slovic, P. 1987. Perception of Risk. Science 236(4799):280-85.

——. 1992. Perceptions of Risk:Reflections on the Psychometric Paradigm. In Social Theories of Risk, edited by S. Krimsky and D. Golding, 117-52. Westport, CT:Praeger Publishers.

——. 1999. Trust, Emotion, Sex, Politics, and Science:Surveying the Risk Assessment Battlefield. Risk Analysis 19(4):689-701.

Slovic, P., M. Finucane, E. Peters, and D. G. MacGregor. 2004. Risk as Analysis and Risk as Feelings:Some Thoughts about Affect, Reason, Risk, and Rationality. Risk Analysis 24(2):311-22.

Slovic, P., B. Fischhoff, and S. Lichtenstein. 1982. Why Study Risk Perceptions? Risk Analysis 2(2):83-93.

Stallings, R. A. 1995. Promoting Risk:Constructing the Earthquake Threat. New York:Aldine de Gruyter.

Starr, C. 1969. Social Benefit versus Technological Risk. Science 165(3899):1232-38.

Starr, C., and C. Whipple. 1980. Risks of Risk Decisions. Science 208(4448):1114-19.

——. 1984. A Perspective on Health and Safety Risk Analysis. Management Science 30(4):452-63.

Suchman, M. 1995. Managing Legitimacy:Strategic and Institutional Approaches. Academy of Management Review 20(3):571-610.

Taylor-Gooby, P., and J. O. Zinn. 2006. Current Directions in Risk Research:New Developments in Psychology and Sociology. Risk Analysis 26(2):397-411.

Tierney, K. J. 1999. Towards a Critical Sociology of Risk. Sociological Forum 14(2):215-42.

——. 2005. Social Inequality, Hazards and Disasters. In On Risk and Disaster:Lessons from Hurricane Katrina, edited by R. J. Daniels, D. F. Kettl, and H. Kunreuther, 109-28. Philadelphia:University of Pennsylvania Press.

Tierney, K. J., and C. Bevc. 2007. Disaster as War:Militarism and the Social Construction of Disaster in New Orleans. In The Sociology of Katrina:Perspectives on A Modern Catastrophe, edited by D. L. Brunsma, D. Overfelt, and J. S. Picou, 35-50. Maryland:Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.

Tolbert, P. S., and L. G. Zucker. 1983. Institutional Sources of Change in the Formal Structure of Organizations:The Diffusion of Civil Service Reform, 1880-1935. Administrative Science Quarterly 28(1):22-39.

Turner, B. A. 1976. The Organizational and Interorganizational Development of Disasters. Administrative Science Quarterly 21(3):378-97.

——. 1979. The Social Aetiology of Disasters. Disasters 3(1):53-59.

Tversky, A., and D. Kahneman. 1981. The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice. Science 211(4481):453-58.

U.S.-Canada Power System Outage Task Force. 2004. Final Report on the August 14, 2003 Blackout in the United States and Canada:Causes and Recommendations. https://reports.energy.gov/BlackoutFinal-Web.pdf.

Vaughan, D. 1996. The Challenger Launch Decision:Risky Technology, Culture and Deviance at NASA. Chicago:University of Chicago Press.

——. 1999. The Role of Organization in the Production of Techno-Scientific Knowledge. Social Studies of Science 29(6):913-43.

——. 2004. Theorizing Disaster:Analogy, Historical Ethnography, and the Challenger Accident. Ethnography 5(3):315-47.

Weinberg, A. M. 1972. Science and Trans-Science. Minerva 10(2):209-22.

Williamson, O. E. 1994. Transaction Cost Economics and Organization Theory. In Handbook of Economic Sociology, edited by N. J. Smelser and R. Swedberg, 77-107. Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press.

Zucker, L. G., ed. 1988. Institutional Patterns and Organizations:Culture and Environment. Cambridge:Ballinger Publishing Company.

Relative Articles

Supplements(0)

Cited By

Proportional views