Multidimensional Model for Vulnerability Assessment of Urban Flooding: An Empirical Study in Pakistan

Irfan Ahmad Rana; Jayant K. Routray

doi:10.1007/s13753-018-0179-4

Article Contents

Article Navigation > International Journal of Disaster Risk Science > 2018 > 9(3): 359-375

Irfan Ahmad Rana, Jayant K. Routray. Multidimensional Model for Vulnerability Assessment of Urban Flooding: An Empirical Study in Pakistan[J]. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2018, 9(3): 359-375. doi: 10.1007/s13753-018-0179-4

Citation:

Irfan Ahmad Rana, Jayant K. Routray. Multidimensional Model for Vulnerability Assessment of Urban Flooding: An Empirical Study in Pakistan[J]. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2018, 9(3): 359-375. doi: 10.1007/s13753-018-0179-4

Citation:

PDF

Multidimensional Model for Vulnerability Assessment of Urban Flooding: An Empirical Study in Pakistan

doi: 10.1007/s13753-018-0179-4

Irfan Ahmad Rana¹,
Jayant K. Routray²

1 Department of Urban and Regional Planning(URP), School of Civil and Environmental Engineering(SCEE), National University of Sciences and Technology(NUST), H-12, Campus, Islamabad, Pakistan;
2 Regional and Rural Development Planning(RRDP) and Disaster Preparedness, Mitigation and Management(DPMM), Department of Development and Sustainability, Asian Institute of Technology, Klong Luang, Pathum Thani, Thailand

Available Online: 2021-04-26

Abstract

Abstract

Urban flooding has become a regular phenomenon in many towns and cities in the Asia Pacific region over the past years. Professionals associated with disaster management and climate change are at the forefront of addressing urban flooding. To reduce flood risks, vulnerability and its components must be understood. Vulnerability assessment methods are diverse and complex, with a varied nature of understanding the key terms used in various contexts, and this diversity ultimately reflects on the interpretation of results in research settings. Diverse interpretations and definitions exist in the disaster risk and climate change literature, complicating the process of astute and comprehensive vulnerability assessment. The main purpose of this study was to quantify vulnerability indicators and develop a multidimensional model for vulnerability assessment. Vulnerability is explored through the lens of five dimensions: social, economic, physical/infrastructural, institutional, and attitudinal. This methodology is applied to urban flooding in Pakistan, to verify the proposed model. Three study sites in urban areas with different population sizes, situated in high-risk flood zones in the Punjab Province of Pakistan were selected for empirical investigation. A household survey was conducted, and indices were developed for each dimension based on well-defined indicators. The proposed methodology for vulnerability assessment was tested and found operational. This method can be replicated irrespective of spatial scales and can be modified for other disasters by streamlining hazard specific indicators.
- Pakistan,
- Punjab,
- Urban flooding,
- Vulnerability assessment

FullText(HTML)

References(50)

References

Adger, W.N. 2006. Vulnerability. Global Environmental Change 16(3): 268–281.

Adger, W.N., N. Brooks, G. Bentham, M. Agnew, and S. Eriksen. 2004. New indicators of vulnerability and adaptive capacity. Norwich: University of East Anglia. http://dcms.lwec.ulcc.ac.uk/sites/default/files/it1_11.pdf. Accessed 27 May 2017.

Armaş, I. 2012. Multi-criteria vulnerability analysis to earthquake hazard of Bucharest, Romania. Natural Hazards 63(2): 1129–1156.

Balica, S.F., N. Douben, and N.G. Wright. 2009. Flood vulnerability indices at varying spatial scales. Water Science & Technology 60(10): 2571–2580.

Balica, S.F., N.G. Wright, and F. van der Meulen. 2012. A flood vulnerability index for coastal cities and its use in assessing climate change impacts. Natural Hazards 64(1): 73–105.

Birkmann, J. 2006. Measuring vulnerability to promote disaster-resilient societies: Conceptual frameworks and definitions. In Measuring vulnerability to natural hazards: Towards disaster resilient societies, ed. J. Birkmann, 9–54. Tokyo: United Nations University—Institute for Environment and Human Security (UNU-EHS).

Birkmann, J., O.D. Cardona, M.L. Carreño, A.H. Barbat, M. Pelling, S. Schneiderbauer, S. Kienberger, M. Keiler, D. Alexander, P. Zeil, T. Welle. 2013. Framing vulnerability, risk and societal responses: The MOVE framework. Natural Hazards 67(2): 193–211.

Bogardi, J., and J. Birkmann. 2004. Vulnerability assessment: The first step towards sustainable risk reduction. In Disasters and society–from hazard assessment to risk reduction, ed. D. Malzahn, and T. Plapp, 75–82. Berlin: Logos Verlag.

Bohle, H.G. 2001. Vulnerability and criticality: Perspectives from social geography. IHDP Update, Newsletter of the International Human Dimensions Programme on Global Environmental Change 2: Article 1.

Bollin, C., and R. Hidajat. 2006. Community-based risk index: Pilot implementation in Indonesia. In Measuring vulnerability to natural hazards: Towards disaster resilient societies, ed. J. Birkmann, 271–289. Tokyo: United Nations University – Institute for Environment and Human Security (UNU-EHS).

Briguglio, L. 1995. Small island developing states and their economic vulnerabilities. World Development 23(9): 1615–1632.

Cochran, W.G. 1977. Sampling techniques, 3rd edn. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

Cutter, S.L., B.J. Boruff, and W.L. Shirley. 2003. Social vulnerability to environmental hazards. Social Science Quarterly 84(2): 242–261.

Cutter, S.L., J.T. Mitchell, and M.S. Scott. 2000. Revealing the vulnerability of people and places: A case study of Georgetown county, South Carolina. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 90(4): 713–737.

Federal Flood Commission. 2012. Annual flood report 2012. Islamabad, Pakistan: Federal Flood Commission.

Fuchs, S., J. Birkmann, and T. Glade. 2012. Vulnerability assessment in natural hazard and risk analysis: Current approaches and future challenges. Natural Hazards 64(3): 1969–1975.

Gain, A.K., V. Mojtahed, C. Biscaro, S. Balbi, and C. Giupponi. 2015. An integrated approach of flood risk assessment in the eastern part of Dhaka city. Natural Hazards 79(3): 1–32.

Hahn, M.B., A.M. Riederer, and S.O. Foster. 2009. The livelihood vulnerability index: A pragmatic approach to assessing risks from climate variability and change—A case study in Mozambique. Global Environmental Change 19(1): 74–88.

Hallegatte, S., C. Green, R.J. Nicholls, and J. Corfee-Morlot. 2013. Future flood losses in major coastal cities. Nature Climate Change 3(9): 802–806.

Ho, M., D. Shaw, S.Lin, and Y. Chiu. 2008. How do disaster characteristics influence risk perception? Risk Analysis 28(3): 635–643.

IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). 2012. Managing the risks of extreme events and disasters to advance climate change adaptation: Special report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Jamshed, A., I.A. Rana, J. Birkmann, and O. Nadeem. 2017. Changes in vulnerability and response capacities of rural communities after extreme events: Case of major floods of 2010 and 2014 in Pakistan. Journal of Extreme Events 4(3): 1–29.

Janssen, M.A., and E. Ostrom. 2006. Resilience, vulnerability, and adaptation: A cross-cutting theme of the international human dimensions programme on global environmental change. Global Environmental Change 16(3): 237–239.

López-Martínez, F., S. Gil-Guirado, and A. Pérez-Morales. 2017. Who can you trust? Implications of institutional vulnerability in flood exposure along the Spanish Mediterranean Coast. Environmental Science & Policy 76: 29–39.

Mazumdar, J., and S.K. Paul. 2016. Socioeconomic and infrastructural vulnerability indices for cyclones in the eastern coastal states of India. Natural Hazards 82(3): 1621–1643.

Miceli, R., I. Sotgiu, and M. Settanni. 2008. Disaster preparedness and perception of flood risk: A study in an Alpine Valley in Italy. Journal of Environmental Psychology 28(2): 164–173.

NDMA (National Disaster Management Authority). 2012. National disaster management plan 2012. Islamabad, Pakistan: National Disaster Management Authority.

Pandey, R., and S.K. Jha. 2012. Climate vulnerability index - Measure of climate change vulnerability to communities: A case of rural Lower Himalaya, India. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 17(5): 487–506.

Papathoma-Köhle, M., B. Gems, M. Sturm, and S. Fuchs. 2017. Matrices, curves and indicators: A review of approaches to assess physical vulnerability to debris flows. Earth-Science Reviews 171: 272–288.

Phung, D., S. Rutherford, F. Dwirahmadi, C. Chu, C.M. Do, T. Nguyen, and N. Chi Duong. 2016. The spatial distribution of vulnerability to the health impacts of flooding in the Mekong Delta, Vietnam. International Journal of Biometeorology 60(6): 857–865.

Polsky, C., R. Neff, and B. Yarnal. 2007. Building comparable global change vulnerability assessments: The vulnerability scoping diagram. Global Environmental Change 17(3–4): 472–485.

Punjab Bureau of Statistics. 2014. Punjab development statistics 2014. Lahore: Punjab Bureau of Statistics. http://www.bos.gop.pk/publicationreports. Accessed 30 Oct 2017.

Rana, I.A., S.S. Bhatti, and S. Saqib. 2017. The spatial and temporal dynamics of infrastructure development disparity – From assessment to analyses. Cities 63: 20–32.

Rana, I.A., and J.K. Routray. 2016. Actual vis-à-vis perceived risk of flood prone urban communities in Pakistan. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 19: 366–378.

Rana, I.A., and J.K. Routray. 2018. Integrated methodology for flood risk assessment and application in urban communities of Pakistan. Natural Hazards 91(1): 239–266.

Sadia, H., M.J. Iqbal, J. Ahmad, A. Ali, and A. Ahmad. 2016. Gender-sensitive public health risks and vulnerabilities’ assessment with reference to floods in Pakistan. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 19: 47–56.

Saqib, S.E., M.M. Ahmad, S. Panezai, and I.A. Rana. 2016. An empirical assessment of farmers’ risk attitudes in flood-prone areas of Pakistan. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 18: 107–114.

Schröter, D., C. Polsky, and A.G. Patt. 2005. Assessing vulnerabilities to the effects of global change: An eight step approach. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 10(4): 573–595.

Shah, A.A., J. Ye, M. Abid, J. Khan, and S.M. Amir. 2018. Flood hazards: Household vulnerability and resilience in disaster-prone districts of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Province, Pakistan. Natural Hazards 93(1): 147–165.

Tate, E. 2012. Social vulnerability indices: A comparative assessment using uncertainty and sensitivity analysis. Natural Hazards 63(2): 325–347.

Terpstra, T., and J.M. Gutteling. 2008. Households’ perceived responsibilities in flood risk management in the Netherlands. International Journal of Water Resources Development 24(4): 555–565.

Thouret, J., S. Ettinger, M. Guitton, O. Santoni, C. Magill, K. Martelli, G. Zuccaro, V. Revilla, J.A. Charca, and A. Arguedas. 2014. Assessing physical vulnerability in large cities exposed to flash floods and debris flows: The case of Arequipa (Peru). Natural Hazards 73(3): 1771–1815.

Turner, B.L., R.E. Kasperson, P.A. Matson, J.J. McCarthy, R.W. Corell, L. Christensen, N. Eckley, J.X. Kasperson, A. Luerse, M.L. Martello, C. Polsky, A. Pulsipher, and A. Schiller. 2003. A framework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 100(14): 8074–8079.

UNISDR (United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction). 2004. Living with risk: A global review of disaster reduction initiatives. Geneva: UNISDR. http://www.unisdr.org/we/inform/publications/657. Accessed 30 Oct 2017.

UNISDR (United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction). 2009. UNISDR terminology on disaster risk reduction. Geneva: UNISDR. https://www.unisdr.org/publications. Accessed 30 Oct 2017.

Willroth, P., J.R. Diez, and N. Arunotai. 2011. Modelling the economic vulnerability of households in the Phang-Nga Province (Thailand) to natural disasters. Natural Hazards 58(2): 753–769.

Wisner, B., P. Blaikie, T. Cannon, and I. Davis. 2004. At risk: Natural hazards, people’s vulnerability and disasters, 2nd edn. London: Routledge.

WMO (World Meteorological Organization). 2015. Seventeenth world meteorological congress, Geneva, 25 May–12 June 2015, Abridged final report with resolutions. Geneva: World Meteorological Organization. https://library.wmo.int/opac/doc_num.php?explnum_id=3138. Accessed 02 Apr 2018.

Yoon, D.K. 2012. Assessment of social vulnerability to natural disasters: A comparative study. Natural Hazards 63(2): 823–843.

Zhou, Y., Y. Liu, W. Wu, and N. Li. 2015. Integrated risk assessment of multi-hazards in China. Natural Hazards 78(1): 257–280.

Relative Articles

Supplements(0)

Cited By

Proportional views