Volume 14 Issue 6
Dec.  2023
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Lida Huang, Tao Chen, Qing Deng, Yuli Zhou. Reasoning Disaster Chains with Bayesian Network Estimated Under Expert Prior Knowledge[J]. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2023, 14(6): 1011-1028. doi: 10.1007/s13753-023-00530-w
Citation: Lida Huang, Tao Chen, Qing Deng, Yuli Zhou. Reasoning Disaster Chains with Bayesian Network Estimated Under Expert Prior Knowledge[J]. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2023, 14(6): 1011-1028. doi: 10.1007/s13753-023-00530-w

Reasoning Disaster Chains with Bayesian Network Estimated Under Expert Prior Knowledge

doi: 10.1007/s13753-023-00530-w
Funds:

This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2021YFF0600400) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 72104123, 72004113).

  • Accepted Date: 2023-12-19
  • Publish Date: 2024-01-03
  • With the acceleration of global climate change and urbanization, disaster chains are always connected to artificial systems like critical infrastructure. The complexity and uncertainty of the disaster chain development process and the severity of the consequences have brought great challenges to emergency decision makers. The Bayesian network (BN) was applied in this study to reason about disaster chain scenarios to support the choice of appropriate response strategies. To capture the interacting relationships among different factors, a scenario representation model of disaster chains was developed, followed by the determination of the BN structure. In deriving the conditional probability tables of the BN model, we found that, due to the lack of data and the significant uncertainty of disaster chains, parameter learning methodologies based on data or expert knowledge alone are insufficient. By integrating both sample data and expert knowledge with the maximum entropy principle, we proposed a parameter estimation algorithm under expert prior knowledge (PEUK). Taking the rainstorm disaster chain as an example, we demonstrated the superiority of the PEUK-built BN model over the traditional maximum a posterior (MAP) algorithm and the direct expert opinion elicitation method. The results also demonstrate the potential of our BN scenario reasoning paradigm to assist real-world disaster decisions.
  • loading
  • [1]
    Alexander, D. 2013. Emergency and disaster planning. In Disaster management: International lessons in risk reduction, response and recovery, ed. A. Lopez-Carresi, M. Fordham, B. Wisner, I. Kelman, and J.C. Gaillard, 125–141. London: Routledge.
    [2]
    Balbi, S., F. Villa, V. Mojtahed, K.T. Hegetschweiler, and C. Giupponi. 2016. A spatial Bayesian network model to assess the benefits of early warning for urban flood risk to people. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences 16(6): 1323–1337.
    [3]
    Berger, A., S. Della, and V. Della. 1996. A maximum entropy approach to natural language processing. Computational Linguistics 22(1): 39–71.
    [4]
    de Campos, C., and Q. Ji. 2008. Improving Bayesian network parameter learning using constraints. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Pattern Recognition, 8–11 December 2008, Tampa, Florida, USA.
    [5]
    Chang, R., and W. Wang. 2010. Novel algorithm for Bayesian network parameter learning with informative prior constraints. In Proceedings of the 2010 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, 18–23 July 2010, Barcelona, Spain.
    [6]
    Chen, S., and C. Pollino. 2012. Good practice in Bayesian network modelling. Environmental Modelling & Software 37: 134–145.
    [7]
    Comes, T., M. Hiete, N. Wijngaards, and F. Schultmann. 2011. Decision maps: A framework for multi-criteria decision support under severe uncertainty. Decision Support Systems 52(1): 108–118.
    [8]
    Comes, T., N. Wijngaards, and B. Van de Walle. 2015. Exploring the future: Runtime scenario selection for complex and time-bound decisions. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 97: 29–46.
    [9]
    Fan, W.C., Y. Liu, W.G. Weng, and S.F. Shen. 2013. An introduction to public safety science. Beijing: Science Press (in Chinese).
    [10]
    Han, L.N., J.Q. Zhang, Y.C. Zhang, Q. Ma, S. Alu, and Q.L. Lang. 2019. Hazard assessment of earthquake disaster chains based on a Bayesian network model and ArcGIS. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 8(5): Article 210.
    [11]
    Hosseini, S., and D. Ivanov. 2020. Bayesian networks for supply chain risk, resilience and ripple effect analysis: A literature review. Expert Systems with Applications 161: Article 113649.
    [12]
    Hou, Y.Y., E.R. Zheng, W.Q. Guo, Q.K. Xiao, and Z.W. Xu. 2020. Learning Bayesian network parameters with small data set: A parameter extension under constraints method. IEEE Access 8: 24979–24989.
    [13]
    Koller, D., and N. Friedman. 2009. Probabilistic graphical models: Principles and techniques. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [14]
    Liu, Z.Q., F. Nadim, B. Vangelsten, U. Eidsvig, and B. Kalsnes. 2014. Quantitative multi-risk modelling and management using Bayesian networks. In Landslide science for a safer geoenvironment, ed. K. Sassa, P. Canuti, and Y. Yin, 773–779. Cham: Springer.
    [15]
    Liu, C., J. Qian, D.H. Guo, and Y. Liu. 2018. A spatio-temporal scenario model for emergency decision. GeoInformatica 22(2): 411–433.
    [16]
    Moehrle, S., and W. Raskob. 2015. Structuring and reusing knowledge from historical events for supporting nuclear emergency and remediation management. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 46: 303–311.
    [17]
    Niculescu, R., T. Mitchell, and R. Rao. 2006. Bayesian network learning with parameter constraints. Journal of Machine Learning Research 7: 1357–1383.
    [18]
    Qiu, J.N., Z.Q. Wang, X. Ye, L.L. Liu, and L.L. Dong. 2014. Modeling method of cascading crisis events based on merging Bayesian network. Decision Support Systems 62: 94–105.
    [19]
    Rohmer, J. 2020. Uncertainties in conditional probability tables of discrete Bayesian belief networks: A comprehensive review. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 88: Article 103384.
    [20]
    Sakahira, F., and U. Hiroi. 2021. Designing cascading disaster networks by means of natural language processing. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 66: Article 102623.
    [21]
    Shi, P.J. 1996. Theory and practice of disaster study. Journal of Natural Disasters 5(4): 6–17 (in Chinese).
    [22]
    Wu, C.G., X. Xu, B.K. Zhang, and Y.L. Na. 2013. Domain ontology for scenario-based hazard evaluation. Safety Science 60: 21–34.
    [23]
    Yu, F., B. Fan, and X.Y. Li. 2020. Improving emergency preparedness to cascading disasters: A case-driven risk ontology modelling. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management 28(3): 194–214.
    [24]
    Yu, F., B. Fan, C.S. Qin, and Y. Chen. 2023. A scenario-driven fault-control decision support model for disaster preparedness using case-based reasoning. Natural Hazards Review. https://doi.org/10.1061/NHREFO.NHENG-1722.
    [25]
    Zadeh, L.A. 1965. Fuzzy sets. Information and Control 8(3): 338–353.
    [26]
    Zhang, H., and Y. Liu. 2012. Key problems on fundamental science and technology integration in “scenario-response” based national emergency response platform system. System Engineering – Theory & Practice 32(5): 947–953 (in Chinese).
    [27]
    Zhong, S.B., Z.X. Fang, M. Zhu, and Q.Y. Huang. 2017. A geo-ontology-based approach to decision-making in emergency management of meteorological disasters. Natural Hazards 89(2): 531–554.
    [28]
    Zhou, Y., N. Fenton, and C. Zhu. 2016. An empirical study of Bayesian network parameter learning with monotonic influence constraints. Decision Support Systems 87: 69–79.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (16) PDF downloads(0) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return