Volume 15 Issue 5
Oct.  2024
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Jiarui Yang, Kai Liu, Ming Wang, Gang Zhao, Wei Wu, Qingrui Yue. A Convolutional Neural Network-Weighted Cellular Automaton Model for the Fast Prediction of Urban Pluvial Flooding Processes[J]. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2024, 15(5): 754-768. doi: 10.1007/s13753-024-00592-4
Citation: Jiarui Yang, Kai Liu, Ming Wang, Gang Zhao, Wei Wu, Qingrui Yue. A Convolutional Neural Network-Weighted Cellular Automaton Model for the Fast Prediction of Urban Pluvial Flooding Processes[J]. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2024, 15(5): 754-768. doi: 10.1007/s13753-024-00592-4

A Convolutional Neural Network-Weighted Cellular Automaton Model for the Fast Prediction of Urban Pluvial Flooding Processes

doi: 10.1007/s13753-024-00592-4
Funds:

This research was supported by the General Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 42377467).

  • Accepted Date: 2024-10-10
  • Available Online: 2024-12-07
  • Publish Date: 2024-11-01
  • Deep learning models demonstrate impressive performance in rapidly predicting urban floods, but there are still limitations in enhancing physical connectivity and interpretability. This study proposed an innovative modeling approach that integrates convolutional neural networks with weighted cellular automaton (CNN-WCA) to achieve the precise and rapid prediction of urban pluvial flooding processes and enhance the physical connectivity and reliability of modeling results. The study began by generating a rainfall-inundation dataset using WCA and LISFLOOD-FP, and the CNN-WCA model was trained using outputs from LISFLOOD-FP and WCA. Subsequently, the pre-trained model was applied to simulate the flood caused by the 20 July 2021 rainstorm in Zhengzhou City. The predicted inundation spatial distribution and depth by CNN-WCA closely aligned with those of LISFLOOD-FP, with the mean absolute error concentrated within 5 mm, and the prediction time of CNN-WCA was only 0.8% that of LISFLOOD-FP. The CNN-WCA model displays a strong capacity for accurately predicting changes in inundation depths within the study area and at susceptible points for urban flooding, with the Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency values of most flood-prone points exceeding 0.97. Furthermore, the physical connectivity of the inundation distribution predicted by CNN-WCA is better than that of the distribution obtained with a CNN. The CNN-WCA model with additional physical constraints exhibits a reduction of around 34% in instances of physical discontinuity compared to CNN. Our results prove that the CNN model with multiple physical constraints has significant potential to rapidly and accurately simulate urban flooding processes and improve the reliability of prediction.
  • loading
  • [1]
    Aldridge, T., O. Gunawan, R.J. Moore, S.J. Cole, and D. Price. 2016. A surface water flooding impact library for flood risk assessment. In Proceedings of the 3rd European Conference on Flood Risk Management (FLOODrisk 2016), 17-21 October 2016, Lyon, France.
    [2]
    Bates, P.D., M.S. Horritt, and T.J. Fewtrell. 2010. A simple inertial formulation of the shallow water equations for efficient two-dimensional flood inundation modelling. Journal of Hydrology 387(1-2): 33-45.
    [3]
    Beijing Institute of Municipal Engineering Design and Research. 2004. Water supply and drainage design manual, 2nd edn. Beijing: China Architecture and Building Publisher (in Chinese).
    [4]
    Cea, L., M. Garrido, and J. Puertas. 2010. Experimental validation of two-dimensional depth-averaged models for forecasting rainfall-runoff from precipitation data in urban areas. Journal of Hydrology 382(1-4): 88-102.
    [5]
    Changnon, S.A., and N.E. Westcott. 2007. Heavy rainstorms in Chicago: INCREASING frequency, altered impacts, and future implications. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association 38(5): 1467-1475.
    [6]
    Couclelis, H. 1985. Cellular worlds: A framework for modeling micro-macro dynamics. Environment and Planning A 17(5): 585-596.
    [7]
    Disaster Investigation Group of the State Council of China. 2022. Investigation report of the “7-20” extreme rainstorm disaster in Zhengzhou City, Henan (in Chinese).
    [8]
    Donnelly, J., A. Daneshkhah, and S. Abolfathi. 2024. Physics-informed neural networks as surrogate models of hydrodynamic simulators. Science of the Total Environment 912: 168814.
    [9]
    Dottori, F., and E. Todini. 2010. A 2D flood inundation model based on cellular automata approach. In Proceeedings of the XVIII International Conference on Computational Methods in Water Resources, 21-24 June 2010, Barcelona, Spain.
    [10]
    Farsal, W., S. Anter, and M. Ramdani. 2018. Deep learning. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Intelligent Systems: Theories and Applications, 24-25 October 2018, New York, USA.
    [11]
    Fraehr, N., Q.J. Wang, W. Wu, and R. Nathan. 2023. Supercharging hydrodynamic inundation models for instant flood insight. Nature Water 1(10): 835-843.
    [12]
    Fraehr, N., Q.J. Wang, W. Wu, and R. Nathan. 2024. Assessment of surrogate models for flood inundation: the physics-guided LSG model vs. state-of-the-art machine learning models. Water Research 252: 121202.
    [13]
    Ghimire, B., A.S. Chen, M. Guidolin, E.C. Keedwell, S. Djordjević, and D.A. Savić. 2013. Formulation of a fast 2D urban pluvial flood model using a cellular automata approach. Journal of Hydroinformatics 15(3): 676-686.
    [14]
    Goutte, C., and E. Gaussier. 2005. A probabilistic interpretation of precision, recall and F-score, with implication for evaluation. In Advances in information retrieval: 27th European Conference on IR Research, ECIR 2005, Santiago de Compostela, Spain, March 21-23, 2005, Proceedings, ed. D.E. Losada, and J.M. Fernández-Luna, 345-359. Berlin: Springer.
    [15]
    Gu, J., Z. Wang, J. Kuen, L. Ma, A. Shahroudy, B. Shuai, T. Liu, and X. Wang et al. 2018. Recent advances in convolutional neural networks. Pattern Recognition 77: 354-377.
    [16]
    Guha, S., R.K. Jana, and M.K. Sanyal. 2022. Artificial neural network approaches for disaster management: a literature review. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 81: 103276.
    [17]
    Guidolin, M., A.S. Chen, B. Ghimire, E.C. Keedwell, S. Djordjević, and D.A. Savić. 2016. A weighted cellular automata 2D inundation model for rapid flood analysis. Environmental Modelling & Software 84: 378-394.
    [18]
    Guo, Z., J.P. Leitão, N.E. Simões, and V. Moosavi. 2020. Data-driven flood emulation: speeding up urban flood predictions by deep convolutional neural networks. Journal of Flood Risk Management 14(1): e12684.
    [19]
    Gupta, H.V., H. Kling, K.K. Yilmaz, and G.F. Martinez. 2009. Decomposition of the mean squared error and NSE performance criteria: Implications for improving hydrological modelling. Journal of Hydrology 377(1-2): 80-91.
    [20]
    Han, Y., Z. Wu, Y. Guo, and Y. Hu. 2022. Comparative study on Chicago rainstorm pattern and urban disastrous precipitation. Yangtze River 53(5): 35-40.
    [21]
    Itami, R.M. 1994. Simulating spatial dynamics: Cellular automata theory. Landscape and Urban Planning 30(1-2): 27-47.
    [22]
    Kabir, S., S. Patidar, X. Xia, Q. Liang, J. Neal, and G. Pender. 2020. A deep convolutional neural network model for rapid prediction of fluvial flood inundation. Journal of Hydrology 590: 125481.
    [23]
    Keifer, C.J., and H.H. Chu. 1957. Synthetic storm pattern for drainage design. Journal of the Hydraulics Division 83(4): 1332-1325.
    [24]
    Kiranyaz, S., T. Ince, R. Hamila, and M. Gabbouj. 2015. Convolutional neural networks for patient-specific ECG classification. In Proceedings of the 2015 37th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), 25-29 August 2015, Milan, Italy.
    [25]
    Leandro, J., A.S. Chen, S. Djordjević, and D.A. Savić. 2009. Comparison of 1D/1D and 1D/2D coupled (sewer/surface) hydraulic models for urban flood simulation. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 135(6): 495-504.
    [26]
    LeCun, Y., and Y. Bengio. 1998. Convolutional networks for images, speech, and time series. In The handbook of brain theory and neural networks, ed. M.A. Arbib, 255-258. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [27]
    LeCun, Y., Y. Bengio, and G. Hinton. 2015. Deep learning. Nature 521(7553): 436-444.
    [28]
    Liao, Y., Z. Wang, X. Chen, and C. Lai. 2023. Fast simulation and prediction of urban pluvial floods using a deep convolutional neural network model. Journal of Hydrology 624: 129945.
    [29]
    Lin, L., Z. Wu, and Q. Liang. 2019. Urban flood susceptibility analysis using a GIS-based multi-criteria analysis framework. Natural Hazards 97(2): 455-475.
    [30]
    Löwe, R., J. Böhm, D.G. Jensen, J. Leandro, and S.H. Rasmussen. 2021. U-FLOOD-Topographic deep learning for predicting urban pluvial flood water depth. Journal of Hydrology 603: 126898.
    [31]
    Luan, Q., X. Fu, C. Song, H. Wang, J. Liu, and Y. Wang. 2017. Runoff effect evaluation of LID through SWMM in typical mountainous, low-lying urban areas: a case study in China. Water 9(6): 439.
    [32]
    Mishra, C., and D. Gupta. 2017. Deep machine learning and neural networks: an overview. IAES International Journal of Artificial Intelligence 6(2): 66.
    [33]
    Nandi, S., and M.J. Reddy. 2022. An integrated approach to streamflow estimation and flood inundation mapping using VIC. RAPID and LISFLOOD-FP. Journal of Hydrology 610: 127842.
    [34]
    Neal, J., C. Keef, P. Bates, K. Beven, and D. Leedal. 2013. Probabilistic flood risk mapping including spatial dependence. Hydrological Processes 27(9): 1349-1363.
    [35]
    Neal, J., G. Schumann, T. Fewtrell, M. Budimir, P. Bates, and D. Mason. 2011. Evaluating a new LISFLOOD-FP formulation with data from the summer 2007 floods in Tewkesbury, UK. Journal of Flood Risk Management 4(2): 88-95.
    [36]
    Palla, A., M. Colli, A. Candela, G. Aronica, and L. Lanza. 2018. Pluvial flooding in urban areas: the role of surface drainage efficiency. Journal of Flood Risk Management 11: S663-S676.
    [37]
    Reichstein, M., G. Camps-Valls, B. Stevens, M. Jung, J. Denzler, N. Carvalhais, and F. Prabhat. 2019. Deep learning and process understanding for data-driven Earth system science. Nature 566(7743): 195-204.
    [38]
    Rosbjerg, D., and H. Madsen. 2019. Initial design of urban drainage systems for extreme rainfall events using intensity-duration-area (IDA) curves and Chicago design storms (CDS). Hydrological Sciences Journal 64(12): 1397-1403.
    [39]
    Roy, S., A. Bose, N. Singha, D. Basak, and I.R. Chowdhury. 2021. Urban waterlogging risk as an undervalued environmental challenge: An integrated MCDA-GIS based modeling approach. Environmental Challenges 4: 100194.
    [40]
    Saleh, F., A. Ducharne, N. Flipo, L. Oudin, and E. Ledoux. 2013. Impact of river bed morphology on discharge and water levels simulated by a 1D Saint-Venant hydraulic model at regional scale. Journal of Hydrology 476: 169-177.
    [41]
    Sampson, C.C., A.M. Smith, P.D. Bates, J.C. Neal, L. Alfieri, and J.E. Freer. 2015. A high-resolution global flood hazard model. Water Resources Research 51(9): 7358-7381.
    [42]
    Savić, D.A., S. Djordjević, E.C. Keedwell, M. Guidolin, A.S. Chen, and B. Ghimire. 2013. Formulation of a fast 2D urban pluvial flood model using a cellular automata approach. Journal of Hydroinformatics 15(3): 676-686.
    [43]
    Schumann, G.J.P., D. Stampoulis, A.M. Smith, C.C. Sampson, K.M. Andreadis, J.C. Neal, and P.D. Bates. 2016. Rethinking flood hazard at the global scale. Geophysical Research Letters 43(19): 10249-10256.
    [44]
    Sidek, L.M., A.S. Jaafar, W.H.A.W.A. Majid, H. Basri, M. Marufuzzaman, M.M. Fared, and WCh. Moon. 2021. High-resolution hydrological-hydraulic modeling of urban floods using InfoWorks ICM. Sustainability 13(18): 10259.
    [45]
    Situ, Z., Q. Wang, S. Teng, W. Feng, G. Chen, Q. Zhou, and G. Fu. 2024. Improving urban flood prediction using LSTM-DeepLabv3+ and Bayesian optimization with spatiotemporal feature fusion. Journal of Hydrology 630: 130743.
    [46]
    Trong, N.G., P.N. Quang, N.V. Cuong, H.A. Le, H.L. Nguyen, and D. Tien Bui. 2023. Spatial prediction of fluvial flood in high-frequency tropical cyclone area using TensorFlow 1D-convolution neural networks and geospatial data. Remote Sensing 15(22): 5429.
    [47]
    Wang, H., Y. Hu, Y. Guo, Z. Wu, and D. Yan. 2022. Urban flood forecasting based on the coupling of numerical weather model and stormwater model: a case study of Zhengzhou City. Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies 39: 100985.
    [48]
    Wang, H.-W., G.-F. Lin, C.-T. Hsu, S.-J. Wu, and S.S. Tfwala. 2022. Long-term temporal flood predictions made using convolutional neural networks. Water 14(24): 4134.
    [49]
    Weesakul, U., W. Chaowiwat, M. Mudassar Rehan, and S. Weesakul. 2017. Modification of a design storm pattern for urban drainage systems considering the impact of climate change. Engineering & Applied Science Research 44(3). https://doi.org/10.14456/easr.2017.24.
    [50]
    Willmott, C.J., and K. Matsuura. 2005. Advantages of the mean absolute error (MAE) over the root mean square error (RMSE) in assessing average model performance. Climate Research 30(1): 79-82.
    [51]
    Wing, O.E.J., P.D. Bates, A.M. Smith, C.C. Sampson, K.A. Johnson, J. Fargione, and P. Morefield. 2018. Estimates of present and future flood risk in the conterminous United States. Environmental Research Letters 13(3): 034023.
    [52]
    Wolfram, S. 1984. Cellular automata as models of complexity. Nature 311(5985): 419-424.
    [53]
    Xu, G., T. Ren, Y. Chen, and W. Che. 2020. A one-dimensional CNN-LSTM model for epileptic seizure recognition using EEG signal analysis. Frontiers in Neuroscience 14: 578126.
    [54]
    Yan, X., K. Xu, W. Feng, and J. Chen. 2021. A rapid prediction model of urban flood inundation in a high-risk area coupling machine learning and numerical simulation approaches. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science 12(6): 903-918.
    [55]
    Youssef, A.M., B. Pradhan, A. Dikshit, M.M. Al-Katheri, S.S. Matar, and A.M. Mahdi. 2022. Landslide susceptibility mapping using CNN-1D and 2D deep learning algorithms: comparison of their performance at Asir Region, KSA. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment 81(4): 165.
    [56]
    Yu, H., Y. Zhao, Y. Fu, and L. Li. 2018. Spatiotemporal variance assessment of urban rainstorm waterlogging affected by impervious surface expansion: a case study of Guangzhou. China Sustainability 10(10): 3761.
    [57]
    Zhang, W., Y. Liu, W. Tang, S. Chen, and W. Xie. 2023. Rapid spatio-temporal prediction of coastal urban floods based on deep learning approaches. Urban Climate 52: 101716.
    [58]
    Zhang, Z., J. Tian, W. Huang, L. Yin, W. Zheng, and S. Liu. 2021. A haze prediction method based on one-dimensional convolutional neural network. Atmosphere 12(10): 1327.
    [59]
    Zhang, Q., Z. Wu, H. Zhang, G. Dalla Fontana, and P. Tarolli. 2020. Identifying dominant factors of waterlogging events in metropolitan coastal cities: the case study of Guangzhou. China. Journal of Environmental Management 271: 110951.
    [60]
    Zhao, G., B. Pang, Z. Xu, D. Peng, and D. Zuo. 2020. Urban flood susceptibility assessment based on convolutional neural networks. Journal of Hydrology 590: 125235.
    [61]
    Zhao, G., Z. Xu, B. Pang, T. Tu, L. Xu, and L. Du. 2019. An enhanced inundation method for urban flood hazard mapping at the large catchment scale. Journal of Hydrology 571: 873-882.
    [62]
    Zheng, X., C. Duan, Y. Chen, R. Li, and Z. Wu. 2023. Disaster loss calculation method of urban flood bimodal data fusion based on remote sensing and text. Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies 47: 101410.
    [63]
    Zounemat-Kermani, M., O. Batelaan, M. Fadaee, and R. Hinkelmann. 2021. Ensemble machine learning paradigms in hydrology: A review. Journal of Hydrology 598: 126266.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (0) PDF downloads(0) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return