The Role of the Spatial Network in Urban Disaster Risk Variations: Reimagining the Notion of Spatial Vulnerability at the Urban Scale

Monia Del Pinto; Ksenia Chmutina; Falli Palaiologou; Lee Bosher

doi:10.1007/s13753-024-00554-w

Volume 15 Issue 3

Jun. 2024

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > International Journal of Disaster Risk Science > 2024 > 15(3): 303-316

Monia Del Pinto, Ksenia Chmutina, Falli Palaiologou, Lee Bosher. The Role of the Spatial Network in Urban Disaster Risk Variations: Reimagining the Notion of Spatial Vulnerability at the Urban Scale[J]. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2024, 15(3): 303-316. doi: 10.1007/s13753-024-00554-w

Citation:

Monia Del Pinto, Ksenia Chmutina, Falli Palaiologou, Lee Bosher. The Role of the Spatial Network in Urban Disaster Risk Variations: Reimagining the Notion of Spatial Vulnerability at the Urban Scale[J]. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2024, 15(3): 303-316. doi: 10.1007/s13753-024-00554-w

Citation:

Monia Del Pinto, Ksenia Chmutina, Falli Palaiologou, Lee Bosher. The Role of the Spatial Network in Urban Disaster Risk Variations: Reimagining the Notion of Spatial Vulnerability at the Urban Scale[J]. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2024, 15(3): 303-316. doi: 10.1007/s13753-024-00554-w

PDF

The Role of the Spatial Network in Urban Disaster Risk Variations: Reimagining the Notion of Spatial Vulnerability at the Urban Scale

doi: 10.1007/s13753-024-00554-w

1. School of Architecture, Building and Civil Engineering, Loughborough University, Loughborough, LE11 3TU, UK;
2. School of Business, University of Leicester, Leicester, LE1 7RH, UK

Accepted Date: 2024-03-30

Available Online: 2024-10-26

Publish Date: 2024-04-16

Abstract

Abstract

The notion of “spatial vulnerability” is present in most disaster studies with a strong geographical connotation and accordingly is adopted at all scales, including the urban. While enabling mapping and visualizing risk patterns at macroscales, this geocentric foundation fails to capture disaster risk dynamics associated with the urban spatial network—an element that plays a significant role in the everyday and emergency functioning of cities, enabling users’ movement and interaction. Yet, urban vulnerability assessment overlooks this aspect and thus leaves urban disaster risk mechanisms partially unexplored. This study investigated the role of the network of urban public open spaces (UPOS) in the creation and progression of urban disaster risk in earthquake-prone settlements. Through a multimethod approach that integrates quantitative and qualitative methods and explores spatial configuration, planning policies, and practices of use of UPOS in everyday and emergency scenarios, our study demonstrated that UPOS configuration plays an active role in urban disaster risk. Urban public open spaces impact risk by influencing the exposure of pedestrians and their capacity for self-protection. The study further reconceptualized spatial vulnerability at the urban scale, as the fraction of vulnerability associated to the spatial network, highlighting the interplay of planning policies and spatial practices in its production and progression. Our findings make the notion of spatial vulnerability less ambiguous at the urban scale, by viewing the variable as an imbalance in capacities and exposure that generates spatially unsafe conditions. This refined conceptualization of spatial vulnerability becomes a lens for a more granular approach to urban disaster risk reduction and city planning by identifying and integrating sociospatial considerations.
- Central Italy Earthquakes,
- Pedestrian evacuation,
- Space syntax,
- Spatial vulnerability,
- Urban disaster risk

FullText(HTML)

References(77)

References

[1]	Albris, K., K.C. Lauta, and E. Raju. 2020. Disaster knowledge gaps: Exploring the interface between science and policy for disaster risk reduction in Europe. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science 11(1): 1-12.
[2]	Aubrecht, C., S. Freire, C. Neuhold, A. Curtis, and K. Steinnocher. 2012. Introducing a temporal component in spatial vulnerability analysis. Disaster Advances 5(2): 48-54.
[3]	Bergmann, L. 2016. Toward speculative data: “Geographic information” for situated knowledges, vibrant matter, and relational spaces. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 34(6): 971-989.
[4]	Bevacqua, A., D.L. Yu, and Y.J. Zhang. 2018. Coastal vulnerability: Evolving concepts in understanding vulnerable people and places. Environmental Science & Policy 82: 19-29.
[5]	Blaikie, P., B. Wisner, T. Cannon, and I. Davis. 1994. At risk: Natural hazards, people’s vulnerability, and disasters. London: Routledge.
[6]	Boeing, G. 2017. OSMnx: New methods for acquiring, constructing, analyzing, and visualizing complex street networks. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 65: 126-139.
[7]	Bohle, H.G. 2001. Vulnerability and criticality: Perspectives from social geography. Update IHDP: Newsletter of the International Human Dimensions Programme on Global Environmental Change 2(1): 1-7.
[8]	Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 53(9): 1689-1699.
[9]	Braun, V., V. Clarke, N. Hayfield, and G. Terry. 2012. Thematic analysis. In Handbook of research methods in health social sciences, ed. P. Liamputtong, 843-860. Singapore: Springer.
[10]	Buckhardt, L., J. Fezer, and M. Schmitz. 2019. Who plans the planning? Architecture, politics, and mankind. Basel, Switzerland: Birkhäuser.
[11]	Carnelli, F., and I. Frigerio. 2017. A socio-spatial vulnerability assessment for disaster management: Insights from the 2012 Emilia earthquake (Italy). Sociologia Urbana e Rurale. https://doi.org/10.3280/SUR2016-111002.
[12]	Contreras, D., T. Blaschke, and M.E. Hodgson. 2017. Lack of spatial resilience in a recovery process: Case L’Aquila, Italy. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 121: 76-88.
[13]	Contreras, D., T. Blaschke, S. Kienberger, and P. Zeil. 2011. Spatial vulnerability indicators: “Measuring” recovery processes after earthquakes. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management: From Early-Warning Systems to Preparedness and Training, ISCRAM 2011, 8-11 May 2011, Lisbon, Portugal, 1-5.
[14]	Cutini, V. 2013. The city, when it trembles: Earthquake destructions, post-earthquake reconstructions and grid configuration. In Proceedings of the 9th International Space Syntax Symposium, 31 October-3 November 2013, Seoul, South Korea, 5-17.
[15]	Cutter, S.L., and W.D. Solecki. 1989. The national pattern of ariborne toxic releases. The Professional Geographer 41(2): 149-161.
[16]	Cutter, S.L., J.T. Mitchell, and M.S. Scott. 2000. Revealing the vulnerability of people and places: A case study of Georgetown County, South Carolina. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 90(4): 713-737.
[17]	Danermark, B. 2019. Applied interdisciplinary research: A critical realist perspective. Journal of Critical Realism 18(4): 368-382.
[18]	De Sherbinin, A. 2014. Spatial climate change vulnerability assessment: A review of data, methods, and issues. Climatelinks, 1 August 2014.
[19]	Del Pinto, M., G. Palaiologou, K. Chmutina, and L. Bosher. 2021. Urban morphology in support of disaster risk reduction: Towards theory and methods for a spatial approach to tackling urban vulnerability to earthquakes. In Proceedings of the XXVIII International Seminar on Urban Form ISUF2021: Urban Form and the Sustainable and Prosperous Cities, 29 June-3 July 2021, Glasgow, UK, 354-362.
[20]	Edwards-Jones, A. 2014. Qualitative data analysis with NVIVO. Journal of Education for Teaching 40(2): 193-195.
[21]	Fabian, J. 2014. Time and the other: How anthropology makes its objects. New York: Columbia University Press.
[22]	Fang, C.L., Y. Wang, and J.W. Fang. 2016. A comprehensive assessment of urban vulnerability and its spatial differentiation in China. Journal of Geographical Sciences 26(2): 153-170.
[23]	Fekete, A. 2012. Spatial disaster vulnerability and risk assessments: Challenges in their quality and acceptance. Natural Hazards 61(3): 1161-1178.
[24]	Frigerio, I., and M. De Amicis. 2016. Mapping social vulnerability to natural hazards in Italy: A suitable tool for risk mitigation strategies. Environmental Science & Policy 63: 187-196.
[25]	Frigerio, I., S. Ventura, D. Strigaro, M. Mattavelli, M. De Amicis, S. Mugnano, and M. Boffi. 2016. A GIS-based approach to identify the spatial variability of social vulnerability to seismic hazard in Italy. Applied Geography 74: 12-22.
[26]	Gaillard, J.C., J.R.D. Cadag, and M.M.F. Rampengan. 2019. People’s capacities in facing hazards and disasters: An overview. Natural Hazards 95(3): 863-876.
[27]	Gauthier, P., and J. Gilliland. 2005. Mapping urban morphology: A classification scheme for interpreting contributions to the study of urban form. Urban Morphology 10(1): 41-50.
[28]	Giuliani, F., A. De Falco, and V. Cutini. 2020. The role of urban configuration during disasters. A scenario-based methodology for the post-earthquake emergency management of Italian historic centres. Safety Science 127: Article 104700.
[29]	Gold, J.R. 1998. Creating the charter of Athens: CIAM and the functional city, 1933-43. Town Planning Review 69(3): Article 225.
[30]	Griffiths, S. 2012. The use of space syntax in historical research: Current practice and future possibilities. In Proceedings of the 8th International Space Syntax Symposium, 3-6 January 2012, Santiago, Chile, 1-26.
[31]	Harvey, D. 1988. Social justice and the city. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.
[32]	Harvey, D. 2017. Between space and time: Reflections on the geographical imagination. In New critical writings in political sociology: Volume one: Power, state and inequality, ed. K. Nash, 519-535. London: Routledge.
[33]	Heesen, J., D.F. Lorenz, M. Nagenborg, B. Wenzel, and M. Voss. 2014. Blind spots on Achilles’ heel: The limitations of vulnerability and resilience mapping in research. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science 5(1): 74-85.
[34]	Hewitt, K., and I. Burton. 1971. The hazardousness of a place: A regional ecology of damaging events. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.
[35]	Hewitt, K. 1997. Regions of risk: A geographical introduction to disasters. London: Longman.
[36]	Hillier, B. 1986. City of Alice’s dreams. Architects’ Journal 9: 39-41.
[37]	Hillier, B. 1989. The architecture of the urban object. Ekistics 56(334-335): 5-21.
[38]	Hillier, B. 1996. Cities as movement economies. Urban Design International 1(1): 41-60.
[39]	Hillier, B. 2005. The art of place and the science of space. World Architecture 185(11): 96-102.
[40]	Hillier, B. 2006. The golden age for cities? How we design cities is how we understand them. Urban Design 100: 1990-1992.
[41]	Hillier, B. 2008. Space and spatiality: What the built environment needs from social theory. Building Research & Information 36(3): 216-230.
[42]	Hillier, B., and J. Hanson. 1984. The social logic of space. Landscape and Urban Planning 13: 247-249.
[43]	Hillier, B., and L. Vaughan. 2007. The city as one thing. Progress in Planning 67: 205-230.
[44]	Hillier, B., A. Penn, J. Hanson, T. Grajewski, and J. Xu. 1993. Natural movement: Or, configuration and attraction in urban pedestrian movement. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 20(1): 29-66.
[45]	Hu, X.B., H. Li, X. Guo, P.H.A.J.M. van Gelder, and P. Shi. 2019. Spatial vulnerability of network systems under spatially local hazards. Risk Analysis 39(1): 162-179.
[46]	Krenz, K. 2017. Employing volunteered geographic information in space syntax analysis. In Proceedings of the 11th International Space Syntax Symposium, 3-7 July 2017, Lisbon, Portugal, 1-26.
[47]	Lees, L. 2002. Rematerializing geography: The “new” urban geography. Progress in Human Geography 26(1): 101-112.
[48]	Lefebvre, H. 1991. The production of space. London: Blackwell Publishing.
[49]	Li, Y.F., X.X. Zhang, X.X. Zhao, S.Q. Ma, H.H. Cao, and J.K. Cao. 2016. Assessing spatial vulnerability from rapid urbanization to inform coastal urban regional planning. Ocean and Coastal Management 123: 53-65.
[50]	Lynch, K. 1959. The image of the city. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
[51]	Marin Maureira, V., and K. Karimi. 2017. The everyday and the post-disaster urban systems as one thing. In Proceedings of the 11th International Space Syntax Symposium, 3-7 July 2017, Lisbon, Portugal, 1-17.
[52]	Massey, D. 2005. For space. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
[53]	Mumford, E. 2019. CIAM and its outcomes. Urban. Planning 4(3): 291-298.
[54]	Næss, P. 2015. Critical realism, urban planning and urban research. European Planning Studies 23(6): 1228-1244.
[55]	Palaiologou, G., T. Larimian, and L. Vaughan. 2021. The use of morphological description in neighbourhood planning: Form-based assessment of physical character and design rules. Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability 14(4): 490-514.
[56]	Pezzica, C., C. Valerio, and C.B.D. Souza. 2019. Rapid configurational analysis using OSM data: Towards the use of space syntax to orient post-disaster decision making. In Proceedings of the 12th International Space Syntax Symposium, 8-13 July 2019, Beijing, China.
[57]	Piccinato, G. 2010. Centenary paper: A brief history of Italian town planning after 1945. Town Planning Review 81(3): 237-259.
[58]	Psarra, S. 2014. Beyond analytical knowledge: The need for a combined theory of generation and explanation. A/Z ITU Journal of the Faculty of Architecture 11(2): 47-68.
[59]	Psarra, S. 2018. The Venice variations: Tracing the architectural imagination. London: UCL Press.
[60]	Raduszynski, T., and M. Numada. 2023. Measure and spatial identification of social vulnerability, exposure and risk to natural hazards in Japan using open data. Scientific Reports 13(1): Article 664.
[61]	Rashed, T., and J. Weeks. 2003. Assessing vulnerability to earthquake hazards through spatial multicriteria analysis of urban areas. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 17(6): 547-576.
[62]	Roy, D.C., and T. Blasche. 2015. Spatial vulnerability assessment of floods in the coastal regions of Bangladesh. Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk 6(1): 21-44.
[63]	Saatcioglu, B., and C. Corus. 2016. Exploring spatial vulnerability: Inequality and agency formulations in social space. Journal of Marketing Management 32(3-4): 230-251.
[64]	Simonsen, K. 1996. Social theory. Progress in Human Geography 20(4): 494-512.
[65]	Simpson, D.M., and R.J. Human. 2008. Large-scale vulnerability assessments for natural hazards. Natural Hazards 47(2): 143-155.
[66]	Smirnov, O.A. 2016. Geographic space: An ancient story retold. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 41(4): 585-596.
[67]	Sritart, H., H. Miyazaki, S. Kanbara, and T. Hara. 2020. Methodology and application of spatial vulnerability assessment for evacuation shelters in disaster planning. Sustainability 12(18): Article 7355.
[68]	Thrift, N. 2006. Space. Theory, Culture & Society 23(2-3): 139-146.
[69]	Turner, A. 2001. Angular analysis. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Space Syntax, 7-11 May 2001, Atlanta, USA.
[70]	Turner, A. 2007. From axial to road-centre lines: A new representation for space syntax and a new model of route choice for transport network analysis. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science 34(3): 539-555.
[71]	Turner, A., M. Doxa, D. O’Sullivan, and A. Penn. 2001. From isovists to visibility graphs: A methodology for the analysis of architectural space. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 28(1): 103-121.
[72]	Vaughan, L., and I. Geddes. 2009. Urban form and deprivation: A contemporary proxy for Charles Booth’ s analysis of poverty. Radical Statistics 99: 46-73.
[73]	Vaughan, L., D.L.C. Clark, O. Sahbaz, and M.M. Haklay. 2005. Space and exclusion: Does urban morphology play a part in social deprivation?. Area 37(4): 402-412.
[74]	Watts, M.J., and H.G. Bohle. 1993. The space of vulnerability: The causal structure of hunger and famine. Progress in Human Geography 17(1): 43-67.
[75]	Wisner, B. 1995. Bridging “expert” and “local” knowledge for counter-disaster planning in urban South Africa. GeoJournal 37(3): 335-348.
[76]	Wisner, B., J.C. Gaillard, and I. Kelman. 2011. Framing disaster: Theories and stories seeking to understand hazards, vulnerability and risk. In Disaster prevention, ed. I. Kelman, 15-30. London: Routledge.
[77]	Yin, R. 2014. Case study research design and methods, 5th edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.