Volume 14 Issue 6
Dec.  2023
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Yanqing Wang, Hong Chen, Xiao Gu. A Two-Stage Evolutionary Game Model for Collaborative Emergency Management Between Local Governments and Enterprises[J]. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2023, 14(6): 1029-1043. doi: 10.1007/s13753-023-00531-9
Citation: Yanqing Wang, Hong Chen, Xiao Gu. A Two-Stage Evolutionary Game Model for Collaborative Emergency Management Between Local Governments and Enterprises[J]. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2023, 14(6): 1029-1043. doi: 10.1007/s13753-023-00531-9

A Two-Stage Evolutionary Game Model for Collaborative Emergency Management Between Local Governments and Enterprises

doi: 10.1007/s13753-023-00531-9
Funds:

This work was supported by the Major Project of National Social Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 21&ZD166), the National Social Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 22VRC200), and the China Scholarship Council (CSC, Grant No. 202206420064).

  • Accepted Date: 2023-12-17
  • Publish Date: 2024-01-04
  • Enterprises play a vital role in emergency management, but few studies have considered the strategy choices behind such participation or the collaborative relationship with the government. This study contended that enterprises have at least three strategies regarding emergency management: non-participation, short-term participation, and long-term participation. We constructed a two-stage evolutionary game model to explore the behavioral evolution rules and evolutionary stability strategies of the government and enterprises, and employed numerical simulation to analyze how various factors influence the strategy selection of the government and enterprises. The results show that if and only if the utility value of participation is greater than 0, an enterprise will participate in emergency management. The evolutionary game then enters the second stage, during which system stability is affected by a synergistic relationship between participation cost, reputation benefit, and government subsidies, and by an incremental relationship between emergency management benefit, government subsidies, and emergency training cost. This study provides a new theoretical perspective for research on collaborative emergency management, and the results provide important references for promoting the performance of collaborative emergency management.
  • loading
  • [1]
    Ai, Y.F., and Q. Zhang. 2019. Optimization on cooperative government and enterprise supplies repertories for maritime emergency: A study case in China. Advances in Mechanical Engineering 11(5): Article 1687814019828576.
    [2]
    Ansell, C., A. Boin, and A. Keller. 2010. Managing transboundary crises: Identifying the building blocks of an effective response system. Journal of Contingencies & Crisis Management 18(4): 195–207.
    [3]
    Bennett, D. 2018. Emergency preparedness collaboration on Twitter. Journal of Emergency Management 16(3): 191–202.
    [4]
    Bosomworth, K., C. Owen, and S. Curnin. 2017. Addressing challenges for future strategic-level emergency management: Reframing, networking, and capacity-building. Disasters 41(2): 306–323.
    [5]
    Cao, X., and C.Y. Li. 2020. Evolutionary game simulation of knowledge transfer in industry-university-research cooperative network under different network scales. Scientific Reports 10(1): Article 4027.
    [6]
    Chen, Y.X., J. Zhang, P.R. Tadikamalla, and X.T. Gao. 2019a. The relationship among government, enterprise, and public in environmental governance from the perspective of multi-player evolutionary game. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 16(18): Article 3351.
    [7]
    Chen, Y.X., J. Zhang, P.R. Tadikamalla, and L. Zhou. 2019b. The mechanism of social organization participation in natural hazards emergency relief: A case study based on the social network analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 16(21): Article 4110.
    [8]
    Diehlmann, F., M. Lüettenberg, L. Verdonck, M. Wiens, A. Zienau, and F. Schultmann. 2021. Public-private collaborations in emergency logistics: A framework based on logistical and game-theoretical concepts. Safety Science 141: Article 105301.
    [9]
    Du, L.Y., and L. Qian. 2016. The government’s mobilization strategy following a disaster in the Chinese text: An evolutionary game theory analysis. Natural Hazards 80(3): 1411–1424.
    [10]
    Fan, B., Z.P. Li, and K.C. Desouza. 2022. Interagency collaboration within the city emergency management network: A case study of super ministry reform in China. Disasters 46(2): 371–400.
    [11]
    Fan, R.G., Y.B. Wang, and J.C. Lin. 2021. Study on multi-agent evolutionary game of emergency management of public health emergencies based on dynamic rewards and punishments. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18(16): Article 8278.
    [12]
    Friedman, D. 1998. On economic applications of evolutionary game theory. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 8: 15–43.
    [13]
    Gao, H.W., L. Petrosyan, H. Qiao, and A. Sedakov. 2017. Cooperation in two-stage games on undirected networks. Journal of Systems Science & Complexity 30(3): 680–693.
    [14]
    Gupta, S., S. Modgil, A. Kumar, U. Sivarajah, and Z. Irani. 2022. Artificial intelligence and cloud-based collaborative platforms for managing disaster, extreme weather and emergency operations. International Journal of Production Economics 254: Article 108642.
    [15]
    Hamann, R., L. Makaula, G. Ziervogel, C. Shearing, and A. Zhang. 2020. Strategic responses to grand challenges: Why and how corporations build community resilience. Journal of Business Ethics 161(4): 835–853.
    [16]
    Hart, P. 2013. After Fukushima: Reflections on risk and institutional learning in an era of mega-crises. Public Administration 91(1): 101–113.
    [17]
    Johnson, B.R., E. Connolly, and T.S. Carter. 2011. Corporate social responsibility: The role of fortune 100 companies in domestic and international natural disasters. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 18(6): 352–369.
    [18]
    Kapucu, N., T. Arslan, and F. Demiroz. 2010. Collaborative emergency management and national emergency management network. Disaster Prevention and Management 19(4): 452–468.
    [19]
    Kong, F., and S. Sun. 2021. Understanding the government responsibility and role of enterprises’ participation in disaster management in China. Sustainability 13(4): Article 1708.
    [20]
    Levine, D.K., and W. Pesendorfer. 2007. The evolution of cooperation through imitation. Games and Economic Behavior 58(2): 293–315.
    [21]
    Li, H.Y. 2017. Evolutionary game analysis of emergency management of the middle route of South-to-North water diversion project. Water Resources Management 31(9): 2777–2789.
    [22]
    Li, S., F. Xu, and Q.F. Yang. 2021. Research on the influence mechanism of personal initiative on enterprise emergency management ability. Frontiers in Psychology 12: Article 618034.
    [23]
    Li, C.D., F.S. Zhang, C.J. Cao, L. Yang, and T. Qu. 2019. Organizational coordination in sustainable humanitarian supply chain: An evolutionary game approach. Journal of Cleaner Production 219: 291–303.
    [24]
    Li, H.Y., X.L. Zhang, U. Khaliq, and F.U. Rehman. 2023. Emergency engineering reconstruction mode based on the perspective of professional donations. Frontiers in Psychology 14: Article 971552.
    [25]
    Linnenluecke, M.K., and B. McKnight. 2017. Community resilience to natural disasters: The role of disaster entrepreneurship. Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy 11(1): 166–185.
    [26]
    Liu, J.D., C.Q. Dong, S. An, and Y.A. Guo. 2021. Research on the natural hazard emergency cooperation behavior between governments and social organizations based on the hybrid mechanism of incentive and linkage in China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18(24): Article 13064.
    [27]
    Liu, D.H., X.Z. Xiao, H.Y. Li, and W.G. Wang. 2015. Historical evolution and benefit-cost explanation of periodical fluctuation in coal mine safety supervision: An evolutionary game analysis framework. European Journal of Operational Research 243(3): 974–984.
    [28]
    Lu, B.J., and L.L. Zhu. 2022. Public health events emergency management supervision strategy considering citizens’ and new media’s different ways of participation. Soft Computing 26(21): 11749–11769.
    [29]
    Lu, R.W., X.H. Wang, Y. Hao, and D. Li. 2018. Multiparty evolutionary game model in coal mine safety management and its application. Complexity 2018: Article 9620142.
    [30]
    Luiza, I., L.H. Matsunaga, C.C. Machado, H. Gunther, D. Hillesheim, C.E. Pimentel, J.C. Vargas, and E. D’Orsi. 2020. Psychological determinants of walking in a Brazilian sample: An application of the theory of planned behavior. Transportation Research Part F—Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 73: 391–398.
    [31]
    Luo, Y.M., Y.K. Zhang, and L. Yang. 2022. How to promote logistics enterprises to participate in reverse emergency logistics: A tripartite evolutionary game analysis. Sustainability 14(19): Article 12132.
    [32]
    Lüttenberg, M., A. Schwärzel, M. Klein, F. Diehlmann, M. Wiens, and F. Schultmann. 2022. The attitude of the population towards company engagement in public-private emergency collaborations and its risk perception: A survey. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 82: Article 103370.
    [33]
    Lv, X. 2017. Managing uncertainty in crisis: Exploring the impact of institutionalization on organizational sense-making. Berlin: Springer.
    [34]
    Nan, R., J. Wang, and W. Zhu. 2022. Market participation in vital emergent events management: Generative logic, risk spillover and counter-risk choices. Contemporary Finance & Economics 2: 28–40 (in Chinese).
    [35]
    Oh, N., A. Okada, and L. Comfort. 2014. Building collaborative emergency management systems in Northeast Asia: A comparative analysis of the roles of international agencies. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice 16(1): 94–111.
    [36]
    Olszewski, C., and L. Siebeneck. 2021. Emergency management collaboration: A review and new collaboration cycle. Journal of Emergency Management 19(1): 57–68.
    [37]
    Petrosyan, L.A., A.A. Sedakov, and A.O. Bochkarev. 2016. Two-stage network games. Automation and Remote Control 77(10): 1855–1866.
    [38]
    Puliga, G., and L. Ponta. 2021. COVID-19 firm’s fast innovation reaction analyzed through dynamic capabilities. R & D Management 52(2): 331–342.
    [39]
    Semasinghe, P., E. Hossain, and K. Zhu. 2015. An evolutionary game for distributed resource allocation in self-organizing small cells. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing 14(2): 274–287.
    [40]
    Shah, A.A., J.Z. Ye, L. Pan, R. Ullah, S.I.A. Shah, S. Fahad, and S. Naz. 2018. Schools’ flood emergency preparedness in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Province, Pakistan. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science 9(2): 181–194.
    [41]
    Shao, Z., M. Li, C. Han, L. Meng, and Q. Wu. 2022. Simulation and cooperation mechanism of construction waste disposal based on evolutionary game. Chinese Journal of Management Science. https://doi.org/10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2021.1728 (in Chinese).
    [42]
    Shi, P.J. 2012. On the role of government in integrated disaster risk governance—Based on practices in China. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science 3(3): 139–146.
    [43]
    Shi, P.Z., Y. Hao, C.L. Sun, and L.J. Zhang. 2023. Evolutionary game and simulation analysis on management synergy in China’s coal emergency coordination. Frontiers in Environmental Science 11: Article 1062770.
    [44]
    Sun, Q.Q., H. Chen, R.Y. Long, and J.H. Yang. 2023. Who will pay for the “bicycle cemetery”? Evolutionary game analysis of recycling abandoned shared bicycles under dynamic reward and punishment. European Journal of Operational Research 305(2): 917–929.
    [45]
    Tang, Y., K.R. Hong, Y.C. Zou, and Y.W. Zhang. 2021. Equilibrium resolution mechanism for multidimensional conflicts in farmland expropriation based on a multistage Van Damme’s model. Mathematics 9: Article 1208.
    [46]
    Tau, M., D. Van Niekerk, and P. Becker. 2017. An institutional model for collaborative disaster risk management in the Southern African Development Community (SADC) region. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science 7(4): 343–352.
    [47]
    Wang, Y.Q., and H. Chen. 2022. Blockchain: A potential technology to improve the performance of collaborative emergency management with multi-agent participation. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 72: Article 102867.
    [48]
    Wang, G., Y.C. Chao, Y. Cao, T.L. Jiang, W. Han, and Z.S. Chen. 2022. A comprehensive review of research works based on evolutionary game theory for sustainable energy development. Energy Reports 8: 114–136.
    [49]
    Wang, X.T., M. Hussain, S.F. Rasool, and H. Mohelska. 2023. Impact of corporate social responsibility on sustainable competitive advantages: The mediating role of corporate reputation. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-28192-7.
    [50]
    Wang, X.H., Y.F. Wu, L. Liang, and Z.M. Huang. 2014. Service outsourcing and disaster response methods in a relief supply chain. Annals of Operations Research 240(2): 471–487.
    [51]
    Wang, L., C.Y. Xia, and J. Wang. 2013. Coevolution of network structure and cooperation in the public goods game. Physica Scripta 87(5): Article 055001.
    [52]
    Wei, S.K., H. Yang, J.X. Song, K.C. Abbaspour, and Z.X. Xu. 2012. System dynamics simulation model for assessing socio-economic impacts of different levels of environmental flow allocation in the Weihe River Basin, China. European Journal of Operational Research 221: 248–262.
    [53]
    Xie, K.F., S.F. Zhu, and P. Gui. 2022. A game-theoretic approach for CSR emergency medical supply chain during COVID-19 crisis. Sustainability 14(3): Article 1315.
    [54]
    Xiong, L., and R.D. Xue. 2023. Evolutionary game analysis of collaborative transportation of emergency materials based on blockchain. International Journal of Logistics-Research and Application. https://doi.org/10.1080/13675567.2023.2173160.
    [55]
    Yang, A.H., and W. Zhang. 2018. Company orientation and community orientation: Understanding two different modes of enterprise in disaster governance. Journal of Risk, Disaster & Crisis Research 2: 167–192 (in Chinese).
    [56]
    Zhang, L. 2021. Research on emergency management guarantee for enterprises to participate in major public emergencies. Journal of Inner Mongolia University of Finance and Economics 19(6): 120–123 (in Chinese).
    [57]
    Zhang, M., and Z.J. Kong. 2022. A tripartite evolutionary game model of emergency supplies joint reserve among the government, enterprise and society. Computers & Industrial Engineering 169: Article 108132.
    [58]
    Zhang, H.B., and X. Tong. 2015. Changes in the structure of emergency management in China and a theoretical generalization. Social Science in China 3(58–84): 206 (in Chinese).
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (13) PDF downloads(0) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return