Factors Impacting Participatory Post-Disaster Relocation and Housing Reconstruction: The Case of Tsholotsho District, Zimbabwe

Nombulelo Kitsepile Ngulube; Hirokazu Tatano; Subhajyoti Samaddar

doi:10.1007/s13753-024-00536-y

Volume 15 Issue 1

Feb. 2024

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > International Journal of Disaster Risk Science > 2024 > 15(1): 58-72

Nombulelo Kitsepile Ngulube, Hirokazu Tatano, Subhajyoti Samaddar. Factors Impacting Participatory Post-Disaster Relocation and Housing Reconstruction: The Case of Tsholotsho District, Zimbabwe[J]. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2024, 15(1): 58-72. doi: 10.1007/s13753-024-00536-y

Citation:

Nombulelo Kitsepile Ngulube, Hirokazu Tatano, Subhajyoti Samaddar. Factors Impacting Participatory Post-Disaster Relocation and Housing Reconstruction: The Case of Tsholotsho District, Zimbabwe[J]. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2024, 15(1): 58-72. doi: 10.1007/s13753-024-00536-y

Citation:

Nombulelo Kitsepile Ngulube, Hirokazu Tatano, Subhajyoti Samaddar. Factors Impacting Participatory Post-Disaster Relocation and Housing Reconstruction: The Case of Tsholotsho District, Zimbabwe[J]. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2024, 15(1): 58-72. doi: 10.1007/s13753-024-00536-y

PDF

Factors Impacting Participatory Post-Disaster Relocation and Housing Reconstruction: The Case of Tsholotsho District, Zimbabwe

doi: 10.1007/s13753-024-00536-y

1. Department of Social Informatics, Graduate School of Informatics, Kyoto University, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan;
2. Disaster Prevention Research Institute (DPRI), Kyoto University, Kyoto, 611-0011, Japan

Accepted Date: 2024-01-05

Available Online: 2024-03-14

Publish Date: 2024-02-19

Abstract

Abstract

Relocation is not typically considered the best planning option for post-disaster reconstruction and rehabilitation, but it may be necessary if the site has suffered severe damage or is at imminent risk. There is a growing recognition that strong community participation is necessary in the post-disaster relocation decision-making process since relocation can have detrimental effects on a community’s livelihood, cultural system, and way of life, among others. However, the realization of this still needs to be improved. As of yet, few studies have examined a comprehensive account of meaningful community engagement in post-disaster relocation and reconstruction, particularly in developing countries. This study investigated what factors influenced local communities’ participation in post-disaster relocation and reconstruction works after the 2017 Cyclone Dineo flood disaster in the Tsholotsho District of Zimbabwe. Qualitative research methods such as face-to-face interviews, observations, and focus groups were used to collect qualitative data from a purposive sample of 25 community members and 6 stakeholders. This empirical investigation showed that despite the fact that the relocation project was conceived as a community-centered project, there was no meaningful community engagement, due to the absence of a participatory framework or planning guidelines for stakeholder engagement, as well as the lack of political willingness among government officials. The study concluded that the lack of community involvement led to local communities abandoning the reconstruction sites because relocation projects failed to accommodate the cultural beliefs, place attachments, and livelihood concerns of local communities. This study suggested that it is imperative to enhance the awareness of government officials and other stakeholders about the importance of community participation for the effective implementation of post-disaster relocation works. Meaningful community participation can also provide avenues for incorporating local needs and concerns, cultural beliefs, and alternative and sustainable livelihood restoration, which are essential for effective reconstruction after disasters. This research aimed to enrich the academic discourse by providing valuable insights into the intricacies of post-disaster recovery initiatives in the country.
- Community rehabilitation,
- Housing reconstruction,
- Participatory relocation,
- Zimbabwe

FullText(HTML)

References(54)

References

[1]	Arnstein, S.R. 1969. A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Planning Association 35(4): 216–224.
[2]	Boano, C., and M. García. 2011. Lost in translation? The challenges of an equitable post-disaster reconstruction process: Lessons from Chile. Environmental Hazards 10(3): 293–309.
[3]	Buckle, P., G. Marsh, and S. Smale. 2002. Reframing risk, hazards, disasters and daily life. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters 20(3): 309–324.
[4]	Chaminuka, N., and E. Dube. 2017. Urban agriculture as a food security strategy for urban dwellers: A case study of Mkoba residents in the city of Gweru, Zimbabwe. PEOPLE: International Journal of Social Sciences 3(2): 26–45.
[5]	Chandrasekhar, D. 2012. Digging deeper: Participation and non-participation in post-disaster community recovery. Community Development 43(5): 614–629.
[6]	Chikoto, G.L., S. Sadiq, and A. Akeem. 2012. Zimbabwe’s emergency management system: A promising development. In Comparative emergency management: Understanding disaster policies, organizations, and initiatives from around the world, ed. D.A. McEntire, 1–20. Washington, DC: FEMA.
[7]	Chronicle. 2017. Relocation of Tsholotsho flood victims starts. Chronicle, 15 June 2017. www.chronicle.co.zw/relocation-of-tsholotsho-flood-victims-starts/. Accessed 12 Oct 2022.
[8]	Davidson, C.H., C. Johnson, G. Lizarralde, N. Dikmen, and A. Sliwinski. 2007. Truths and myths about community participation in post-disaster housing projects. Habitat International 31(1): 100–115.
[9]	Dube, E., O. Mtapuri, and J. Matunhu. 2018. Managing flood disasters on the built environment in the rural communities of Zimbabwe: Lessons learnt. Jamba: Journal of Disaster Risk Studies 10(1): Article 542.
[10]	Dube, E., G. Wedawatta, and K. Ginige. 2021. Building-back-better in post-disaster recovery: Lessons learnt from Cyclone Idai-induced floods in Zimbabwe. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science 12(5): 700–712.
[11]	Ganapati, N.E., and S. Ganapati. 2008. Enabling participatory planning after disasters. Journal of the American Planning Association 75(1): 41–59.
[12]	Guo, Y. 2012. Urban resilience in post-disaster reconstruction: Towards a resilient development in Sichuan, China. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science 3(1): 45–55.
[13]	Gusha, I. 2019. Memories of Gukurahundi massacre and the challenge of reconciliation. Studia Historiae Ecclesiasticae 45(1): 1–14.
[14]	Hamideh, S. 2020. Opportunities and challenges of public participation in post-disaster recovery planning: Lessons from Galveston, TX. Natural Hazards Review. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.00003.
[15]	Hamideh, S., and J. Rongerude. 2019. Social vulnerability and participation in disaster recovery decisions: Public housing in Galveston after Hurricane Ike. Natural Hazards 93(5): 1629–1648.
[16]	Ichsan, I. 2011. Community participation in post-tsunami redevelopment in ACEH: The process and community members' perceptions and preferences. Graduate theses and dissertations retrieved from https://scholarworks.uark.edu/etd/190. Accessed 18 Sept 2023.
[17]	IFRC (International Federation of Red Cross). 2017. Emergency Plan of Action Final Report Zimbabwe : Floods. https://reliefweb.int/report/zimbabwe/zimbabwe-floods-emergency-plan-action-final-report-dref-operation-mdrzw012. Accessed 2 Oct 2022.
[18]	Imperiale, A.J., and F. Vanclay. 2020. Top-down reconstruction and the failure to “build back better” resilient communities after disaster: Lessons from the 2009 L’Aquila Italy Earthquake. Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal 29(4): 541–555.
[19]	Iuchi, K., and J. Mutter. 2020. Governing community relocation after major disasters: An analysis of three different approaches and its outcomes in Asia. Progress in Disaster Science 6: Article 100071.
[20]	Jha, A.K., J.D. Barenstein, P.M. Phelps, D. Pittet, and S. Sena. 2010. Safer homes, stronger communities: A handbook for reconstructing after natural disasters. Washington, DC: World Bank. http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/WDSContentServer/WDSP/IB/2010/01/27/000334955_20100127044847/Rendered/PDF/528390PUB0safe101Official0Use0Only1.pdf. Accessed 18 Sept 2023.
[21]	Kitagawa, K., and S. Samaddar. 2022. Widening participation in community-based disaster risk reduction and climate change adaptation in Japan. UCL Open: Environment Preprint.
[22]	Lyons, M. 2009. Building back better: The large-scale impact of small-scale approaches to reconstruction. World Development 37(2): 385–398.
[23]	Madushani, S., J. Upeshika, and E.M.K.S. Ekanayaka. 2019. An evaluation of success and failures in disaster induced resettlement program: A case study of resettlement sites in Galle. In Proceedings of 10th Annual Research Symposium-2019, Colombo, Sri Lanka, December 2019.
[24]	Maly, E. 2017. Rethinking “build back better” in housing reconstruction: A proposal for “people-centred housing recovery”. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 56. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/56/1/012025.
[25]	Mannakkara, S., S. Wilkinson, and R. Potangaroa. 2018. Resilient post disaster recovery through building back better. New York: Routledge.
[26]	Mavhura, E. 2016. Disaster legislation: A critical review of the Civil Protection Act of Zimbabwe. Natural Hazards 80(1): 605–621.
[27]	Méheux, K., D. Dominey-Howes, and K. Lloyd. 2010. Operational challenges to community participation in post-disaster damage assessments: Observations from Fiji. Disasters 34(4): 1102–1122.
[28]	Ngulube, N.K., H. Tatano, and S. Samaddar. 2023. Community insights: Citizen participation in Kamaishi Unosumai decade-long recovery from the Great East Japan Earthquake. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science 14(6): 886–897.
[29]	Nyoni, C., B.B. Muzembi, M. Mhlanga, D. Mureriwa, F. Jaji, and M. Muzire. 2019. Tsholotsho flood survivors: Three years after the disaster caused by Cyclone Dineo. The Fountain – Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies 33(1): 30–44.
[30]	Omidvar, B., H. Zafari, and M. Khakpour. 2011. Evaluation of public participation in reconstruction of Bam, Iran, after the 2003 Earthquake. Natural Hazards 59(3): 1397–1412.
[31]	Ophiyandri, T., R. Amaratunga, and C. Pathirage. 2010. Community based post disaster housing reconstruction: Indonesian perspective. In Proceeding of CIB World Congress 2010, 10–13 May 2010, Salford, UK.
[32]	Ophiyandri, T., D. Amaratunga, C. Pathirage, and K. Keraminiyage. 2015. Critical success factors for community-based post-disaster housing reconstruction projects in the pre-construction stage in Indonesia. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment 6(1): 102–116.
[33]	Palagi, S., and A. Javernick-Will. 2020. Discrepancies between postdisaster relocation policy and implementation in the Philippines. Journal of Management in Engineering 36(4): 1–29.
[34]	Relief Web. 2017. Cyclone Dineo pounds Zimbabwe's southern regions. Report. https://reliefweb.int/report/zimbabwe/cyclone-dineo-pounds-zimbabwes-southern-regions. Accessed 12 Dec 2022.
[35]	Roosli, R., J. Nordin, and G. O’Brien. 2018. The evaluation of community participation in post-disaster housing reconstruction projects in Malaysia. Procedia Engineering 212: 667–674.
[36]	Ruwanpura, K.N. 2009. Putting houses in place: Rebuilding communities in post-tsunami Sri Lanka. Disasters 33(3): 436–456.
[37]	Sadiqi, Z., V. Coffey, and B. Trigunarsyah. 2011. Post-disaster housing reconstruction: Challenges for effective community participation. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Building Resilience (ICBR 2011), 20–22 July 2011, Sri Lanka.
[38]	Sadiqi, Z., V. Coffey, and B. Trigunarsyah. 2012. Rebuilding housing after a disaster: Factors for failure. In Proceedings of 8th Annual International Conference of the International Institute for Infrastructure, Renewal and Reconstruction (IIIRR), 24–26 August 2012, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan, 292–300.
[39]	Sadiqi, Z., B. Trigunarsyah, and V. Coffey. 2016. A framework for community participation in post-disaster housing reconstruction projects: A case of Afghanistan. International Journal of Project Management 35(5): 900–912.
[40]	Samaddar, S., and N. Okada. 2006. Participatory approach for post-earthquake reconstruction in the villages of Kachh, Gujarat, India. Annuals of Disaster Prevention Research Institute, Kyoto University, No. 49B: 197–205.
[41]	Samaddar, S., N. Okada, J. Choi, and H. Tatano. 2017. What constitutes successful participatory disaster risk management? Insights from post-earthquake reconstruction work in rural Gujarat, India. Natural Hazards 85(1): 111–138.
[42]	Samaddar, S., H. Si, X. Jiang, J. Choi, and H. Tatano. 2022. How participatory is participatory flood risk mapping? Voices from the flood prone Dharavi slum in Mumbai. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science 13(2): 230–248.
[43]	Samaddar, S., M. Yokomatsu, F. Dayour, M. Oteng-Ababio, T. Dzivenu, M. Adams, and H. Ishikawa. 2015. Evaluating effective public participation in disaster management and climate change adaptation: Insights from Northern Ghana through a user-based approach. Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy 6(1): 117–143.
[44]	Sangasumana, P. 2018. Post disaster relocation issues: A case study of Samasarakanda Landslide in Sri Lanka. European Scientific Journal 14(32): Article 1.
[45]	Scheub, H. ca 1967–1968. Ndebele Zimbabwe homestead. https://search.library.wisc.edu/digital/AFNKVKOPLZQARX84. Accessed 13 Oct 2022.
[46]	Shafique, K. 2016. Success of post-natural disaster reconstruuction projects: Significance of community perspective. International Journal of Business Management 11(9): Article 69.
[47]	Shafique, K., and C.M.J. Warren. 2018. Empowerment and legitimization of effected communities in post-disaster reconstruction. Procedia Engineering 212: 1171–1178.
[48]	Sherry, J., A. Curtis, E. Mendham, and E. Toman. 2018. Cultural landscapes at risk: Exploring the meaning of place in a sacred valley of Nepal. Global Environmental Change 52: 190–200.
[49]	Steinberg, F. 2007. Housing reconstruction and rehabilitation in Aceh and Nias, Indonesia—Rebuilding lives. Habitat International 31(1): 100–115.
[50]	Thurairajah, N. 2008. Post disaster reconstruction as an opportunity for development: Women’s perspective. In Proceedings of CIB W89 International Conference on Building Education and Research (BEAR), 11–15 February 2008, Sri Lanka. http://eprints.hud.ac.uk/id/eprint/22603/. Accessed 12 Sept 2023.
[51]	Trigunarsyah, B., Z. Sadiqi, and V. Coffey. 2015. Community participation in post-disaster reconstruction. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers – Municipal Engineer, 169(3): 173–186.
[52]	Ward, J., J.S Becker, and D. Johnston. 2008. Community participation in recovery planning: A case study from the 1998 Ohura Flood. GNS Science Report 2008. Auckland, New Zealand: GNS Science.
[53]	Xu, D., L. Peng, S. Liu, C. Su, and X. Wang. 2017. Influences of sense of place on farming households’ relocation willingness in areas threatened by geological disasters: Evidence from China. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science 8(1): 16–32.
[54]	Zaman, M. 2002. Relocation and development in Indonesia. Journal of Contemporary Asia 32(2): 255–266.