Landslide Loss and Damage in Sindhupalchok District, Nepal: Comparing Income Groups with Implications for Compensation and Relief

Kees van der Geest

doi:10.1007/s13753-018-0178-5

Article Contents

Article Navigation > International Journal of Disaster Risk Science > 2018 > 9(2): 157-166

Kees van der Geest. Landslide Loss and Damage in Sindhupalchok District, Nepal: Comparing Income Groups with Implications for Compensation and Relief[J]. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2018, 9(2): 157-166. doi: 10.1007/s13753-018-0178-5

Citation:

Kees van der Geest. Landslide Loss and Damage in Sindhupalchok District, Nepal: Comparing Income Groups with Implications for Compensation and Relief[J]. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2018, 9(2): 157-166. doi: 10.1007/s13753-018-0178-5

Citation:

PDF

Landslide Loss and Damage in Sindhupalchok District, Nepal: Comparing Income Groups with Implications for Compensation and Relief

doi: 10.1007/s13753-018-0178-5

Kees van der Geest^,

United Nations University Institute for Environment and Human Security, Platz der Vereinten Nationen 1, 53113 Bonn, Germany

Funds:

The authors wish to thank the Asia–Pacific Network for Global Change Research (APN) for funding the fieldwork of this study. Acknowledgements also go to the Integrated Development Society (IDS) in Nepal for organizing fieldwork logistics. The field team consisted of Sunita Bhattarai, Keshav Paudel, Anjan Kumar Phoju, Ranjita Thapa, Sangita Pokhrel, Ram Krishna Kunwar, Bal Bahadur Gurung, and Maria Kibta. At the United Nations University Institute for Environment and Human Security (UNU-EHS) Markus Schindler supported with data analysis. This article also greatly benefitted from the comments of two anonymous reviewers.

Available Online: 2021-04-26

Abstract

Abstract

The 2014 Jure landslide in Sindhupalchok District, Nepal, caused significant loss and damage to ecosystems and livelihoods in the area. In the direct aftermath of the landslide, several disaster loss assessments were conducted, with the aim of counting casualties, injured people, and damaged houses and infrastructure. Although useful and necessary in their own right, such rapid assessments do not reveal the true extent and significance of the losses and damages that people in disaster areas face, including their monetary value. We address this gap, based on a comprehensive household survey (N=234), as well as other, qualitative research tools. Our results highlight the importance of differentiating between loss and damage in absolute monetary terms as opposed to losses relative to annual income. We find a stark contrast between the high absolute losses incurred by nonpoor households, and the high relative losses—up to 14 times their annual income—experienced by poor households. These results have important implications for policy that addresses loss and damage, not only of landslides but also of other disasters. Loss and damage assessments need to take the livelihood characteristics of affected households into account to identify and support those most in need of compensation and relief.
- Compensation and relief,
- Impact assessment,
- Landslides,
- Loss and damage analysis,
- Nepal

FullText(HTML)

References(42)

References

Adger, W.N., S. Dessai, M. Goulden, M. Hulme, I. Lorenzoni, D.R. Nelson, L.O. Naess, J. Wolf, and A. Wreford. 2009. Are there social limits to adaptation to climate change? Climatic Change 93(3–4): 335–354.

Agrawala, S., and S. Fankhauser. 2008. Economic aspects of adaptation to climate change: Costs, benefits and policy instruments. Paris: OECD.

Bauer, K. 2013. Are preventive and coping measures enough to avoid loss and damage from flooding in Udayapur district, Nepal? International Journal of Global Warming 5(4): 433–451.

Birkmann, J., O.D. Cardona, M.L. Carreño, A.H. Barbat, M. Pelling, S. Schneiderbauer, S. Kienberger, M. Keiler, D. Alexander, P. Zeil, and T. Welle. 2013. Framing vulnerability, risk and societal responses: The MOVE framework. Natural Hazards 67(2): 193–211.

Blaikie, P., T. Cannon, I. Davis, and B. Wisner. 2003. At risk: Natural hazards, people’s vulnerability and disasters. London and New York: Routledge.

Blake, E.S., T.B. Kimberlain, R.J. Berg, J.P. Cangialosi, and J.L. Beven. 2013. Tropical cyclone report Hurricane Sandy (AL182012), 22–29 October 2012. http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/data/tcr/AL182012_Sandy.pdf. Accessed 17 May 2018.

Boyd, E., R. James, R. Jones, H. Young, and F. Otto. 2017. A typology of loss and damage perspectives. Nature Climate Change 7(10): 723–729.

Burkett, M. 2016. Reading between the red lines: Loss and damage and the Paris outcome. Climate Law 6(1–2): 118–129.

Chambers, R. 1989. Editorial introduction: Vulnerability, coping and policy. IDS Bulletin 20(2): 1–7.

Dahal, R., and S. Hasegawa. 2008. Representative rainfall thresholds for landslides in the Nepal Himalaya. Geomorphology 100(3–4): 429–443.

Dow, K., F. Berkhout, B.L. Preston, R.J.T. Klein, G. Midgley, and M.R. Shaw. 2013. Limits to adaptation. Nature Climate Change 3(4): 305–307.

van der Geest, K., and M. Schindler. 2016. Case study report: Loss and damage from a catastrophic landslide in Sindhupalchok District, Nepal. Bonn: Institute for Environment and Human Security, United Nations University.

van der Geest, K., and M. Schindler. 2017. Handbook for assessing loss and damage in vulnerable communities. Bonn: United Nations University Institute for Environment and Human Security.

van der Geest, K., and K. Warner. 2015. Vulnerability, coping and loss and damage from climate events. In Hazards, risks and disasters in society, ed. A. Collins, 121–144. New York: Elsevier.

Government of Nepal. 2014. Report on Jure Landslide, Mankha VDC, Sindhupalchowk District. Kathmandu: Ministry of Irrigation.

Government of Nepal. 2017. Observed climate trend analysis of Nepal (1971–2014). Kathmandu: Department of Hydrology and Meteorology, Ministry of Population and Environment.

Greeley, M. 1994. Measurement of poverty and poverty of measurement. IDS Bulletin 25(2): 50–58.

Huggel, C., J. Clague, and O. Korup. 2012. Is climate change responsible for changing landslide activity in high mountains? Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 37(1): 77–91.

Huggel, C., I. Wallimann-Helmer, D. Stone, and W. Cramer. 2016. Reconciling justice and attribution research to advance climate policy. Nature Climate Change 6(10): 901–908.

IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). 2012. Managing the risks of extreme events and disasters to advance climate change adaptation. A special report of Working Groups I and Ⅱ of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

James, R., F. Otto, H. Parker, E. Boyd, R. Cornforth, D. Mitchell, and M. Allen. 2014. Characterizing loss and damage from climate change. Nature Climate Change 4(11): 938–939.

Khanal, N.R., and D.R. Gurung. 2014. Results of a rapid investigation of the Jure landslide site on 5 August 2014. http://www.icimod.org/?q=14479. Accessed 17 May 2018.

Kryvasheyeu, Y., H. Chen, N. Obradovich, E. Moro, P. Van Hentenryck, J. Fowler, and M. Cebrian. 2016. Rapid assessment of disaster damage using social media activity. Science Advances 2(3): e1500779.

Kunz, M., B. Mühr, T. Kunz-Plapp, J.E. Daniell, B. Khazai, F. Wenzel, M. Vannieuwenhuyse, T. Comes, F. Elmer, K. Schröter, J. Fohringer, T. Münzberg, C. Lucas, and J. Zschau. 2013. Investigation of superstorm Sandy 2012 in a multi-disciplinary approach. Natural Hazards and Earth System Science 13(10): 2579–2598.

Kusters, K., and N. Wangdi. 2013. The costs of adaptation: Changes in water availability and farmers’ responses in Punakha district, Bhutan. International Journal of Global Warming 5(4): 387–399.

Lawson, F. 2017. Climate litigation moves to the private sphere: The case of Lliuya v RWE AG. http://www.6pumpcourt.co.uk/2017/12/climate-litigation-moves-to-the-private-sphere-the-case-of-lliuya-v-rwe-ag/. Accessed 17 May 2018.

Merz, B., H. Kreibich, R. Schwarze, and A. Thieken. 2010. Assessment of economic flood damage. Natural Hazards and Earth System Science 10(8): 1697–1724.

Mirza, M. 2010. Climate change, flooding in South Asia and implications. Regional Environmental Change 11(S1): S95–S107.

Nadiruzzaman, M., and D. Wrathall. 2015. Participatory exclusion—Cyclone Sidr and its aftermath. Geoforum 64: 196–204.

Parker, H.R., E. Boyd, R.J. Cornforth, R. James, F.E.L. Otto, and M.R. Allen. 2017. Stakeholder perceptions of event attribution in the loss and damage debate. Climate Policy 17(4): 533–550.

Paul, B.K., and S. Dutt. 2010. Hazard warnings and responses to evacuation orders: The case of Bangladesh’s cyclone Sidr. Geographical Review 100(3): 336–355.

Roberts, E., K. van der Geest, K. Warner, and S. Andrei. 2014. Loss and damage: When adaptation is not enough. Environmental Development 11: 219–227.

Roberts, E., and S. Huq. 2015. Coming full circle: The history of loss and damage under the UNFCCC. International Journal of Global Warming 8(2): 141–157.

Roberts, E., and M. Pelling. 2016. Climate change-related loss and damage: Translating the global policy agenda for national policy processes. Climate and Development 10(1): 4–17.

Sapkota, B.K. 2017. Landslide loss and damage in Darbung Village, Gorkha District, Nepal. In Climate change research at universities, ed. W.L. Filho, 153–173. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.

Serdeczny, O., E. Waters, and S. Chan. 2016. Non-economic loss and damage: Addressing the forgotten side of climate change impacts. DIE Briefing Paper 03/2016. http://climate-neld.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/BP_3.2016.pdf. Accessed 17 May 2018.

Sharma, E., N. Chettri, K. Tse-Ring, A.B. Shrestha, F. Jing, P. Mool, and M. Eriksson. 2009. Climate change impacts and vulnerability in the Eastern Himalayas. Kathmandu: ICIMOD.

Shrestha, A.B., N.R. Khanal, M. Shrestha, H.K. Nibanupudi, and D. Molden. 2014. Eye on the Sun Koshi landslide: Monitoring and infrastructure planning key to minimizing scale of disasters. http://www.icimod.org/?q=14356. Accessed 17 May 2018.

UNEP (United Nations Environment Programm). 2016. Loss and damage: The role of ecosystem services. Nairobi: UNEP.

Warner, K., and K. van der Geest. 2013. Loss and damage from climate change: Local-level evidence from nine vulnerable countries. International Journal of Global Warming 5(4): 367–386.

Warner, K., K. van der Geest, and S. Kreft. 2013. Pushed to the limit: Evidence of climate change-related loss and damage when people face constrains and limits to adaptation. Bonn: Institute for Environment and Human Security, United Nations University.

Warner, K., K. van der Geest, S. Kreft, S. Huq, S. Harmeling, K. Kusters, and A. de Sherbinin. 2012. Evidence from the frontlines of climate change: Loss and damage to communities despite coping and adaptation. Bonn: Institute for Environment and Human Security, United Nations University.

Relative Articles

Supplements(0)

Cited By

Proportional views