Science and Disaster Reduction

Roger E. Kasperson

doi:10.3974/j.issn.2095-0055.2010.01.002

Volume 1 Issue 1

Mar. 2021

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > International Journal of Disaster Risk Science > 2010 > 1(1): 3-9

Roger E. Kasperson. Science and Disaster Reduction[J]. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2010, 1(1): 3-9. doi: 10.3974/j.issn.2095-0055.2010.01.002

Citation:

Roger E. Kasperson. Science and Disaster Reduction[J]. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2010, 1(1): 3-9. doi: 10.3974/j.issn.2095-0055.2010.01.002

Roger E. Kasperson. Science and Disaster Reduction[J]. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2010, 1(1): 3-9. doi: 10.3974/j.issn.2095-0055.2010.01.002

Citation:

Roger E. Kasperson. Science and Disaster Reduction[J]. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2010, 1(1): 3-9. doi: 10.3974/j.issn.2095-0055.2010.01.002

PDF

Science and Disaster Reduction

doi: 10.3974/j.issn.2095-0055.2010.01.002

Roger E. Kasperson^,

Graduate School of Geography, Clark University, Worcester, MA 01610, USA

Abstract

Abstract

A serious gap exists between science and disaster decision making, so that many scientific reports have little impact and fail to inform decision making. This article examines the complex linkages between science and disaster reduction, analyzing the barriers that prevent more effective use of science and suggesting how the gap between science and decision making may be narrowed.
- decision making,
- disasters,
- risk assessment,
- science

FullText(HTML)

References(30)

References

Agrawala, S., K. Broad, and D. H. Guston. 2001. Integrating Climate Forecasts and Societal Decision Making:Challenges to an Emergent Boundary Organization. Science, Technology and Human Values 26(4):454-77.

Brown, M. A., J. Chandler, M. Lapsa, and B. Sovacool. 2007. Carbon Lock-in:Barriers to Deploying Climate Change Mitigation Technologies. ORNL/TM-2007/124. Oak Ridge, TN:Oak Ridge National Laboratory.

Carr, A., and R. Wilkinson. 2005. Beyond Participation:Boundary Organizations as a New Space for Farmers and Scientists to Interact.Society and Natural Resources 18 (3):255-65.

Cash, D. W. 2001. In Order to Aid in Diffusing Useful and Practical Information:Agricultural Extension and Boundary Organizations.PNAS 100 (14):8086-91.

Cvetkovich, G., and R. Löfstedt, eds. 1999. Social Trust and the Management of Risk. London:Earthscan.

Folke, C., T. Hahn, P. Olsson, and J. Norberg. 2005. Adaptive Governance of Social-Ecological Systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 30 (1):441-73.

Guston, D. H. 1999. Stabilizing the Boundary between Us, Politics and Science. Social Studies of Science 29 (1):87-111.

——. 2001. Boundary Organizations in Environmental Policy and Science:An Introduction. Science, Technology and Human Values 26 (4):399-408.

Haas, P. M. 1990. Saving the Mediterranean:The Politics of International Environmental Cooperation. New York:Columbia University Press.

Haas, P. M., R. O. Keohane, and M. A. Levy. 1993. Institutions for the Earth:Sources of Effective Environmental Protection. Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.

Hardin, R. 2006. Trust. Cambridge, U.K.:Polity Press.

Harremoës, P., D. Gee, M. MacGarvin, A. Stirling, J. Keys, B. Wynne, and S. Guedes Vaz, eds. 2002. The Precautionary Principle in the 20th Century:Late Lessons from Early Warnings. London:Earthscan.

Hellstrom, T., and M. Jacob. 2003. Boundary Organizations in Science:From Discourse to Construction. Science and Public Policy 30 (4):235-38.

Holling, C. S. 1978. Adaptive Environmental Assessment and Management. London:John Wiley and Sons.

Jasanoff, S. 1990. The Fifth Branch. Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.——. 2004. States of Knowledge:The Co-Production of Science and Social Order. New York:Routledge.

Kates, R. W., C. E. Colten, S. Laska, and S. P. Leatherman. 2006.Reconstruction of New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina:A Research Perspective. PNAS 103 (40):14653-60.

Kingdon, J. W. 1995. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies, 2nded.New York:Harper.

Lee, K. N. 1993. Compass and Gyroscope:Integrating Science and Politics for the Environment. Washington, DC:Island Press.

Lemos, M. C., and B. J. Morehouse. 2005. The Co-production of Science and Policy in Integrated Climate Assessments. Global Environmental Change 15 (1):57-68.

Morgan, M. G., H. Dowlatabadi, M. Henrion, D. Keith, R. Lempert, S. McBride, M. Small, and T. Wilbanks. 2007. Best Practice Approaches for Characterizing, Communicating, and Incorporating Scientific Uncertainty in Climate Decision Making. Washington, DC:The National Academies Press.

Moser, S. C., and L. Dilling, eds. 2007. Creating a Climate for Change:Communicating Climate Change and Facilitating Social Change.Cambridge, U.K.:Cambridge University Press.

NRC (U. S. National Research Council). 1999. Our Common Journey:A Transition toward Sustainability.

Washington, DC:The National Academies Press.——. 2009a. Informing Decisions in a Changing Climate.

Washington, DC:The National Academies Press.——. 2009b. Science and Decisions:Advancing Risk Assessment.

Washington, DC:The National Academies Press.

Pidgeon, N., R. E. Kasperson, and P. Slovic, eds. 2003. The Social Amplification of Risk. Cambridge, U.K.:Cambridge University Press.

Renn, O., and K. Walker. 2008. Global Risk Governance. Dordrecht:Springer.

Siegrist, M., T. C. Earle, and H. Gutscher, eds. 2007. Trust in Cooperative Risk Management. London:Earthscan.

Social Learning Group. 2001. Learning to Manage Global Environmental Risks, Vol. 1:A Comparative History of Social Responses to Climate Change, Ozone Depletion, and Acid Rain; Vol. 2:A Functional Analysis of Social Responses to Climate Change, Ozone Depletion, and Acid Rain. Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.

Walters, C. 1986. Adaptive Management of Renewable Resources. Caldwell, NJ:Blackburn Press.

Relative Articles

Supplements(0)

Cited By

Proportional views