Advance Search
Volume 14 Issue 3
Jul.  2023
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Article Navigation >  International Journal of Disaster Risk Science  > 2023  >  14(3): 369-381
Haorui Wu, Lindsay K. Heyland, Mandy Yung, Maryam Schneider. Human–Animal Interactions in Disaster Settings: A Systematic Review[J]. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2023, 14(3): 369-381. doi: 10.1007/s13753-023-00496-9
Citation: Haorui Wu, Lindsay K. Heyland, Mandy Yung, Maryam Schneider. Human–Animal Interactions in Disaster Settings: A Systematic Review[J]. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2023, 14(3): 369-381. doi: 10.1007/s13753-023-00496-9
shu

Human–Animal Interactions in Disaster Settings: A Systematic Review

doi: 10.1007/s13753-023-00496-9

  • 1. School of Social Work, Faculty of Health, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, B3H 4R2, Canada;

  • 2. Department of Psychology, Mount Saint Vincent University, Halifax, NS, B3M 2J6, Canada

Funds:

This research was supported by the Research Development Grants in the Faculty of Health at Dalhousie University, Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada, Knowledge Synthesis Grants (Award # 872-2021-0016) and Partnership Engage Grants (Award # 892-2021-3013). This research was also undertaken, in part, thanks to funding from the Canada Research Chairs Program (Award # CRC-2020-00128).

  • Accepted Date: 2023-06-06
    • Available Online: 2023-07-03
  • Publish Date: 2023-06-17
    Abstract
  • This systematic review aimed to assess the current knowledge of human–animal interactions (HAIs) in disaster settings and identify areas for future research. A Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses search was conducted on three multidisciplinary databases, identifying English-language journal articles published between January 2000 and February 2022 that explored the benefits of and challenges associated with HAI in disasters and emergencies. The review analyzed 94 articles using both quantitative and qualitative methods. The review found a paucity of universal terminology to describe the bidirectional relationship between humans and animals during disasters and a failure to include all animal types in every stage of disaster and emergency management. Additionally, research predominantly focused on the health and well-being benefits of HAI for humans rather than animals. Efforts to promote social and environmental justice for humans and their co-inhabitants should support the welfare of both humans and animals in disaster settings. Four recommendations were developed based on these findings to increase the inclusion of HAI in research, policy, and practice. Limitations of the review included the exclusion of pre-2000 articles and all grey literature, limited research examining different combinations of animal and disaster types, and limited research outside of North America.
    • FullText(HTML)
  • loading
    • References(83)
  • Aamodt, N.O. 2018. The potential for disease initiation by inhaled beta-emitting nuclear particles. Medical Hypotheses 116: 124–131.
    American Veterinary Medical Association. n.d. PETS Act (FAQ). https://www.avma.org/pets-act-faq. Accessed 3 Jan 2023.
    Anthony, R. 2003. Animals and their moral standing: A philosophical exploration of the relationship between animals and human beings in agriculture. PhD dissertation, Purdue University, West Lafayette, USA.
    Applebaum, J.W., C. Ellison, L. Struckmeyer, B.A. Zsembik, and S.E. McDonald. 2021. The impact of pets on everyday life for older adults during the COVID-19 pandemic. Frontiers in Public Health. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.652610.
    Applebaum, J.W., C.A. Tomlinson, A. Matijczak, S.E. McDonald, and B.A. Zsembik. 2020. The concerns, difficulties, and stressors of caring for pets during COVID-19: Results from a large survey of U.S. pet owners. Animals 10(10): Article 1882.
    Asaaga, F.A., J.C. Young, M.A. Oommen, R. Chandarana, J. August, J. Joshi, M.M. Chanda, and A.T. Vanak et al. 2021. Operationalising the “One Health” approach in India: Facilitators of and barriers to effective cross-sector convergence for zoonoses prevention and control. BMC Public Health 21: 1–21.
    Bebber, D.P. 2019. Climate change effects on Black Sigatoka Disease of banana. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 374(1775): Article 20180269.
    Bernard, K., A. Davis, I.M. Simpson, V.L. Hale, J. Lee, and R.J. Winston. 2022. Detection of SARS-COV-2 in urban stormwater: An environmental reservoir and potential interface between human and animal sources. Science of the Total Environment 807(3): Article 151046.
    Boni, M.F., B.H. Manh, P.Q. Thai, J. Farrar, T.T. Hien, N.T. Hien, N.V. Kinh, and P. Horby. 2009. Modelling the progression of pandemic Influenza A (H1N1) in Vietnam and the opportunities for reassortment with other influenza viruses. BMC Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-7-43.
    Bowen, J., E. García, P. Darder, J. Argüelles, and J. Fatjó. 2020. The effects of the Spanish Covid-19 lockdown on people, their pets, and the human-animal bond. Journal of Veterinary Behavior 40: 75–91.
    Brackenridge, S., L.K. Zottarelli, E. Rider, and B. Carlsen-Landy. 2012. Dimensions of the human-animal bond and evacuation decisions among pet owners during Hurricane Ike. Anthrozoös 25(2): 229–238.
    Bulanda, S. 2014. Ready! Training the Search and Rescue Dog. Freehold, NJ: CompanionHouse Books.
    Bussolari, C., J. Currin-McCulloch, W. Packman, L. Kogan, and P. Erdman. 2021. “I Couldn’t have asked for a better quarantine partner!”: Experiences with companion dogs during Covid-19. Animals 11(2): Article 330.
    Čapek, S.M. 2010. Foregrounding nature: An invitation to think about shifting nature-city boundaries. City and Community 9(2): 208–224.
    Carr, D., E. Friedmann, N.R. Gee, C. Gilchrist, N. Sachs-Ericsson, and L. Koodaly. 2021. Dog walking and the social impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on loneliness in older adults. Animals 11(7): Article 1852.
    Chen, F., and R. Yuan. 2020. Reconsideration of the plague transmission in perspective of multi-host zoonotic disease model with interspecific interaction. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering 17(5): 4422–4442.
    Clements, H., S. Valentin, N. Jenkins, J. Rankin, N.R. Gee, D. Snellgrove, and K.A. Sloman. 2021. Companion animal type and level of engagement matter: A mixed-methods study examining links between companion animal guardianship, loneliness and well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic. Animals 11(8): Article 2349.
    Covidence. 2022. Better systematic review management software. Melbourne: Veritas Health Innovation. www.covidence.org. Accessed 8 June 2023.
    Darroch, J., and C. Adamson. 2016. Companion animals and disasters: The role of human services organisations. Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work 28(4): 100–108.
    des Roches, A.D.B., I. Veissier, X. Boivin, E. Gilot-Fromont, and L. Mounier. 2016. A prospective exploration of farm, farmer, and animal characteristics in human-animal relationships: An epidemiological survey. Journal of Dairy Science 99(7): 5573–5585.
    Dowsley, M., and G. Wenzel. 2009. “The time of the most polar bears”: A co-management conflict in Nunavut. Arctic 61(2): 119–231.
    Egeru, A., S.W. Dejene, and A. Siya. 2020. Short report on implications of Covid-19 and emerging zoonotic infectious diseases for pastoralists and Africa. Pastoralism. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13570-020-00173-2.
    Esmaeilnejad, M., E. Bazrafshan, and A. Ansari-Moghaddam. 2018. Effect of climatic changes on spatial distribution of zoonoses: A case study from South Khorasan Province, Iran. Health Scope 7(1): Article e56045.
    Every, D., C. Due, K. Thompson, and J. Ryan. 2016. Conflicting perspectives on nonhuman animal rescues in natural disasters. Society and Animals 24(4): 358–382.
    Farmer, A.K., and S.E. DeYoung. 2019. The pets of Hurricane Matthew: Evacuation and sheltering with companion animals. Anthrozoös 32(3): 419–433.
    Grajfoner, D., G.N. Ke, and R.M.M. Wong. 2021. The effect of pets on human mental health and wellbeing during COVID-19 lockdown in Malaysia. Animals 11(9): Article 2689.
    Gu, X., S.M. Bexell, and B. Wang. 2021. Attitudes toward nonhuman animals during the Coronavirus Disease (Covid-19) outbreak in China. Anthrozoös 35(2): 1–17.
    Gurtner, Y., and S. Parison. 2021. Promoting owner responsibility for pets in disasters. Australian Journal of Emergency Management 36(3): 37–43.
    Hassani, A., and G. Khan. 2020. Human-animal interaction and the emergence of SARS-COV-2. JMIR Public Health and Surveillance 6(4): Article e22117.
    Heath, S.E., A.M. Beck, P.H. Kass, and L.T. Glickman. 2001. Risk factors for pet evacuation failure after a slow-onset disaster. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 218(124): 1905–1910.
    Heyland, L., and H. Wu. 2022. Human-animal interactions and disaster: A systematic literature review. DesignSafe-CI. https://doi.org/10.17603/ds2-b72f-4d09.
    Hill, L., H. Winefield, and P. Bennett. 2020. Are stronger bonds better? Examining the relationship between the human-animal bond and human social support, and its impact on resilience. Australian Psychologist 55(6): 729–738.
    Hoffman, C.L. 2021. The experience of teleworking with dogs and cats in the United States during COVID-19. Animals 11(2): Article 268.
    Hooper, J., T. Aiello, and K. Hill. 2021. Portrayals of animals in Covid-19 news media. Anthrozoös 35(2): 237–257.
    Hosey, G., and V. Melfi. 2014. Human-animal interactions, relationships and bonds: A review and analysis of the literature. International Journal of Comparative Psychology 27(1): 117–142.
    Jacobs, J., and L.A. Reese. 2021. Compassion fatigue among animal shelter volunteers: Examining personal and organizational risk factors. Anthrozoös 34(6): 803–821.
    Jenkins, A. 2017. Meet Frida the Mexican rescue dog who is saving lives in natural disasters. Time, 23 September 2017. https://time.com/4954826/frida-rescue-dog-mexico-city-earthquake/. Accessed 3 Jan 2023.
    Jezierski, T., I. Camerlink, R.S.E. Peden, J. Chou, and J. Marchewka. 2021. Changes in the health and behaviour of pet dogs during the Covid-19 pandemic as reported by the owners. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 241: Article 105395.
    Kahn, L.H. 2021. Developing a one health approach by using a multi-dimensional matrix. One Health 13: Article 100289.
    Kelemen, T.K., S.H. Matthews, M. Wan, and Y. Zhang. 2020. The secret life of pets: The intersection of animals and organizational life. Journal of Organizational Behavior 41(7): 694–697.
    Kogan, L.R., P. Erdman, C. Bussolari, J. Currin-McCulloch, and W. Packman. 2021. The initial months of COVID-19: Dog owners’ veterinary-related concerns. Frontiers in Veterinary Science 8: Article 629121.
    Krupnik, I. 2018. “Arctic crashes”: Revisiting the human-animal disequilibrium model in a time of rapid change. Human Ecology 46: 685–700.
    Lamb, G. 2019. Towards a green applied linguistics: Human-sea turtle semiotic assemblages in Hawai‘i. Applied Linguistics 41(6): 922–946.
    Leroy, F., A.H. Hite, and P. Gregorini. 2020. Livestock in evolving foodscapes and thoughtscapes. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems 4: Article 105.
    Matthew, R., S. Chiotha, J. Orbinski, and B. Talukder. 2022. Research note: Climate change, peri-urban space and emerging infectious disease. Landscape and Urban Planning 218: Article 104298.
    McCarthy, M., J. Bigelow, and M. Taylor. 2018. Emergency preparedness and planning for animals: A case study in the Blue Mountains, NSW. Australian Journal of Emergency Management 33(4): 50–56.
    McCumber, A., and Z. King. 2020. The wild in fire: Human aid to wildlife in the disasters of the Anthropocene. Environmental Values 29(1): 47–66.
    Morgan, L., A. Protopopova, R.I.D. Birkler, B. Itin-Shwartz, G.A. Sutton, A. Gamliel, B. Yakobson, and T. Raz. 2020. Human-dog relationships during COVID-19 pandemic: Booming dog adoption during social isolation. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 7: Article 155.
    Morris, A., H. Wu, and C. Morales. 2021. Barriers to care in veterinary services: Lessons learned from low-income pet guardians’ experiences at private clinics and hospitals during COVID-19. Frontiers in Veterinary Science 8: Article 764753.
    Mueller, M.K., A.M. Richer, K.S. Callina, and L. Charmaraman. 2021. Companion animal relationships and adolescent loneliness during COVID-19. Animals 11(3): Article 885.
    Ng, Z., T.C. Griffin, and L. Braun. 2021. The new status quo: Enhancing access to human-animal interactions to alleviate social isolation and loneliness in the time of Covid-19. Animals 11(10): Article 2769.
    Nieforth, L.O., and M.E. O’Haire. 2020. The role of pets in managing uncertainty from Covid-19. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy 12(S1): S245–S246.
    Packer, R.M.A., C.L. Brand, Z. Belshaw, C.L. Pegram, K.B. Stevens, and D.G. O’Neill. 2021. Pandemic puppies: Characterising motivations and behaviours of UK owners who purchased puppies during the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic. Animals 11(9): Article 2500.
    Page, M.J., J.E. McKenzie, P.M. Bossuyt, I. Boutron, T.C. Hoffmann, C.D. Mulrow, L. Shamseer, and J.M. Tetzlaff et al. 2021. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. PLoS Medicine 18(3): Article n71.
    Peek, L., J. Tobin, R.M. Adams, H.R. Wu, and M.C. Mathews. 2020. A framework for convergence research in the hazards and disaster field: The natural hazards engineering research infrastructure CONVERGE facility. Frontiers in Built Environment 6: Article 110.
    Piotti, P., C. Karagiannis, L. Satchell, M. Michelazzi, M. Albertini, E. Alleva, and F. Pirrone. 2021. Use of the Milan Pet Quality of Life Instrument (MPQL) to measure pets’ quality of life during COVID-19. Animals 11(5): Article 1336.
    Protopopova, A., L.H. Ly, B.H. Eagan, and K.M. Brown. 2021. Climate change and companion animals: Identifying links and opportunities for mitigation and adaptation strategies. Integrative and Comparative Biology 61(1): 166–181.
    Rabinowitz, P.M., B.J. Natterson-Horowitz, L.H. Kahn, R. Kock, and M. Pappaioanou. 2017. Incorporating one health into medical education. BMC Medical Education 17(1): Article 45.
    Ranspot, T. 2019. The relational nature of song in musical human-animal interactions in Tr’ondëk Hwëch’in traditional territory, Yukon. Journal of Ethnobiology 39(3): Article 478.
    Ratschen, E., E. Shoesmith, L. Shahab, K. Silva, D. Kale, P. Toner, C. Reeve, and D.S. Mills. 2020. Human-animal relationships and interactions during the COVID-19 lockdown phase in the UK: Investigating links with mental health and loneliness. PLoS ONE 15(9): Article e0239397.
    Rodriguez, K.E., H. Herzog, and N.R. Gee. 2021. Variability in human-animal interaction research. Frontiers in Veterinary Science 7: Article 619600.
    Sáenz-de-Santa-María, A., and J.L. Tellería. 2015. Wildlife-vehicle collisions in Spain. European Journal of Wildlife Research 61: 399–406.
    Schor, M., and A. Protopopova. 2021. Effect of Covid-19 on pet food bank servicing: Quantifying numbers of clients serviced in the Vancouver Downtown Eastside, British Columbia, Canada. Frontiers in Veterinary Science 8: Article 730390.
    Schumm, P., W. Schumm, and C. Scoglio. 2013. Impact of preventive responses to epidemics in rural regions. PLoS ONE 8(3): Article e59028.
    Seimenis, A., and G. Battelli. 2018. Main challenges in the control of zoonoses and related foodborne diseases in the South Mediterranean and Middle East region. Veterinaria Italiana 54(2): 97–106.
    Shoesmith, E., L.S. de Assis, L. Shahab, E. Ratschen, P. Toner, D. Kale, C. Reeve, and D.S. Mills. 2021. The perceived impact of the first UK Covid-19 lockdown on companion animal welfare and behaviour: A mixed-method study of associations with owner mental health. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18(11): Article 6171.
    Shoesmith, E., L. Shahab, D. Kale, D.S. Mills, C. Reeve, P. Toner, L.S. de Assis, and E. Ratschen. 2021. The influence of human-animal interactions on mental and physical health during the first COVID-19 lockdown phase in the U.K.: A qualitative exploration. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18(3): Article 976.
    Squance, H., C. MacDonald, C. Stewart, R. Prasanna, and D.M. Johnston. 2021. Strategies for implementing a one welfare framework into emergency management. Animals 11(11): Article 3141.
    Swabe, J. 1998. Animals, disease and human society: Human-animal relations and the rise of veterinary medicine. London: Routledge.
    Tambo, E., O.T. Adetunde, and O.A. Olalubi. 2018. Re-emerging Lassa fever outbreaks in Nigeria: Re-enforcing “One Health” community surveillance and emergency response practice. Infectious Diseases of Poverty 7(1): Article 37.
    Thompson, K., M. Leighton, and C. Riley. 2015. Helping hands, hurting hooves: Towards a multidisciplinary paradigm of large animal rescue. Australian Journal of Emergency Management 30(2): 53–58.
    Travers, C., C. Degeling, and M. Rock. 2017. Companion animals in natural disasters: A scoping review of scholarly sources. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science 20(4): 324–343.
    Trigg, J., K. Thompson, B. Smith, and P. Bennett. 2019. Archetyping relationships with companion animals to understand disaster risk-taking propensity. Journal of Risk Research 22(4): 475–496.
    Trigg, J.L., K. Thompson, B. Smith, and P. Bennett. 2016. A moveable beast: Subjective influence of human-animal relationships on risk perception, and risk behaviour during bushfire threat. The Qualitative Report 21(10): 1881–1903.
    Tschopp, R., A. Aseffa, E. Schelling, and J. Zinsstag. 2010. Farmers’ perceptions of livestock, agriculture, and natural resources in the rural Ethiopian Highlands. Mountain Research and Development 30(4): 381–390.
    Warfield, C. n.d. The disaster management cycle. https://www.gdrc.org/uem/disasters/1-dm_cycle.html. Accessed 3 Jan 2023.
    White, P. 2018. (UN)regulated relations: An ethnographic perspective of dog ownership on Isla Mujeres, Mexico. Anthrozoös 31(5): 615–625.
    Wild, I., A. Gedge, J. Burridge, and J. Burford. 2021. The impact of Covid-19 on the working equid community: Responses from 1530 individuals accessing NGO support in 14 low- and middle-income countries. Animals 11(5): Article 1363.
    Wilson, C.C. 1994. A conceptual framework for human-animal interaction research: The challenge revisited. Anthrozoös 7(1): 4–24.
    Woith, H., G.M. Petersen, S. Hainzl, and T. Dahm. 2018. Review: Can animals predict earthquakes?. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 108(3A): 1031–1045.
    Wu, H.R., R.S. Bains, A. Morris, and C. Morales. 2021. Affordability, feasibility, and accessibility: Companion animal guardians with (dis)abilities access to veterinary medical and behavioral services during COVID-19. Animals 11(8): Article 2359.
    Wu, H.R., and F. Etienne. 2021. Effect of climate change on food production (animal products). In A Comprehensive Study of Physical, Social, and Political Issues, ed. T.M. Letcher, 233–253. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
    Zottarelli, L.K. 2010. Broken bond: An exploration of human factors associated with companion animal loss during Hurricane Katrina. Sociological Forum 25(1): 110–122.
    • Relative Articles
    • Supplements(0)
    • Cited By
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索
    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML

    Article Metrics

    Article views (225) PDF downloads(0) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    Add: 19 XinjieKouwai Street, HaiDian District, Beijing 100875, China

    E-mail: ijdrs@bnu.edu.cn

    Tel: +86-10-58808661

    Copyright 2020 © Beijing Normal University

    Email alert RSS

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd  

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return