Why People Live in Flood-Prone Areas in Akuressa, Sri Lanka

Johan Askman; Olof Nilsson; Per Becker

doi:10.1007/s13753-018-0167-8

Article Contents

Article Navigation > International Journal of Disaster Risk Science > 2018 > 9(2): 143-156

Johan Askman, Olof Nilsson, Per Becker. Why People Live in Flood-Prone Areas in Akuressa, Sri Lanka[J]. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2018, 9(2): 143-156. doi: 10.1007/s13753-018-0167-8

Citation:

Johan Askman, Olof Nilsson, Per Becker. Why People Live in Flood-Prone Areas in Akuressa, Sri Lanka[J]. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2018, 9(2): 143-156. doi: 10.1007/s13753-018-0167-8

Citation:

PDF

Why People Live in Flood-Prone Areas in Akuressa, Sri Lanka

doi: 10.1007/s13753-018-0167-8

Division of Risk Management and Societal Safety, Lund University, 22100 Lund, Sweden

Available Online: 2021-04-26

Abstract

Abstract

To investigate why people live in areas at high risk of floods, a qualitative case study was carried out in the areas around Akuressa, in southwest Sri Lanka. Data collection consisted mainly of semistructured interviews with local residents and government officials. The purpose was to study why people live in areas at high risk of floods, by looking beyond the purely physical aspects of living with hazards and exploring the underlying social factors. Four main factors were identified: an overall good living situation; a sense of place; difficulties relocating; and being well-adapted to the situation. The analysis also examined whether government officials shared the views of local residents. The findings highlighted both areas of consensus and discrepancies related to risk awareness, and the efficiency of risk reduction measures that had been implemented by the government. The case study identified and explored underlying social factors, such as risk normalization, risk trade-offs, and push-and-pull processes, which seem to influence the decision to live in a high-risk area.
- Flood risk,
- Risk awareness,
- Risk perception,
- Sri Lanka

FullText(HTML)

References(49)

References

Adger, N.W. 2006. Vulnerability. Global Environmental Change 16: 268–281.

Becker, P. 2014. Sustainability science: Managing risk and resilience for sustainable development. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

Bernard, R.H. 2006. Research methods in anthropology: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield.

Bonaiuto, M., S. Alves, S. De Dominicis, and I. Petruccelli. 2016. Place attachment and natural hazard risk: Research review and agenda. Journal of Environmental Psychology 48: 33–53.

Burton, I., R.W. Kates, and G.F. White. 1968. The human ecology of extreme geophysical events. Natural hazard research working paper No.1. Tampa, FL: Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute.

Burton, I., R.W. Kates, and G.F. White. 1978. The environment as hazard. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.

Charmaz, K. 2006. Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: SAGE Publications.

Chawla, L. 1992. Childhood place attachments. In Place attachment, ed. I. Altman, and S.M. Low, 63–86. New York: Springer US.

Coppola, D.P. 2011. Introduction to international disaster management, 2nd edn. Burlington, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann.

Cox, R.S., and K.-M.E. Perry. 2011. Like a fish out of water: Reconsidering disaster recovery and the role of place and social capital in community disaster resilience. American Journal of Community Psychology 48(3–4): 395–411.

CRED (Center for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters). 2016. EM-DAT: The international disasters database. http://www.emdat.be. Accessed 9 Dec 2016.

Fischhoff, B., P. Slovic, and S. Lichtenstein. 1978. How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risks and benefits. Policy Sciences 9(2): 127–152.

Freed, A. 1988. Interviewing through an interpreter. Social Work 33(4): 315–319.

Hearn Morrow, B. 1999. Identifying and mapping community vulnerability. Disasters 23(1): 1–18.

Hewitt, K. 1983. The idea of calamity in a technocratic age. In Interpretations of calamity, ed. K. Hewitt, 3–32. London and Winchester: Allen & Unwin.

Höst, M., B. Regnell, and P. Runeson. 2006. To complete the degree project (Att genomföra examensarbete). Lund: Studentlitteratur (in Swedish).

Johnson, D., and S. Levin. 2009. The tragedy of cognition: Psychological biases and environmental inaction. Current Science 97(11): 1593–1603.

Kates, R.W. 1976. Experiencing the environment as hazard. New York and London: Plenum Press.

Lima, M.L. 2004. On the influence of risk perception on mental health: Living near an incinerator. Journal of Environmental Psychology 24(1): 71–84.

Longhurst, R. 2016. Semi-structured interviews and focus groups. In Key methods in geography, ed. R. Rojek, 143–156. London: SAGE Publications.

Luìs, S., L. Pinho, M. Lima, C. Roseta-Palma, F. Cardoso Martins, and A. de Almeida. 2016. Is it all about awareness? The normalization of coastal risk. Journal of Risk Research 19(6): 810–826.

McEntire, D.A. 2005. Why vulnerability matters: Exploring the merit of an inclusive disaster reduction concept. Disaster Prevention and Management 14(2): 206–222.

Ministry of Disaster Management Sri Lanka. 2012. Hazard profiles of Sri Lanka. Colombo: Nanila Publication (Pvt). http://www.dmc.gov.lk/hazard/hazard/Report.html. Accessed 3 Oct 2016.

Ministry of Policy Planning and Economic Affairs. 2012. Census of population and housing 2012. Department of Census and Statistics. Battaramulla: Ministry of Policy Planning and Economic Affairs.

Nighswonger Kraus, N., and P. Slovic. 1988. Taxonomic analysis of perceived risk: Modeling individual and group perceptions within homogeneous hazard domains. Risk Analysis 8(3): 435–455.

O’Keefe, P., K. Westgate, and B. Wisner. 1976. Taking the naturalness out of natural disasters. Nature 260: 566–567.

Oliver-Smith, A. 1991. Successes and failures in post-disaster resettlement. Disasters 15(1): 12–23.

Perry, R.W., and M.K. Lindell. 2003. Preparedness for emergency response: Guidelines for the emergency planning process. Disasters 27(4): 336–350.

Politz, A. 1960. The dilemma of creative advertising. Journal of Marketing 25(2): 1–6.

Quarantelli, E. 1997. Ten criteria for evaluating the management of community disasters. Disasters 21(1): 39–56.

Raaijmakers, R., J. Krywkow, and A. van der Veen. 2008. Flood risk perceptions and spatial multi-criteria analysis: An exploratory research for hazard mitigation. Natural Hazards 46(3): 307–322.

Renn, O. 1998. The role of risk perception for risk management. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 59(1): 49–62.

Scolobig, A., B. De Marchi, and M. Borga. 2012. The missing link between flood risk awareness and preparedness: Findings from case studies in an Alpine Region. Natural Hazards 63(2): 499–520.

Silver, A., and J. Grek-Martin. 2015. “Now we understand what community really means”: Reconceptualizing the role of sense of place in the disaster recovery process. Journal of Environmental Psychology 42: 32–41.

Sjöberg, L. 2000. Factors in risk perception. Risk Analysis 20(1): 1–11.

Slovic, P. 2001. The risk game. Journal of Hazardous Materials 86: 17–24.

Slovic, P., B. Fischhoff, and S. Lichtenstein. 1984. Behavioral decision theory perspectives on risk and safety. Acta Psychologica 56(1–3): 183–203.

Smith, K. 2013. Environmental hazards: Assessing risk and reducing disaster, 6th edn. New York: Routledge.

Sooriyabandara, L. 2016. Chief irrigation engineer at the district irrigation department. Interview by O. Nilsson, and J. Askman, 9 September 2016, Matara, Sri Lanka.

Turner Ⅱ, B.L., R.E. Kasperson, P.A. Matson, J.J. McCarthy, R.W. Corell, L. Christensen, A. Schiller. 2003. A framework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 100(14): 8074–8079.

Twigger-Ross, C.L., and D.L. Uzzell. 1996. Place and identity processes. Journal of Environmental Psychology 16: 205–220.

UNDP (United Nations Development Programme). 2004. Reducing disaster risk: A challenge for development. New York: UNDP.

Wester-Herber, M. 2004. Underlying concerns in land-use conflicts: The role of place-identity in risk perception. Environmental Science and Policy 7(2): 109–116.

White, G.F. 1945. Human adjustment to floods: A geographical approach to the flood problem in the United States. University of Chicago, Department of Geography, Research Paper No. 29.

White, G.F. 1964. Choice of adjustment to floods. University of Chicago, Department of Geography, Research Paper No. 93.

Wisner, B., P. Blaikie, T. Cannon, and I. Davis. 2003. At risk: Natural hazards, people’s vulnerability and disasters. New York: Routledge.

Yin, R.K. 2002. Case study research: Design and methods, 3rd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

Zajonc, R.B. 1968. Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 9(2): 1.

Zubair, L. 2004. May 2003 disaster in Sri Lanka and cyclone 01-B in the bay of Bengal. Natural Hazards 33(3): 303–318.

Relative Articles

Supplements(0)

Cited By

Proportional views