Advance Search
Volume 13 Issue 2
Jul.  2022
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Article Navigation >  International Journal of Disaster Risk Science  > 2022  >  13(2): 230-248
Subhajyoti Samaddar, Ha Si, Xinyu Jiang, Junho Choi, Hirokazu Tatano. How Participatory is Participatory Flood Risk Mapping? Voices from the Flood Prone Dharavi Slum in Mumbai[J]. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2022, 13(2): 230-248. doi: 10.1007/s13753-022-00406-5
Citation: Subhajyoti Samaddar, Ha Si, Xinyu Jiang, Junho Choi, Hirokazu Tatano. How Participatory is Participatory Flood Risk Mapping? Voices from the Flood Prone Dharavi Slum in Mumbai[J]. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2022, 13(2): 230-248. doi: 10.1007/s13753-022-00406-5
shu

How Participatory is Participatory Flood Risk Mapping? Voices from the Flood Prone Dharavi Slum in Mumbai

doi: 10.1007/s13753-022-00406-5

  • 1 Disaster Prevention Research Institute, Kyoto University, Kyoto, 6110011, Japan;

  • 2 School of Management, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan, 430070, China;

  • 3 Disaster and Safety Management, Soongsil University, Seoul, 06978, South Korea

Funds:

The authors wish to express their thanks to the leaders and residents of Rajiv Gandhi Nagar, Dharavi who have enthusiastically supported this study for a very long time. Not only did they participate in the risk mapping exercise, but they were engaged throughout the process and played a key role in guiding it. Thank you also for the tremendous assistance provided by the students of Sir J. J. College of Architecture, Mumbai, and School of Planning and Architecture, New Delhi, in carrying out this risk mapping exercise. This project was supported by Future Development Research Funding Program FY 2017, Kyoto University Research Coordination Alliance.

  • Available Online: 2022-07-06
    Abstract
  • Participatory flood risk mapping (PFRM) is a well-recognized and widely implemented tool for meaningful community involvement in disaster risk reduction (DRR). The effectiveness of PFRM remains anecdotal. The PFRM exercise has rarely been applied identically in two different places by two different organizations, which produces varied and uncertain outcomes. In the absence of any agreed and comprehensive framework for participatory DRR, existing studies struggle to provide a scientific account of how the structure, design, and process of PFRM ensure the effective participation of local communities. This study, examines what factors and methods make PFRM an effective participatory DRR tool. In this study, we first identified the process-based criteria of participation. Then we briefly introduced a participatory flood risk mapping exercise conducted in a flood-prone informal settlement in Dharavi, Mumbai. The exercise was carefully designed to meet the process criteria of effective participation. Finally, using qualitative research methods, we evaluated the effectiveness of our PFRM from the local community perspective. The findings show that ensuring community livelihood security and true involvement of marginalized groups, preparing an action plan, and incorporating fun and cultural connotations into the facilitation process are critical components that enhance community participation through PFRM in DRR.
    • FullText(HTML)
  • loading
    • References(77)
  • Aalst, M.K. van, T. Cannon, and I. Burton. 2008. Community level adaptation to climate change:The potential role of participatory community risk assessment. Global Environmental Change 18(1):165-179.
    Amendola, A., J. Linnerooth-Bayer, N. Okada, and P. Shi. 2008. Towards integrated disaster risk management:Case studies and trends from Asia. Natural Hazards 44(2):163-168.
    Ardaya, A.B., M. Evers, and L. Ribbe. 2019. Participatory approaches for disaster risk governance? Exploring participatory mechanisms and mapping to close the communication gap between population living in flood risk areas and authorities in Nova Friburgo Municipality, RJ Brazil. Land Use Policy 88:104103.
    Arnstein, S.R. 1969. A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners 35(4):216-224.
    Bajek, R., Y. Matsuda, and N. Okada. 2008. Japan's Jishu-bosai-soshiki community activities:Analysis of its role in participatory community disaster risk management. Natural Hazards 44(2):281-292.
    Bardhan, R., D. Sarkar, A. Jana, and N.R. Velaga. 2015. Mumbai slums since independence:Evaluating the policy outcomes. Habitat International 50:1-11.
    Bhagat, R.B., M. Guha, and A. Chattopadhyay. 2006. Mumbai after 26/7 deluge:Issues and concerns in urban planning. Population and Environment 27(4):337-349.
    Blackstock, K.L., G. Kelly, and B. Horsey. 2007. Developing and applying a framework to evaluate participatory research for sustainability. Ecological Economics 60(4):726-742.
    Blahna, D.J., and S. Yonts-Shepard. 1989. Public involvement in resource planning:Toward bridging the gap between policy and implementation. Society & Natural Resources 2(1):209-227.
    Boyd, E., A. Ghosh, and M. Boykoff. 2015. Climate change adaptation in Mumbai, India. In The urban climate challenge:Rethinking the role of cities in the global climate regime, ed. C. Johnson, N. Toly, and H. Schroeder, 139-155. New York:Routledge.
    Butsch, C., F. Kraas, S. Namperumal, and G. Peters. 2016. Risk governance in the megacity Mumbai/India:A complex adaptive system perspective. Habitat International 54(2):100-111.
    Cadag, J.R.D., and J.C. Gaillard. 2012. Integrating knowledge and actions in disaster risk reduction:The contribution of participatory mapping. Area 44(1):100-109.
    Cappucci, M. 2020. Devastating monsoon flooding strikes Mumbai, a city gripped by the coronavirus pandemic. The Washington Post, 7 August 2020. https://www.washingtonpost.com/weather/2020/08/07/mumbai-india-monsoon/. Accessed 20 Feb 2022.
    Carr, G., G. Blöschl, and D.P. Loucks. 2012. Evaluating participation in water resource management:A review. Water Resources Research 48(11):W11401.
    Chase, L.C., D.J. Decker, and T.B. Lauber. 2004. Public participation in wildlife management:What do stakeholders want?. Society and Natural Resources 17(7):629-639.
    Chatterjee, M. 2010. Slum dwellers response to flooding events in the megacities of India. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 15(4):337-353.
    Chatterjee, M. 2011. Flood loss redistribution in a third world megacity:The case of Mumbai. In Coping with global environmental change, disasters and security:Threats, challenges, vulnerabilities and risks, ed. H.G. Brauch, U.O. Spring, C. Mesjasz, J. Grin, P. Kameri-Mbote, B. Chourou, P. Dunay, and J. Birkmann, 603-612. Berlin:Springer.
    Chess, C., and K. Purcell. 1999. Public participation and the environment:Do we know what works?. Environmental Science & Technology 33(16):2685-2692.
    Chingombe, W., E. Pedzisai, D. Manatsa, G. Mukwada, and P. Taru. 2015. A participatory approach in GIS data collection for flood risk management, Muzarabani district Zimbabwe. Arabian Journal of Geosciences 8(2):1029-1040.
    de Sherbinin, A., and G. Bardy. 2015. Social vulnerability to floods in two coastal megacities:New York City and Mumbai. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research 13:131-165.
    Deshpande, T. 2020. Mumbai flood breaches new frontiers. Mongabay, 12 August 2020. https://india.mongabay.com/2020/08/mumbai-flood-breaches-new-frontiers/. Accessed 20 Feb 2022.
    Fazey, I.R.A., M. Kesby, A. Evely, I. Latham, D. Wagatora, J.-E. Hagasua, M.S. Reed, and M. Christie. 2010. A three-tiered approach to participatory vulnerability assessment in the Solomon Islands. Global Environmental Change 20(4):713-728.
    Gaillard, J.-C., and E.A. Maceda. 2009. Participatory three-dimensional mapping for disaster risk reduction. Participatory Learning and Action 60:109-118.
    Ganapati, N.E., and S. Ganapati. 2008. Enabling participatory planning after disasters:A case study of the World Bank's housing reconstruction in Turkey. Journal of the American Planning Association 75(1):41-59.
    Gladfelter, S. 2018. The politics of participation in community-based early warning systems:Building resilience or precarity through local roles in disseminating disaster information?. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 30:120-131.
    Glucker, A.N., P.P. Driessen, A. Kolhoff, and H.A.C. Runhaar. 2013. Public participation in environmental impact assessment:Why, who and how?. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 43:104-111.
    Gopalakrishnan, C., and N. Okada. 2007. Designing new institutions for implementing integrated disaster risk management:Key elements and future directions. Disasters 31(4):353-372.
    Gupta, K. 2007. Urban flood resilience planning and management and lessons for the future:A case study of Mumbai India. Urban Water Journal 4(3):183-194.
    Hochrainer-Stigler, S., C. Colon, G. Boza, S. Poledna, E. Rovenskaya, and U. Dieckmann. 2020. Enhancing resilience of systems to individual and systemic risk:Steps toward an integrative framework. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 51:101868.
    Israel, B.A., A.J. Schulz, E.A. Parker, and A.B. Becker. 1998. Review of community-based research:Assessing partnership approaches to improve public health. Annual Review of Public Health 19(1):173-202.
    Laurian, L., and M.M. Shaw. 2009. Evaluation of public participation:The practices of certified planners. Journal of Planning Education and Research 28(3):293-309.
    Liu, W., S. Dugar, I. McCallum, G. Thapa, L. See, P. Khadka, N. Budhathoki, and S. Brown et al. 2018. Integrated participatory and collaborative risk mapping for enhancing disaster resilience. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 7(2):68.
    Luyet, V., R. Schlaepfer, M.B. Parlange, and A. Buttler. 2012. A framework to implement stakeholder participation in environmental projects. Journal of Environmental Management 111:213-219.
    Maskrey, S.A., S. Priest, and N.J. Mount. 2019. Towards evaluation criteria in participatory flood risk management. Journal of Flood Risk Management 12(2):e12462.
    Mercer, J., I. Kelman, K. Lloyd, and S. Suchet-Pearson. 2008. Reflections on use of participatory research for disaster risk reduction. Area 40(2):172-183.
    McCool, S.F., and K. Guthrie. 2001. Mapping the dimensions of successful public participation in messy natural resources management situations. Society & Natural Resources 14(4):309-323.
    Minucci, G., D. Molinari, G. Gemini, and S. Pezzoli. 2020. Enhancing flood risk maps by a participatory and collaborative design process. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 50:101747.
    Moore, S.A. 1996. Defining "successful" environmental dispute resolution:Case studies from public land planning in the United States and Australia. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 16(3):151-169.
    Na, J.I., N. Okada, and L. Fang. 2008. A collaborative action development approach to improving community disaster reduction using the Yonmenkaigi system. Journal of Natural Disaster Science 30(2):57-69.
    Okada, N., J. Na, L. Fang, and A. Teratani. 2013. The Yonmenkaigi System Method:An implementation oriented group decision support approach. Group Decision and Negotiation 22(1):53-67.
    Osti, R., S. Tanaka, and T. Tokioka. 2008. Flood hazard mapping in developing countries:Problems and prospects. Disaster Prevention and Management 17(1):104-113.
    Parthasarathy, D. 2011. Hunters, gatherers and foragers in a metropolis:Commonising the private and public in Mumbai. Economic and Political Weekly 46(50):54-63.
    Parthasarathy, D. 2015. Informality, resilience, and the political implications of disaster governance. Pacific Affairs 88(3):551-575.
    Parthasarathy, D. 2016. Decentralization, pluralization, balkanization? Challenges for disaster mitigation and governance in Mumbai. Habitat International 52(8):26-34.
    Patankar, A.M. 2015. The exposure, vulnerability, and ability to respond of poor households to recurrent floods in Mumbai. Policy Research Working Paper:7481. Washington, DC:World Bank.
    Patankar, A., and A. Patwardhan. 2016. Estimating the uninsured losses due to extreme weather events and implications for informal sector vulnerability:A case study of Mumbai India. Natural Hazards 80(1):285-310.
    Pathak, S., M. Liu, D. Jato-Espino, and C. Zevenbergen. 2020. Social, economic and environmental assessment of urban sub-catchment flood risks using a multi-criteria approach:A case study in Mumbai City India. Journal of Hydrology 591(4):125216.
    Reed, M.S. 2008. Stakeholder participation for environmental management:A literature review. Biological Conservation 141(10):2417-2431.
    Reichel, C., and U.U. Frömming. 2014. Participatory mapping of local disaster risk reduction knowledge:An example from Switzerland. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science 5(1):41-54.
    Rollason, E., L.J. Bracken, R.J. Hardy, and A.R.G. Large. 2018. Rethinking flood risk communication. Natural Hazards 92(3):1665-1686.
    Rowe, G., and L.J. Frewer. 2000. Public participation methods:A framework for evaluation. Science, Technology & Human Values 25(1):3-29.
    Rowe, G., and L.J. Frewer. 2005. A typology of public engagement mechanisms. Science, Technology & Human Values 30(2):251-290.
    Sadiqi, Z., B. Trigunarsyah, and V. Coffey. 2017. A framework for community participation in post-disaster housing reconstruction projects:A case of Afghanistan. International Journal of Project Management 35(5):900-912.
    Samaddar, S., and N. Okada. 2006. Participatory approach for post-earthquake reconstruction in the villages of Kachchh, India. Annuals of Disaster Prevention Research Institute, Kyoto University 49:197-205.
    Samaddar, S., and H. Tatano. 2015. Where do individuals seek opinions for evacuation? A case study from landslide-prone slum communities in Mumbai. Journal of Natural Disaster Science 36(1):13-24.
    Samaddar, S., B.A. Misra, R. Chatterjee, and H. Tatano. 2011. Participatory risk mapping for identifying spatial risks in flood-prone slum areas, Mumbai. Annuals of Disaster Prevention Research Institute, Kyoto University 54:137-146.
    Samaddar, S., B.A. Misra, R. Chatterjee, and H. Tatano. 2012. Understanding community's evacuation intention development process in a flood prone micro-hotspot, Mumbai. Journal of Integrated Disaster Risk Management 2(2):89-107.
    Samaddar, S., R. Chatterjee, B. Misra, and H. Tatano. 2014. Outcome-expectancy and self-efficacy:Reasons or results of flood preparedness intention?. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 8:91-99.
    Samaddar, S., J. Choi, B.A. Misra, and H. Tatano. 2015. Insights on social learning and collaborative action plan development for flood risks mitigation:Practicing Yonmenkaigi System Method (YSM) in flood prone Mumbai. Natural Hazards 75(2):1531-1554.
    Samaddar, S., M. Yokomatsu, T. Dzivenu, M. Oteng-Ababio, M.R. Adams, F. Dayour, and H. Ishikawa. 2015. Evaluating effective public participation in disaster management and climate change adaptation:Insights from northern Ghana through a user-based approach. Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy 6(1):117-143.
    Samaddar, S., N. Okada, J. Choi, and H. Tatano. 2017. What constitutes successful participatory disaster risk management? Insights from post-earthquake reconstruction work in rural Gujarat India. Natural Hazards 85(1):111-138.
    Samaddar, S., A.J. Ayaribilla, M. Oteng-Ababio, F. Dayour, and M. Yokomatsu. 2019. Stakeholders' perceptions on effective community participation in climate change adaptation. In Sustainable solutions for food security:Combating climate change by adaptation, ed. A. Sarkar, S.R. Sensarma, and G.W. van Loon, 355-379. Cham:Springer.
    Samaddar, S., M. Oteng-Ababio, F. Dayour, A. Ayaribila, F.K. Obeng, R. Ziem, and M. Yokomatsu. 2021. Successful community participation in climate change adaptation programs:On whose terms?. Environmental Management 67(4):747-762.
    Scolobig, A., M. Thompson, and J. Linnerooth-Bayer. 2016. Compromise not consensus:Designing a participatory process for landslide risk mitigation. Natural Hazards 81(1):45-68.
    Sharma, K. 2000. Rediscovering Dharavi:Stories from Asia's largest slum. New Delhi:Penguin Books India.
    Sherly, M.A., S. Karmakar, D. Parthasarathy, T. Chan, and C. Rau. 2015. Disaster vulnerability mapping for a densely populated coastal urban area:An application to Mumbai, India. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 105(6):1198-1220.
    Sheng, Y.K. 1990. Community participation in low-income housing projects:Problems and prospects. Community Development Journal 25(1):56-65.
    Surjan, A., and R. Shaw. 2009. Enhancing disaster resilience through local environment management:Case of Mumbai, India. Disaster Prevention and Management:An International Journal 18(4):418-433.
    Thakadu, O.T. 2005. Success factors in community-based natural resources management in northern Botswana:Lessons from practice. Natural Resources Forum 29(3):199-212.
    Tozier de la Poterie, A., and M.-A. Baudoin. 2015. From Yokohama to Sendai:Approaches to participation in international disaster risk reduction frameworks. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science 6(2):128-139.
    Tuler, S., and T. Webler. 1999. Voices from the forest:What participants expect of a public participation process. Society & Natural Resources 12(5):437-453.
    Vallance, S. 2015. Disaster recovery as participation:Lessons from the Shaky Isles. Natural Hazards 75(2):1287-1301.
    Van Aalst, M.K., T. Cannon, and I. Burton. 2008. Community level adaptation to climate change:The potential role of participatory community risk assessment. Global Environmental Change 18(1):165-179.
    Webler, T., and S. Tuler. 2006. Four perspectives on public participation process in environmental assessment and decision making:Combined results from 10 case studies. Policy Studies Journal 34(4):699-722.
    Webler, T., S. Tuler, and R.O.B. Krueger. 2001. What is a good public participation process? Five perspectives from the public. Environmental Management 27(3):435-450.
    White, I., R. Kingston, and A. Barker. 2010. Participatory geographic information systems and public engagement within flood risk management. Journal of Flood Risk Management 3(4):337-346.
    Yamori, K. 2009. Action research on disaster reduction education:Building a "community of practice" through a gaming approach. Journal of Natural Disaster Science 30(2):83-96.
    • Relative Articles
    • Supplements(0)
    • Cited By
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索
    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML

    Article Metrics

    Article views (459) PDF downloads(0) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    Add: 19 XinjieKouwai Street, HaiDian District, Beijing 100875, China

    E-mail: ijdrs@bnu.edu.cn

    Tel: +86-10-58808661

    Copyright 2020 © Beijing Normal University

    Email alert RSS

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd  

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return